Become a Creator today!Start creating today - Share your story with the world!
Start for free
00:00:00
00:00:01
Episode 31 CDC, state governments cover up Covid death certificate data
80 Plays1 year ago
The depths of the fraud and deceit perpetrated in the name of Covid knows no bounds.
The origin story, lockdowns, masking, hospital protocols, and the vaccine itself have proven to be the biggest ball of lies this world has seen in recent memory.
But that’s not where it ends. In an effort to cover up how deadly the vaccines are, death certificates have been falsified to either not show the cause of death as the Covid vaccine or to blame deaths on Covid itself even when VAERS records show otherwise.
Nobody has done a better job sniffing out this angle of fraud and compiling data and stats on other aspects of the pandemic than John Beaudoin.
John is an engineer by training, but his systematic approach to data and analyzing official records has uncovered even more data manipulation and alarming trends than what most of us are even aware of.
In addition to fraudulently altering or omitting vaccine deaths from death certificates, John is also raising the alarm on the number of excess deaths from acute renal failure that we’ve seen since 2020.
He, along with other independent researchers, put those excess deaths close to 155,000 people.
Why is no one looking into this? Why is our government not investigating this urgent crisis?
John has filed official complaints in various states across the nation compelling those state governments to act and investigate. We talk about those complaints and what he expects to come from them in this eye-opening interview.
*****
Show promos:
Time to choose your homeschooling curriculum! Get the self-taught Ron Paul Curriculum for grades 1-12. Visit https://libertyalliancenetwork.com/rphs to view the courses and curriculum.
Start podcasting the easy way with Zencastr! https://libertyalliancenetwork.com/zen
*****
Show notes: https://libertyalliancenetwork.com/episode-31-cdc-state-governments-cover-up-covid-death-certificate-data/
*****
Subscribe to the 'What Can We Do?' podcast:
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3g0gfNLArRb1GijGAbSJ6u?si=d6f50a5a6caa4092
Apple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/what-can-we-do/id1649251997
Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/WhatCanWeDo
*****
Follow on Twitter/X: @haleyinflorida https://twitter.com/haleyinflorida
Follow on Insta: @haley.heathman https://instagram.com/haley.heathman
Recommended
Transcript
Zencastr's New Features
00:00:00
Speaker
If you've listened to my show before, then you've surely heard me rave about podcasting with Zencaster. I love using Zencaster because they make podcasting easy. And I'm happy to announce that the platform that makes podcasting easy is making it even easier. Zencaster now enables you to create your own clips with captions as part of the post-production process.
00:00:24
Speaker
Now, you could keep creating clips the sucker's way, which is how I was doing it up until now, which entailed watching segments of your podcast on your phone, screen recording your phone, trimming the clip, importing it to CapCut, adding in some captions, and then finally exporting them back to your phone.
Creating Clips with Transcripts
00:00:41
Speaker
I mean, it worked, but it wasted hours of my time. With Zencaster, all you have to do is look through the transcript, highlight the sections you want clipped out, choose your font styles for the captions,
00:00:53
Speaker
and they take care of the rest. Easy peasy. So if you like doing things the easy way, then check out Zencaster.
Getting Started with Zencastr
00:01:00
Speaker
Go to libertyalliancenetwork dot.com slash zen, spelled Z-E-N to get started. That's libertyalliancenetwork.com slash zen. Let's get back to the show.
00:01:33
Speaker
All right, welcome back to another episode of Liberty Alliance Networks.
John Bodwin's Personal Tragedy and Purpose
00:01:38
Speaker
What can we do? I am excited to be joined today by John Bodwin. He has a background in systems engineering and worked 30 years in the semiconductor research and design industry. In July 2018, John's eldest son died in a motorcycle accident at the age of 20. So when COVID hit, the fraudulent COVID narrative gave John a purpose again, which is to save children from harm.
00:02:03
Speaker
He enrolled in law school at 56 years old, attended for two semesters, and was unenrolled due to his COVID vaccination status. John now uses engineering, economics, morality, law, and philosophy to find evidence and bring truth to the people. John, welcome to the show. Hi, Haley. Thanks for having me.
00:02:24
Speaker
Awesome. All right, so let's just dive in.
Whistleblower Complaint and Past Actions
00:02:27
Speaker
I think the big news um in that you're really trying to get attention for and let's just let's just go with it right out of the bat is that um you just released a whistleblower complaint in the state of Connecticut requiring the AG to investigate allegations of fraud. So let's start there. What is the complaint? Why did you file it? And let's ah let's start with that.
00:02:49
Speaker
Sure. um This is the, I don't know, a fourth or fifth type of thing. There are prototypes I did in Vermont, Minnesota, and then I have a book that I sell online, ah the CDC Memorandum, which would serve to the directors of the CDC, FDA, and NIH, and 13 of the deputy directors.
00:03:05
Speaker
Once they're in a knowing state of mind, they can't unknow. And given that they have a legal duty to act for ah the health and safety of the public, you know they should immediately investigate. But of course they haven't, because there's no private right of action that we have to hold them accountable criminally. um I got the Connecticut records last, and that's what this is about. The Connecticut Memoranda series starts out with Volume 1 a month ago. That was served to the Attorney General, Public Health Commissioner, and um
00:03:37
Speaker
attorney Let's see, Attorney General, Public Health Commissioner, and the Governor of Connecticut ah a month ago.
Excess Deaths and Epidemic Impact
00:03:44
Speaker
And that has to do with acute renal failure. Now, before we get into the present one that you just mentioned, ah just very quickly,
00:03:52
Speaker
A key renal failure is 155,000 excess deaths across the United States in the last four years during COVID. And why that's important is that's the biggest loss of life in 100 years. And I include COVID because COVID killed an average age of over the average average age of death. So it's like one year per person. And if you look at the younger people, ah people with families, um you know young kids, sometimes children of 50, 60-year-old adults, so you can have a 24-year-old kid, 25. These devastate families for a long time. And the life years lost of a 25-year-old is is over 50 years, right? So it's 50 times that of a an 85-year-old. So when you look at life years lost, it's the greatest loss of life in 100 years except for World War II in the United States, and yet nobody's looking at it. So um Ed Dowd and Finance Technologies did a study. We had the results come out at the same time.
00:04:51
Speaker
um With two different groups, two different methodologies using two different databases, they came out with 153,000 excess. I came out with 155,000 excess. So it's very close. It's real. It's absolutely real. And um it would only take a week to diagnose, like, what's the problem there?
Hospital Protocols and Financial Incentives
00:05:09
Speaker
If the federal government had ah had a group that was in charge of, say, you know, disease control and prevention, maybe, maybe maybe call it the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, you know,
00:05:20
Speaker
If they had a group like that who would do the job of investigating what's going on, like maybe ah an epidemic of acute renal failure, sudden kidney failure death, they would find in one man weeks of worth of work, they could review the files from, say, 25 to 45-year-olds and figure out through the hourly. When you're in a hospital, right, you get hourly vital signs, you know, pulse, heart, breathing rate, temperature, blood pressure, things like that.
00:05:50
Speaker
along with daily blood labs and the to the minute when they got certain medications. Now, there are two signals in there. One goes along with the uptake of the vaccine for acute renal failure. The other one is seasonal. When you go into a hospital, you get a positive COVID test, you're given a certain drug treatment protocol put out by the National Institutes of Health. It's the NIH COVID treatment recommendations. And it's um it's actually promoted by the new COVID treatment add-on payment plan under CMS.gov, that's NCTAP. So if anybody wants to google you Google, or I don't use Google, I use duck.go, CMS dot.gov, space, NCTAP. And you look at the bottom, you will find that there was a 20% adder to the entire hospital bill beginning on November 2nd, 2020. Now COVID was huge in the Northeast and I have the death records. I have 1.4 million death records.
