Speaker
um So I agree. It's not the most logical episode. I will say that, especially within the Star Trek universe. It does give us a little bit more character type stuff. But I do think that had we had Captain Freeman arcing a little bit, a little bit more involved, we maybe would have had a little bit better of a solve in all of this stuff. It does feel pretty I don't know. It feels like we've sacrificed some of logical plot for jokes, like a couple of Bugatti banging it out on a tree stump. Which again, like I was trying to say, like if you show that they've adapted to this environment and that could that scene could go towards that when Rutherford, when Boimler and Rutherford escaped, that could be like Boimler's like, this is interesting. And we got to use metabolism, blah, blah, blah. Shouldn't then get there, whatever. Like, then you're tying it all together in a way that tracks with lowered X, which tracks with Star Trek. It tracks with the ending that you set up for the episode. And instead, it really is just like, and then, and then, and then, and then, not because of, and then, but it's just the and then. Yeah, yeah, I agree. Which is why it feels a little bit more filler-y to me than the most of the episodes, but we still get- I also think it makes it less funny.