00:06:48
Speaker
from Massachusetts, Minnesota, and now Connecticut and Vermont. And and in those death records, excuse me, they they show a massive increase in the acute renal failure. Well, when does it happen? Does it happen in that huge first wave in March through June of 2020 in Massachusetts and Connecticut? um It does in Massachusetts, but not Connecticut. But if you divide by the total number of deaths and look at the prevalence of cause, it kind of disappears. It's like, wait a minute, when does it really start?
00:07:17
Speaker
It really starts two weeks into November. Now, the November 2, 2020 date is when the drugs were approved. That's ah Remdesivir, also called Becklery, Illumiant, also called Baricipinib, Pax Levitt is on that list, and there's a fourth one. And then I was also told by an accountant for the government that ventilators were also in that plan. And I said, well, it's not on the website. She said, no, it's in there too. That also gets the 20% adder. To give people a feeling like what are the numbers, when somebody goes in with COVID and they somehow end up in the ICU for a month and die, that's a million dollar bill. 20% of the entire hospital bill.
00:08:01
Speaker
so In order to get paid, they run Remdesivir through your veins just on a positive COVID test, and they'll get an extra $200,000 to the hospital, 200 grand. That's a lot of money per patient. And so i I show in my um my second book, the records of individuals, especially one, 95% oxygen. She was in New York on Long Island.
00:08:26
Speaker
Danielle Alvarez, 95% oxygen going into the hospital. It's in there. It's in the it's it's in the records. just I have 12,000 pages. I gleaned from that 12,000 pages a timeline that shows they put her on Remdesivir right away so they could get paid. And then they started prepping her for ventilation. They put her on a ventilator right up to ventilation. She did not have a problem breathing. I have the vital signs. It's all real. They murdered the girl. um They eventually put her on vancomycin.
00:08:56
Speaker
after sepsis, after the ventilator, because it causes lung infections, and her kidneys shut down and she died. So that's so volume one in Connecticut was showing 1,721 excess deaths in Connecticut, 3,500 in Massachusetts, 2,700 in Minnesota. That's 5% of the US population extrapolated across the US, so multiply by 20, right? So 5% times 20 is 100%.
00:09:22
Speaker
So you multiply that by 20 and what you get is 155,000 people, the greatest loss of life. So let me let me let me stop you right there. So let's just kind of, because you're a numbers and science guy and i'm ah I'm a dog trainer. No, I'm more than that. I'm a podcaster, but I just want to, I just want to slow down and back up so we make sure that we understand what it is you're saying. So I know you are focusing Everybody in this space kind of has their own little niche in their area of what they kind of tend to have gra gravitated to and focused on. You've got people who are dealing with you know vaccine injuries. You've got people who are talking about the hospital protocols. You've got people talking about you know the loss you know the legal side of things. and so you know You've kind of become known for a couple of different things. um One is you are like you're the death certificate guy. you know You're kind of the one that has been
00:10:14
Speaker
studying and and doing a lot of the information and kind of compiling the information that has to do with these death certificates. And then now also you are trying to call attention to this renal failure, acute renal failure and the increase of that. So what lay it out for me, like plainly, what is it, especially with regards to the acute renal failure that you were arguing? Are you arguing that it was caused and it could, there could be multiple answers to this, but just tell me, are you arguing that it was caused by the hospital protocols, um including like the remdesivir, et cetera? Are you arguing that this is a result of the COVID vaccine itself? Is it both? Like what is it that you're trying to say? So it is both the, um,
00:10:58
Speaker
The seasonal signal that increased beginning in November of 2020, um, that's hospital protocols. The vaccine wasn't out yet. That's easy to figure out, but that there's a, is a high bump in the winter. And then it goes away in the spring. The problem is it doesn't go back to baseline. COVID went back to baseline. Pneumonia went back to baseline. All cause excess almost went back to baseline.
Vaccines and Organ Failure Claims
00:11:23
Speaker
But the acute renal failure deaths did not. Why is that? And if you follow the baselines up in a linear fashion on a curve, then that linear line is according to the uptake of vaccines in 2021. So the vaccines also cause multi-organ failure of which the kidneys are an organ. And so if you, through micro clotting and things like that, if you cut off blood supply and create ischemia and you cause tissue to necrose and organs to necrose. Your kidneys will fail and you'll die just like anything else, liver, is liver problems, gastrointestinal ischemia.
00:12:01
Speaker
the stroke, everything like that. So it's both. The answer is both, but but I'm not really trying to tell them what it is. It's up to them to figure out. They have the legal duty to act, all right? So I know I'm known as, I handle death certificates now, right? But I'm a systems analyst and I look at, I'm a systems engineer really, not an analyst, but I look at overall systems. Most of this is behavioral. Most of it is psychological. The the CARES Act, I get into that a little bit later.
00:12:31
Speaker
That's ah it's a behavior modification device to change the way doctors treat patients, and it worked. They got doctors to change how they treat patients. That's a more involved conversation. But um just getting back to center here, the the the Criminal Act is the omission of conduct where people have a legal duty to act. Now, I'll break it down real quickly for your audience. If you're hired as a lifeguard, you've had lifeguard training. If you lie about having a lifeguard training, that's bad, but if you're a lifeguard,
00:13:01
Speaker
And a kid's drowning in front of you and you just say, Oh, well that looks pretty cool. I want to watch him go under and drown. You know, that's not negligence. That's murder because you took the job. You took the job away from somebody else who would otherwise save the kid. And you have that legal duty. The people who have a legal duty to save a drowning child are close family relatives, uh, EMTs, firefighters, police, uh, whose job it is to keep the public safe. And of course the lifeguard.
00:13:30
Speaker
If you've had any lifeguard training at all, even if you're like, you know, 50 years old walking down a street and a kid drowning, he says, throw me the life preserver. And you say, no, I'm going to watch you drown. This looks cool. Um, that's murder. That's not a negligence. It's, it's murder. But if you don't have any lifeguard training and you're not an empty fire fire firemen, um, and you're not a doctor and you're not a close family relative.
00:13:56
Speaker
then it's not murder. That's how the law works. So these people took a job in the CDC, FDA, and NIH. They have a legal duty to act for the safety of the public who is now in imminent danger of harm as they refuse to look at the evidence that's right in front of them. And I show in all my documents, there are death records that expressly state this person died from the vaccine. It's in the causes of death. They're ignoring them. The CDC, in fact, I believe deleted vaccine as a cause of death, which is Y59.0. They have an automatic software program that assigns the codes based on the words. It reads the word vaccine or vaccination, and it will put the code there. And the code is the only way that the public or the government knows how to track these things. Nobody's reading death certificate words. They're looking at data, and the data is built upon the codes that represent the causes. And and very simply, the first one was coded in Massachusetts, Solomon Kizzito,
00:14:53
Speaker
January 16, 2021, two weeks into the vaccination. It says acute rock pneumonia in the setting of idiopathic thrombocytopenia, which we know is from the VAX, and it says from a person recently vaccinated. They're telling you in the death certificate, it was coded with Y59.0. The next nine were not coded. In Minnesota, three were coded. The next six were not. In Connecticut, the first one was coded. The next three were not.
00:15:18
Speaker
Somebody's deleting these codes after they come out of that software that they use at CDC. It's called Transax, another program called ACME. It's all in my book. the the user manuals are online. So I'll take a break now and let you talk. Well, so are you alleging then with the you know regards to some of those these death certificates, not just that they weren't but putting the proper cause of death on there, which would be the the vaccine, but they're deleting it from records that did show it?
00:15:51
Speaker
So like not only. the ah Somebody's deleting those codes. that's that's a dc And that's insane. and And so again, I just want you to be very clear what leads you to believe that, you know, it's one thing to say they're just not putting it on the death certificate. I could believe that. um What lead you to believe that they're deleting that special special code from the records itself? So the the hardest thing to prove in most crimes, not all, but most is intent, which you have to Right. So how do I prove intent in this case? Either there's two scenarios. Either the software doesn't code for it and they manually put it in for Solomon Kizzito and the three in Minnesota and the one in Connecticut, which is Micah. He's 16 year old boy who died of heart attack, cardiomyopathy.
00:16:40
Speaker
um either Either they manually put it in for those, and then they chose not to manually put it in for the rest, which is an intentional act, an intentional omission. Or the software actually worked for the initial ones, Micah and Solomon and the three in Minnesota. And then somebody deleted the ones that came after that. So those are the only two scenarios. You're talking about an automatic software program here, you're not talking people looking through 60,000 records and only, Oh, well we found one. We didn't find the other nine. No, that's the computer does the search for the words and the words are found or not found. And if they're found, the code should be there. They're not there. So somebody did something manually, either they manually put in the first ones and and purposely omitted the next or the computer worked and then somebody manually deleted them. Those are the only two possible scenarios and both of them require intent.
00:17:36
Speaker
Now something because I because I read your complaint, you know in Connecticut last night or is going through it and you know some of your exhibits that you were you matched up the VAERS ah report with the actual death certificate now this could this could be totally Natural ahha that i use that word um this could be there there there could be a just a regular explanation for that i just not being a medical person don't understand but what struck me reading some of those death certificates was that like in almost every case the cause of death um at least i said match it said natural like it is that they died of natural causes there might have been other Is that normal? should that Should it have been described as, I mean, they did have other things in there. They would describe other things, but ultimately they put natural. Is that usual? Is that typical? Is that so is that something going on or is that just normal? If they were properly filled out, it would be an accidental death by a prescribed medication. It would be accidental, but but none of them say accidental. They all also say natural.
00:18:39
Speaker
um In fact, most of those, so all but four of those death certificates of 36 of the correlated bears ones that I have in that document, none of those say vaccine or vaccination anywhere on them. And yet I correlated it with the with the bears records. Not only do I correlate it with the bears record, but i if it says 87-year-old female died on, I'll just pick a day, June 23rd. And I find three there were three 87-year-old females who died on June 23rd in Connecticut. I start looking at the causes.
00:19:09
Speaker
And only when I find that it's one, it's absolutely the one. Like um but I have the Massachusetts ones committed to memory. So I'll just say a 12 year old girl died from cerebellar, tonsillar, and bilateral ochlear herniation. It's the only time I've seen that in tens of thousands that I've read, manually read. I have 1.4 million. And that being the only one, it's also in a bear's report of a 12 year old who died at the same time As the death certificate says, it's the same girl. There's no doubt. There's no question about it. And the various report tells me that she got four shots, meningococcal, Tdap, HPV, and her third COVID shot. And she died of a, that's a hemorrhagic stroke, by the way. It's a type of stroke.
00:19:58
Speaker
She died of a hemorrhagic stroke within 26 days. And I don't know when the onset of symptoms really was like headaches, but usually it's within a day. A lot of the lot of the stroke victims have a terrible headache for starts and starts within a day and it lasts sometimes a week or two weeks. um And then they go full-blown stroke and then they die. um that's I've got a bunch of those.
00:20:20
Speaker
Yeah, and I noticed that too as I was going over the some of the the data was, um I mean sometimes it was within that day or within a couple days. um A lot of it I did notice the things that you were able to kind of um ah confirm and and ah with the death certificates and the VAERS was um the age. You did have a lot of older people and that might be at least from your data so you know eighty nine-year-olds i think i even saw a hundred-year-old so i think that's why some of it at least initially might have gone unnoticed to because you just thought oh these are old people is a lot of them had dementia or they're already frail in some ways and they were on their last legs anyway
00:21:00
Speaker
So, it might not have been immediately obvious. Obviously, it must have been obvious enough to somebody to have made the VAERS report, even though they're 100 years old. They know that they took a steep, ah sharp decline that day or the next day, um and you know they they made a report about it. So, even though these are older people yet, but I think that's why some of it has gone unnoticed. Now, I think what's raising the alarm is, as you said, it's the younger people.
00:21:26
Speaker
You know, and that's where we are seeing the XX death and that, you know, talking about years of life lost, you know, like, hey, a 25 year old who had 50 years of living versus a hundred year old who maybe had a year of living. And so that's why we have been able to sweep it under the rug, maybe a little bit more, but maybe less so now. What are your thoughts on that?
00:21:46
Speaker
Absolutely. I mean, if you go back to, let's say, my Massachusetts pneumonia deaths, I have that on one page of the CDC memorandum, my second publication, I have it by age group. And the age groups are, I'll just start with 25 to 44, 45 to 54, 55 to 64, and up up to 85 plus.
00:22:06
Speaker
And when you look at those, you have a very big first wave of deaths from pneumonia in in Massachusetts. And the second wave is a little smaller. And the third wave is even smaller, almost nothing. And it's that way for the 75 to 84.
00:22:21
Speaker
And then you get to the 65 to 74. And the third wave is now catching up to the first wave. By the time you get to 50 years old, the third wave is a little bigger than the first wave. And then you get to the 25 to 44 is the third wave is much bigger than the first wave. So what you have is negative efficacy where ah if if you say they're vaccinated, how come in the third wave of a disease two years in?
00:22:48
Speaker
You have more people, 25 to 44, dying in the third wave than in the first wave. I thought the first wave was more virulent. I thought it was more deadly. you know what What is killing people the third time they encounter something in society and instead of the first? So you know that there's a lot there's a lot going on that if you really get into... you know I could talk for four hours. um The epidemiological methods that I've I don't know, created or authored. they've They've found a lot of signals that epidemiologists have missed because they use inferential statistical methods and I'm an engineer, I like waveforms.
00:23:24
Speaker
um We don't get into the technical stuff, but i I don't want to say they're all incompetent. I think they've all been expertly trained in a what a manner in which they do things. They're just they don't think outside the box and think, is there a better way? So I've found all these things that, yeah, they killed a lot of people. There's no question about it. And then getting back to the Bears records, you know, I tell you, all the people who died that age, that time, and I narrow it down, I don't leave anything on Um, uncovered and they killed a lot of people, a lot of people. Yeah. Well, and it reminds me and kind of to your point about the epidemiologists, um, who just like, they're just trained in a certain way. I was just listening to the, um, Tucker Carlson interview with Callie and Casey means, and they were talking, you know, she, she was a fifth year surgical student. She walked away with $500,000 in debt because she was, she realized I can't cut into one more patient without understanding the root cause. And so it's kind of like the the doctors.
00:24:24
Speaker
aren't trained in root causes. They don't know the root causes, you know, or they they don't see the the body as a whole. They see it as a part and they treat the part, but they don't treat the whole. And kind of like they're not trained in nutrition and diet and things like that.
Medical Training and AI-Driven Medicine
00:24:36
Speaker
So you can see when you think of it like the training that they get, they're almost trained not to see these things. They're trained not to see certain things. And I imagine the same way to go with epidemiology where they're trained a certain way and the way that they're trained is to train, it's to not see kind of what's obvious to the rest of us.
00:24:54
Speaker
Yeah, well, you hit on a lot of stuff that's actually in my book. um So everything I do is root cause analysis, right? Yeah, well, I'm glad you brought that up. So I can tell you what's wrong with a civil litigation legal system in the United States. It traces back to Ashcroft versus Iqbal in 2009, cited 266,000 times in 15 years. It's the reason my three cases were dismissed on standing. It's the reason why the case from Texas and Missouri against Pennsylvania for election fraud wars were tossed on standing. The Supreme Court cited Ashcroft versus Iqbal, but I don't want to deviate too much. So that's the root cause there. and The root cause in criminal is we've lost access of the people to the grand jury system. The root cause in medicine is evidence-based medicine, which came out of Canada in the mid-1960s.
00:25:40
Speaker
um They did the Canadian Health Care Act up there and they decided to enhance how medical colleges teach. And they commissioned or gave grants to McMaster University. And there were three guys there which started enhancing the scientific method. And they they coined the term evidence-based medicine in 1981. And then after that, all of their research papers pervaded all the medical schools in North America. That includes the United States.
00:26:09
Speaker
So by the time 1992 rolls around, every medical school in the country was teaching evidence-based medicine, EBM. And in that case, they elevate the the literature to be the highest form of evidence. Now, the literature is... the combined information from all the research papers on, say, PubMed. And the doctors, as you know, when you go to visit a doctor to bring it to your audience here in ah in a visual way. um It used to be you'd talk to your doctor, he'd look at you, and you'd talk, and then he'd go and write his notes after. Not now. Now they get the little laptop got on the wheelie table, right?
00:26:46
Speaker
and they're talking to you and they turn their head and they're typing into the computer and oh, anything else, and they just type in all the stuff. Then the computer tells them how to diagnose you. I don't need them to diagnose me, that's AI. they What do we even have doctors for anymore? Now the problem with that is from, and like I said, I do all these root cause analysis. From like economic systems point of view, don't think about economics like money, just think about it as as um creating efficient systems.
00:27:12
Speaker
you lose You lose people at the margins of normalcy when you do that. And that means a lot more deaths. You could lose 10,000 people across the country because you're treating everybody based on a centralized medicine thing. And the papers that they're talking about could have been written halfway around the world with different food supply, different genetics, different water and minerals in the water and pathogens and bacteria in the water.
00:27:35
Speaker
The problem there is that they're not listening to the patient right in front of them, which used to be the highest form of evidence until EBM came along and ruined everything. And now everything is centralized. And we have socialized medicine in the United States that rivals Canada now. It's not as bad, but we're getting there. We're really getting there. All the private medical doctor's offices have been bought up. You now have these big conglomerates. And um yeah, like you said, they're cutting into people. and um when they shouldn't and they're they're they're misdiagnosing people all over the place because of EVM as the root cause ah with the medical problem. Yeah. Well, so then um let's bring this back to your your complaint um with Connecticut. what um Who did you serve it to? i You told me who you served it to. What's the next step? What do you expect to happen next? Do you expect to get a response? And if you don't get a response, what are you going to do? How is this going to play out?
00:28:29
Speaker
OK, so I first gave it to the auditors of public accounts, which is under their Section 4-61DD whistleblower law.
Legal Actions and Public Opinion
00:28:39
Speaker
They have a legal duty under that law to investigate the public records that I've pointed out to them um that they can verify. And then they have a legal duty to refer it for investigation to the attorney general. He has a legal duty. William Ton, the attorney general of Connecticut,
00:28:59
Speaker
to investigate the any reasonable belief or suspicion that the public is in imminent danger of harm, which they are, and the the evidence is all right there. Also, evidence that of the there's a Connecticut law called forgery, basically fraud. I cited that law, and I cited the elements of that law, and I did a legal analysis in the context of the facts that I laid out from the records that I have.
00:29:25
Speaker
So with those facts and those records that meet the elements of forgery and the elements of manslaughter, I also did manslaughter analysis. um He has a legal duty to investigate those. Will he? um Probably not, because we don't have any private right of action. That means that we as the public um can't prosecute criminally. So there would have to be some civil litigants who want to sue the government or sue whomever.
00:29:51
Speaker
um The problem there is Ashcroft versus Iqbal. That's, that's another conversation. Standing. Are you talking about standing? Yep. Standing. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. And, uh, you know, so what do I expect? Um, everything happens based on public opinion. Oh, uh, last thing in, in the end of the document, say you have a duty to impanile a grand jury.
00:30:13
Speaker
Now, the Connecticut grand jury laws are kind of weird. you in In other states, um you have anywhere like 15 to 23 jurors and you need 12 to have a true bill. A grand jury doesn't establish guilt or innocence. They only establish whether or not there's probable cause to indict, whether or not you're going to bring a criminal case against somebody. um that That's what needs to be done. But in Connecticut, instead of having 23 or 15 or 16 people of the people,
00:30:42
Speaker
They impanel a three-judge panel. It's pretty pretty bad because you can't escape the government. The yeah judge the government's gonna investigate itself. Yeah. so So the Connecticut grand jury is three judges. Yeah. And you have to try to... um Yeah, anyway, so that's what i'm that's what I'm hoping happens that I doubt will happen. But um everything h ands on hinges on public opinion.
00:31:09
Speaker
Public opinion drives the legislation the legislature, the executive branch, whether it's governor, president, whatever, and it drives also the judiciary. You think that they're adjudicating based on law. Many decisions are in equity, not law, and anything in equity, it's up to the judge, right? And even even when they call it according to law, like um the rules of civil procedure withstanding, it's Rule 12B6, which is used a lot, um failure or state of claim upon which relief can be granted. Even in that, it's it's all in the subjective whim of a judge. you know is Is the complaint, is the injury in fact actual or imminent? Is it
00:31:53
Speaker
uh, not hypothetical or conjectural. These are all legal terms they use within that. Is is it merely speculative or that these are, these are legal phrases used from Luhan versus Defenders of Wildlife in 1992. Every single one of those phrases is based upon the subjective whim of the judge. It's not law.
00:32:16
Speaker
They can call it law they they they they call it law because it's it's case law. Even as case law, it's still equitable. It's still not law. It's still the opinion of a judge to do what is fair. And they're not doing what's fair. They're doing what's for the government because their paychecks are signed by the government.
00:32:35
Speaker
Right, yeah. Well, folks, it's that time of year again where everyone is getting ready to go back to school. But if you've decided not to send your kids back to school, then that means now is the time when you're deciding on which homeschool curriculum to use.
00:32:51
Speaker
That's why I want to tell you about the Ron Paul Home School Curriculum. The Ron Paul Curriculum offers video-based, self-paced, and affordable courses taught by experts for grades 1 through 12. You can try out the first five lessons of any course for free, and all courses come with a 60-day money-back guarantee. For first through third grade, a parent or sibling helps the child watch the video and complete the lesson assignments.
00:33:19
Speaker
Beginning in fourth grade, students can complete the lessons on their own. Rather than send your kids to school where they'll be taught all the wrong things and all the wrong ways, you can trust the experts at the Ron Paul curriculum. Tom Woods himself busted his butt creating the high school government and western civilization classes, and Gary North is the astute economics and business instructor, just to name a couple.
00:33:43
Speaker
To learn more about the courses, the creators, and the curriculum, go to libertyalliancenetwork dot.com slash rphs for Ron Paul Homeschool. That's libertyalliancenetwork.com slash rphs. Let's get back to the show.
00:34:01
Speaker
Tell me then, because you were talking about the idea of a grand jury.
Grand Jury Challenges and Legal Strategies
00:34:05
Speaker
And I know that in Florida, we have convened a grand jury um by, I think, Laudapo and DeSantis um to investigate you know some of the, I'm not sure the, um you know that basically some of the things that went on during COVID. And the last I checked, they asked in May for an extension. I think they'd had a year and they asked for another six months. I think in Florida, you have 18 months.
00:34:28
Speaker
So they did ask for that extra six months extension so far with the their intermediate report that they came out with. um You know, it had some findings. um You know, they're still I think what they ran into is they're getting stonewalled in a lot of areas from my understanding. I know it's like um ah anonymous. you We don't know who's on there. But my understanding is that, of course, people don't want to sit down and be interviewed or provide evidence to the grand jury. So they're having a hard time collecting data that would help them and make whatever their decision is. Do you know anything about the Florida grand jury? What are your thoughts on that? Can you tell me? I know they haven't called me. There's nobody in the world who has more hard evidence for
00:35:11
Speaker
a trial setting or even an investigatory grand jury setting like that. so i'm just I'm just going to interrupt you real quick because I don't know, maybe and you might have more of an idea. i mean like When I say it's anonymous, we don't know, but how are they chosen? i mean is this It's not like a jury pool, is it? I mean, how do they? it is yeah so it's so like yeah So the people that are trying to investigate this, I mean, they might not, they might just be your average everyday Joe who really doesn't know much about much. but Yeah. tell Tell me, tell me how that works. all right so in Florida. um
00:35:45
Speaker
under Under state law, you have an advisor okay assigned to the grand jury. It's a legal advisor. It says advisor in the law. Now that is a state attorney. So it's ah it's a state prosecutor. Now that state prosecutor assigned, okay if you think about, like I said, I think of everything from systems. i'm sure I've got education in a lot of different things. um I'm not an expert at anything, but I know more about a lot of things than all the experts know about anything.
00:36:16
Speaker
um Here we go. What happens when a guy in a suit who's a lawyer for the state walks into the grand jury? Is he in charge? Just by the nature of what he's wearing and his knowledge, they're going to listen to him. They elected grand jury foreman. The grand jury foreman is supposed to be in charge of that grand jury, but just by the nature of human interaction and behavior of people.
00:36:40
Speaker
of the grand jury form and probably doesn't know that he's in charge. And he probably says, okay, ah Mr. State Attorney, um who are we gonna subpoena today? you know It's like, no, you're supposed to take charge. You tell the state attorney what to do. You tell him to subpoena Fauci.
00:36:57
Speaker
The state attorney does not want to subpoena Fauci because now again again, let's look at behaviors, personalities in the overall system. What is the career track of a state attorney? you know He's not in private practice. he's not His whole career is tied to um like government and potentially being attorney general, or even if he has no designs on attorney general and wants to live out his career as a state attorney, you don't rock the boat against the government.
00:37:25
Speaker
And if you try to subpoena Fauci and get his butt down to Florida, uh-oh, that's a big thing. like they would Who the hell is the state advisor to that grand jury? We're going to ruin his career. We're going to kill him. We're going to do all kinds of stuff to him.
00:37:39
Speaker
well and but Again, the kind of to my point, like if you if it if if you're pulling from a pool of just your everyday average Joes, most of these people, they wouldn't even know where the first that they don't know anything about anything. so so it's like and I don't even think that they would even know who to subpoena, even if you wanted to ah subpoena Fauci. He's not going to be like, oh, I want to subpoena Fauci. I guess that's to your point where it's the the state attorneys that's kind of telling them, you know, the the tail wagging the dog, so to speak, um you know, about which direction to take. And so if if the state attorney doesn't want to, um you know, ah get in touch with John Bodwin, then the grand jury is not going to know who you are. Exactly. Exactly. In order to get in touch with you. OK, so I know people in Florida, I know people in Florida who have evidence who have not been called. Yeah.
00:38:29
Speaker
And they're very upset. They're very upset because but what is the state attorney doing? is Is this just a show piece for, you know, Governor DeSantis to say, hey, we tried, you know, it's like, no, it's pretty obvious you're not trying now. What you said, yes, it's all secret. We, we, yeah who's we? I'm not going to, well, there are people trying to figure out a signature. The signature is of the grand jury foreman.
00:38:54
Speaker
We can't read his handwriting, so we don't know his name, and we can't get to him. And you can sue the government to try to just hand a document to the grand jury, and they will block you. They'll tell you, oh, you're trying to create a private right of action. You're trying to prosecute somebody, so you can't give the information to the grand jury. And and they they they'll block you. They have blocked us with a federal grand jury in the 9th Circuit. I'm in a ah group out west to Two Oregon state senators and Dr. Henry Ealy. So Dennis Lintecombe and Kim Thatcher are the state senators. They were the plaintiffs or the petitioners to have information put before the ah federal grand jury. um ah They blocked us. In fact, that this the U.S. attorney who blocked us
00:39:44
Speaker
was subsequently sent to Africa. He's like, what happened to that guy? He's gone. he's ah He's still working for us, but he's in Africa now. He was reassigned to Africa. I don't know why, but coincidentally. Right, right. um yes Yeah, so then I was just thinking about the the the grand jury then.
00:40:05
Speaker
um you know, and I think that is one of the common criticisms of, of DeSantis. I mean, look, I've made it clear. I like him. I understand he's a politician. So like that like is judged on a curve based on compared to other politicians seems to be better than a lot of them. However, I think what you said, well, it might be true because there are a lot of things that he has done that might be more for show than have like substance. It might be more, what do they call it? More, uh,
00:40:37
Speaker
More hat than cowboy? I like that. Yeah, right. um yeah you know there There have been things that have been really good and and he has won some really, you know and in various um battles here in Florida, he has won some important things. um But some of it might be um a little bit more optics than anything else. um you know So that's just kind of my opinion as a Floridian who I generally like him, but compared to other politicians. We're literally doing nothing, so I guess, you know, that the the the bar is low. um I imagine then the two, you're probably, I'm sure you're familiar with um Dr. Joseph Sansone, and um he he filed a writ of mandamus here in Florida as well. Do you know anything about that?
00:41:22
Speaker
You know, I can't remember my conversation. We talked for, I don't know, 45 minutes one time, probably a year ago, and I can't, I wish I could remember. He's a nice guy, you know, we had a good conversation. I applaud anybody trying to do that. Yeah. I mean, how would that, how would that differ just, you know, from a technical side of thing, from like his written mandamus versus what you've done up in Connecticut, you know, like what would his, what's he trying to do versus what you're trying to do just in a technical sense?
00:41:51
Speaker
So a writ of mandamus is in a court of equity. ah What that means is the judge is sitting in equity instead of sitting in law where it's like injunctive relief. um So the judge can go beyond the law to do what is equitable and what is fair. Now, I don't have the details of his complaint. I i wish I could remember what he what he yeah what he sued for. But um if anybody's trying to do something like that, I applaud it um because he's asking the judge to order the government to do something.
00:42:21
Speaker
that's a writ of mandamus or stop doing something. Right. And i yeah, I guess so. And he his was again, very well, very extensive, you know, big, uh, very, you know, technical, lots of footnotes and everything. And I think again, he delivered that to Dr. Latipo and ah you know, other people and, um,
00:42:44
Speaker
ah Probably like you, I guess, you know, we haven't heard anything back. um You know, I think that's the big disappointment. And I think too, um and probably, you know it, but maybe the flaw in your plan is like, well, we need public support. And unfortunately, the farther away we get from COVID in 2020, unfortunately, apart from people like us, it's fading from people's memories and the, you know, like we got the economy, we got immigration, we got so many other things that are more immediate.
00:43:11
Speaker
And right now that trying to drum up further public outrage and support for some of these COVID things, it's just, it's just an uphill battle at this point in time. Yeah, I agree. Except for one thing, uh, people are coming to realize that their loved ones were murdered.
00:43:26
Speaker
and there's more people dying. So the cancers are now, even though the acute, um I hate the word sequelae, I don't like saying that, but the acute causes of death, the things that happen right away like thrombocytopenia, acute post hemorrhagic anemia,
00:43:42
Speaker
heart attacks, myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, the clot in your lungs, strokes, all those things kind of happen soon after. Although they do happen months, even a year or two after, but um most of the time they happen within ah days, weeks, maybe maybe eight, 10 weeks.
00:44:01
Speaker
The cancers are longterm longer term, like five months. The turbo dementia in older people, people that had maybe the beginnings of dementia, but they take the vaccine and they they have mood status change straight on the death certificate.
Vaccine-Related Health Concerns
00:44:16
Speaker
They liked the right mood status change um within hours or a day or two of the vaccine. They degraded and they some some of them died within five days.
00:44:27
Speaker
um But a lot of them are are dead within five months. Now that's not normal dimension. That's like the vaccines poking holes in the capillaries of your brain. Your brain's leaking into your head. um But I have no, I don't live in a fantasy world. I know that the government will probably ignore me, ah but this establishes a paper trail.
00:44:49
Speaker
You know, 20, even 20 years from now when people say what happened? um Oh, well, nobody said anything. Nobody did the right legal steps and stuff. It's like, no, i it's established. My case is filed with the U.S. District Court District of Massachusetts. And now I have it filed with the First Circuit Court of Appeals. It exists. They can't hide it. It'll be there forever. And when you look back to look at the judge's decisions and i'm ah I'll be writing a an amicus brief for another case. And I'll have within that some of the explanations of civil versus criminal, equity versus law, um where most of the lawyers
00:45:30
Speaker
They just go about their business and do their thing and they don't think of the theory of the law and where it came from and why it exists in the context of the intersection of law and economics and morality. That's why these laws exist. And so, you know, I really like what Childers did, like with the PrEP Act. I don't know if you want to go there.
00:45:48
Speaker
Yeah, we can. And I, um I have not read his prep act. So I know i've I follow his blog and everything, Jeff Childers, Coffee and Covid. um And so I know just basically what he's written there, where he said he used some like novel or creative legal theories that haven't necessarily been tried because obviously trying to go about it in a direct manner, you're going to run up against a brick wall. So we have to kind of ah think outside of the box in order to try and kind of get around the prep act. So if you want to talk about that, if you know more about that, go ahead.
00:46:18
Speaker
Sure. You know, mine was a little bit different from his, but it's basically the same thing. You have to attack the prep the prep act on its constitutionality. um he He had a little bit different legal theory than I would have done. And I'm not a lawyer, by the way, for your audience. um So I love what he did. And constitutionality is the play against the prep act. The reason why it hasn't been done so far, in my opinion, when you study um like like I said, human behavior and and and economic systems. A lawyer has a fiduciary duty to the client in front of him. He can't basically lose a bunch of cases for clients in order to try to figure out what works. For every case, they have to um do what's best for that client. And attacking the constitutionality is never in the best interest of the client because
00:47:12
Speaker
It takes years, sometimes more than a decade to get a case before the Supreme Court, which is the only way to attack it on a constitutional basis. So it just hasn't been done yet, but Childers did it and I applaud him. I think it's great. We don't know each other. I i never read his column. I just hear his.
00:47:32
Speaker
Right. It's right write's a good column. I don't read a lot of other people's stuff. Yeah. ah but But I did read. I can't even remember what it says. I think I read the complaint or at least I skimmed it and I was like, yeah, yeah, yeah. I just remember I really liked it. And um it's the only length time I ever heard somebody else do that. Now, how would I attack it? This is so highly unconstitutional. It's beyond belief. I mean, I don't even know. I don't understand why lawyers didn't rage on this thing immediately. What happened was You know that it has liability shield for the manufacturers of pharma, such that you can't sue. right the The most foundational right we have in the United States is the end of the the last line of the the First Amendment. People say, oh, no, it's freedom of speech. It's like, no, it's not. It's freedom of religion. No, it's not. Freedom to assemble. No. It's the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
00:48:23
Speaker
I have the right to go to the government and say, Hey, you're, you're harming me or that guy's harming me. You got to fix it. Um, and so, I mean, the prep act is a contract between our legislature and a, a profit industry, a for-profit industry of pharma. Right. So within that contract, they agreed.
00:48:47
Speaker
to create the the PrEP Act, where they contracted away our most foundational right, constitutional right, in exchange for no liability and you'll make the drugs and and you you're not liable for it. No, you don't have the right to do that legislature. you can't You need two thirds of the legislature and the president to create a constitutional amendment to override the first amendment, especially the most foundational right.
PrEP Act Challenges and Fraud Detection
00:49:16
Speaker
And the reason I'll explain the reason now why it's the most foundational right. I assume, Haley, I'm probably bigger than you.
00:49:25
Speaker
I can stick my foot in your mouth and you don't have freedom of speech, do you? What are you going to do about it? Punch you. and That's not going to work. I'm a lot bigger. like you and Kick you in the groin. you left yourself choice me You're going to go to the government and say, get this guy's foot out of my mouth. You either sue me or, you know, file criminal charges, whatever. Right. yeah Imagine going to the court.
00:49:49
Speaker
And the court says, oh, you don't have standing. You don't have standing, so you can't sue or you can't get this guy's foot out of your mouth if they turn you away. And that and with a liability shield, they're saying, oh, sorry, we contracted away. You're right to get this guy's foot out of your mouth. Oh, you don't have a life worth anything that you can sue for. Your life is now worth zero because pharma is so important to us. No, no, if foundationally,
00:50:17
Speaker
They've upset the the the basis of civil society. If you can't get justice in the courts, you're going to end up getting it in the streets. When they kill enough people with these with these fake vaccines, the people are going to kind of rise up, right? And and you want to do it in the court. you You don't want to do it in the street, because that's the difference between civil society and a complete breakdown where we're taking the law into our own hands.
00:50:43
Speaker
And so what they've done is with the PrEP Act is trampled the most foundational right we have that upholds the other rights. People say, well, that's the Second Amendment. It's like, no, yeah the Second Amendment is there when the redress doesn't work. right That's the last resort. But they trampled the most foundational right, which is right to petition the government for redress of grievances, the structure and foundation of a civil society where you go to the government and say, solve this issue so we don't kill each other in the street.
00:51:13
Speaker
And that's what the prep act does. And it's that simple. It's really it's not complicated. Yeah. Well, and when I was talking, I interviewed Warner Mendenhall and Catherine Hewick from Freedom Council um not too long ago. And, you know, to your point, talking about fraud, that's kind of and, you know, Jeff Childers is taking on the prep act directly. He's challenging the prep act directly now in terms of what Warner is doing and in these individual cases and trying to find ways around it in order to get justice for these individual cases.
00:51:41
Speaker
he's He's trying to sniff out the fraud because the PrEP Act doesn't cover fraud, so it can it covers the administration of covered you know protocols, but that doesn't entail fraud. It doesn't give you cover for fraud, so he's trying to sniff that out and take it from that angle just to get justice for some of these individual cases. Yeah, I know them. They know me. We talk. Yeah. I like like them. I like Catherine and Warner. Yeah.
00:52:06
Speaker
Yeah, know they what Warner's career is tied to the False Claims Act. He sees a lot of things through the lens of an FCA, which is great. And that's where a lot of these cases should be. They take a long time. ah As far as fraud, people use the term fraud, but it's really, it's called the the Willful Misconduct Exception in the PrEP Act, which is a little different. you know Of course, fraud is part of that. um But the way they they engineered the the PrEP Act is to, you have this weird court you have to go to,
00:52:37
Speaker
vaccine court, or I forget what it's called. But um it's the the process by which you bring a case based on the willful misconduct exception um is different. Now, when Warner is saying fraud, though, he he is expanding into real fraud, where um let's even set the PrEP Act aside. If they wrote stuff down on a death record or on a ah medical record,
00:53:04
Speaker
that was purposely, it was a it was an intentional misrepresentation of a material fact. that Fraud is misrepresentation of a material fact ah meant to induce an action in another where that action brings harm to the other and the action did take place and the person was harmed. I think I covered all the elements of fraud.
00:53:27
Speaker
um it's it's a good It's a good way to go, but the problem is in the civil courts is standing doctrine. And and the courts are dismissing a lot of cases based on standing. And I told you Iqbal versus Ashcroft or Ashcroft versus Iqbal, 266,000 citations in the last 15 years. and that And every one of them is a motion of dismiss based on standing. That's why you use that. That's the only reason you use that case in a citation, as far as I'm concerned.
00:53:55
Speaker
hu Right and so, you know, I've heard you on spaces, um you know before Twitter spaces and um sorry yeah that's okay ah Well, no, but it's great because well and you get all so all sorts in there that's what I like about him I mean, they're they're great because you do get a variety of viewpoints and I've heard you go at it with You know people who basically let's say are not in our camp um And a lot of the ways that they try and discredit you and this is common is yeah, you're not a doctor So, you know like it's kind of well, you're not a doctor. What are your credentials? So, I mean just let's let's let's dispatch with that You know, like if somebody says well, who's this John Bodwin guy? He's not a doctor. He's not even a lawyer Who is he to come out with all this stuff? um You know, why should we listen to you?
00:54:40
Speaker
Because it's all fact. That's not my opinion. I'm bringing forth the facts from the official records from the states of Massachusetts, Minnesota, Connecticut, and Vermont. You can you can read where it says the guy died in two hours or one guy died in five minutes. He didn't get out of the clinic.
Vaccine Death Data and Credibility Issues
00:54:56
Speaker
He had a heart attack right after the vaccine.
00:54:58
Speaker
Somebody else got, they they had trouble breathing that night. And the next day they were sent to the hospital and two days later they were dead from a pulmonary embolism, a clot in their lungs. And then I show you the data that, oh, pulmonary emboli are up like 30 or 40%. And by the way, there's an extra 500 deaths from pulmonary embolism in Connecticut alone.
00:55:18
Speaker
And that's just 21 and 22 doesn't even count 23. There's an extra 400 cardiac arrhythmia. These are just numbers. And yes, I put the numbers together, but they're from the official state records. And anybody who can do math can verify that it has nothing to do with being a doctor has nothing to do with my opinion.
00:55:36
Speaker
this what ah Did they hire a medical examiner all of a sudden who loves to write cardiac arrhythmia on death records? That's his like go-to thing? I don't think so. right that yeah That is the case in and other things. I could get into that, and I'm going to do a paper on that ah with regard to cardiac arrest and AFib.
00:55:54
Speaker
Um, but in the case of pulmonary embolism, they had a pulmonary embolism. Yeah, unless I mean, it's silly. I mean, i I get it. I mean, it's like, I don't need to, I'm looking out my window right now. It's blue skies and sunny. I don't need to be a meteorologist to tell you it's not raining or, you know, it's, it's, it's wet outside. I see some rain droplets falling from the sky. Again, I don't need to be a meteorologist to tell you it's raining, you know? And like, I see that a lot, you know, when they want to be dishonest and like, or they want to discredit you where it's like, um,
00:56:24
Speaker
Like if you post a story and it's like they've got the primary source documentation in the story, whether it's COVID or anything else, but it it comes from Fox News. Oh, that's not reliable. Well here, let me show you the actual document, the words itself. It doesn't have to be from Fox News. It's from any, you know, just look at the, day and they just, they did they will tune you out. La, la, la, la, la, la. It's just, it's just, it's just crazy that like, I mean, they'll try and discredit the source, but when you try and show them a different source that says the same thing, it it it just, they still won't, they still won't listen to it.
00:56:53
Speaker
Yeah, do you have any like what what is the most common criticism or pushback? I mean, I know you've done like a lot of spaces What do most people try and come back at you with and say like to try and discredit you? I kind of gave one you're not a doctor But like what are some others that people throw at you? That's pretty much it You're you're you're not a doctor and you're a liar and I'm like, okay This is sworn to in federal court under pains and penalties of perjury in prison time.
00:57:18
Speaker
I don't I don't think I'm lying. If you think I'm lying, go ahead and try to imprison me because the records are from the state. That's why, you know, with everything else, all the research papers and the doctors and everything, that there's there's opinions and they debate and they debate and they debate. And here we are four and a half years later, they're still debating. I bring facts that are irrefutable. Nobody can really challenge what I do.
00:57:40
Speaker
because they're just official records. there's It's not my opinion. I do have opinions, sure. I absolutely have opinions. But like I said with the acute renal failure, it's it's not that ah you know I'm saying half of them are from the vaccine, half of them are from COVID treatment protocols, but that's not the crime. That's my opinion. The crime is the fact that it would only take them one man week to figure it out, and they're not doing it for the greatest loss of life in American history in the last 100 years.
00:58:09
Speaker
that's I mean, so I'm very narrow with my words. I select my words very carefully. I make sure I differentiate between opinion and fact. um I have not been caught in anything in terms of debate. And they, you know, I don't want to sound egotistical. They they don't debate me. They can't debate me. It's not me. It's the facts. You know, I'm bringing the facts. um That's why if If you were on Twitter spaces where i I was arguing with somebody a couple of times, I mean, that goes back a ways. I didn't know you were listening to me back then. I don't argue with those people anymore, but
00:58:46
Speaker
they They didn't, they didn't fare well. Um, they can only attack me personally. They, they say, call me nasty names or whatever. And they go personal because they they can't get me on the facts. My facts are irrefutable. And that's why I said the the grand jury in Florida hasn't called me because I get the best facts in the entire world. I have two books. Now I get the but another, and basically a book. It's 250 pages I just put out.
00:59:13
Speaker
a couple of days ago in Connecticut and it's irrefutable. you know any One last story, I mean, I got to write this story. I haven't written it yet. I talk about it. So Tommy and the Berry Bush.
00:59:25
Speaker
Now, Tommy lives in the village. He's going to go visit his his relatives in the next village. It's only five miles. It's a safe back in the times when it was safe to travel a road. So 12-year-old Tommy walks to the village, hang hangs out with his cousins, and then he promised his his mom he'd be back for church on Sunday. So everybody's going to church, and his mom's like, ah, where's Tommy? He hasn't home. And they look down the end of the street. At the end of the street on the entrance to the little village, there's a kid lying under a bush.
00:59:55
Speaker
So they go walking over there. Now Tommy's got berry juice in his hands, berry juice and foam coming out of his mouth. He's dead. This 12 year old boy is dead. And the berry bush is sitting there and somebody says, I've never seen this berry bush before. Oh yeah, no, I haven't seen it either. I didn't know it made berries. Oh yeah. And so um they pick up Tommy and they say, oh, let's let's just go through the funeral right away. And and and and Martha says to Ethel,
01:00:26
Speaker
Ethel, let's pick some berries to make some pies for everybody at the funeral.
01:00:33
Speaker
That is not how we live. That is not as humans how we discern what happened. Everybody who looks at Tommy with the berry juice and foam coming out of his mouth dead as a 12 year old boy, they're going to know, don't eat berries from that bush. But the experts didn't tell you.
01:00:50
Speaker
Exactly. That's the ex there were you they were a whole point. There were no experts to tell them otherwise. Yeah, that's the whole thing. That's this worship of these experts, these false idols, experts, experts, experts. That's kind of what we've created, these, you know, false idols and idolization of science and experts. And, you know, I know you're big on like, look, anecdotal, anecdotal evidence isn't, you know, in a singular, yeah, its you can dismiss it, but not in a collective, you know, when you've got all this anecdotal evidence,
01:01:20
Speaker
And I think too, you know going back to what you were saying about like evidence-based, the new mantra, the new slogan and buzzword is evidence-based. But you know like I think something that's that that's shown, I mean, James Lindsay showed it with all this wokeism. I mean, most of these peer-reviewed papers are garbage. I mean, they are hogwash. They are absolute hogwash.
01:01:40
Speaker
So, you know, to put all your stock in the end, and and i've I've heard interviews too with these, ah I mean, like 98% of them, they don't even get reviewed. They can have utter absurdities in there. They literally made it up. And yet it's still, they're getting accolades. Oh my gosh, this is groundbreaking. And I mean, the whole thing, it's it's it's a house of cards. It's a house of sand and fog, a house of cards. It's built on nothing.
01:02:02
Speaker
absolutely nothing. And when you've got like aggregate, you know, ah anecdotal data, like you're kind of proposing to, you know, like in in in the mass, not just a singular thing, that's more powerful than this bogus system of evidence-based fraudulent papers and things like that, that people literally just make up. yeah like Well, the word word anecdote as applied is, you know, I believe it was a plant um by the military intelligence, CIA, whatever you want to call them. You know that conspiracy theorists came from the CIA, right? right yeah You know, they changed the the definition of vaccine in 2020. They changed the definition of anti-vaxxer in 2020. And they started using the word anecdote so much that they got scientists from our side to say, yeah, anecdotal evidence hasn't got it's like, it's not an anecdote. It's a case study.
01:02:52
Speaker
You can't call a case study an anecdote. It's not just a story somebody told you. It's not somebody guy stopped in the street and said, yeah, my brother works for the yeah works department and he yeah he died from the vaccine. It's like, no, it's not that kind of anecdote story. It's a case study. I'll give you an example. um and Brianna McCarthy was 30 years old.
01:03:13
Speaker
she She got the injections, moderna excuse me, just one, Moderna. She had a headache almost right away. um She went to the emergency room twice. They said, well, the hospital's really for COVID patients right now. You shouldn't come here for a headache. So when she didn't recognize her sister days later, um they brought her in and they did a craniotomy, tried to relive relieve the pressure from the ischemic stroke she was having and clots all through her brain. She ended up dying.
01:03:41
Speaker
um They wrote on her on her death record that she died from COVID, ah that the COVID caused the stroke because they had a positive test from four months earlier and she was asymptomatic. So she had an asymptomatic positive COVID test four months earlier. She reacted ah to the, reacted to the vaccine in hours, was dead in days. They didn't mention the vaccine at all. And the the reason why I bring up the anecdote, the, um
01:04:13
Speaker
The ah six doctors from the Harvard Medical College and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center wrote a report in the Neuro Hospitalist Journal about this case. The title is fatal post COVID mRNA vaccine associated cerebral ischemia, which means the vaccine killed her by stroke. It's in the title. Every paragraph said the vaccine killed her by stroke. In fact, they said These COVID vaccines, often they didn't write often. They said there are several reports of COVID vaccines, plural, not just the Janssen, not just the AstraZeneca, causing CVST strokes. That means cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, hemorrhagic stroke. And they said, while this case is not a CVST, CVSTs have been known to happen from these vaccines, where thrombocytopenia is frequent. So I'll just tell you the words they use. Several reports, a number of reports, and frequent.
01:05:07
Speaker
And you know what they wrote in the conclusion? It's extremely rare. It's extremely rare. yeah the these These case case studies, that whatever you want to call them, you read the conclusion and it's completely different than the evidence that's throughout the report. You have to read the evidence. I don't even read. people A lot of people just go to the conclusions. I don't care what the conclusion says because they're lying.
01:05:35
Speaker
Yeah, right. Yeah. Show me the data. Show me the evidence. What are you deriving this report from? Let me see the blood labs. Let me see the, you know, the breathing rate and the time from the vaccine. And then I'll go look up, you know, how many people died from that lot number, you know. Yeah, right. That's another conversation too.
01:05:57
Speaker
Obviously, we could go on and talk for quite a while. There's no shortage of um things, you know unfortunately, to discuss when it comes to all this. I think people are still wising up and and even though it is kind of in the rear view mirror, hopefully people will still kind of put this in the forefront of their mind and and look into it as we continue to raise awareness about all this. but um You know, this has kind of become your, you know, if we go with that, stick with the French theme, ri raison d'etre. I'm not French. I can't, but you know, the, do you know what I'm saying? Raison d'etre. Yeah, you said it right. It's the reason to exist. Yeah. to Yeah. Cause you know, I think as kind of, I alluded to in your, in your bio, obviously you lost a son tragically, and I'm sorry to hear that. Now this has kind of become a new way of something to put your efforts and energies into to kind of, you know,
01:06:49
Speaker
funnel your energy away from the grief that you experience with that. um What do you want people to take away from this interview and from what you're doing? And then the big question that I ask all my guests, what can we do? You know, I know what John is doing. What about the rest of us? What can we do?
01:07:07
Speaker
Well, let me start with ah my my mission overall is to get people to lose faith and trust in government.
Eroding Public Trust and Local Engagement
01:07:13
Speaker
And while it sounds cynical and sounds bad. I've been on that mission for 15 years now. ah and And I got to say my track record isn't great. I hate to say, I'm sorry, I'm not doing a good enough job of getting people to lose faith in government. I wish I were.
01:07:26
Speaker
I don't know. So anyway, sorry. That's all right. I hit a nerve there. That's good. that's good i that's how Again, sorry, going off on a tangent, but that's how i that's how I knew this COVID thing was a scam to begin with, because I've been raving and raging against the government for 15 years now. So I knew this whole thing was bullshit for to begin with. And unfortunately, there are lots of other late libertarians who have been doing the same thing. And yet they fell for hook line and sinker. So I don't know what that says about them. They're cosplaying or something, but i'm I'm the real deal. So again, I'm sorry to interrupt. okay So yeah that's the overall mission. I think in terms of mission objective strategy tactics, right? There are multiple objectives you have toward your overall mission. Your mission is a high level of abstraction. So I want to get people to lose faith and trust in government. Why? Because you can't solve the border. You can't solve the
01:08:17
Speaker
the the the the whole LGBT thing, um you can't solve the COVID thing, you can't solve anything unless you get people to lose faith and trust in government. They'll just keep voting for government and dragging us off the cliff with them. So it's very important that once you open their eyes that the government does not have their interest in mind, then they will they will discern and learn about the other issues.
01:08:42
Speaker
um So yeah, that's that's the that's the biggest thing. um Let's see, COVID. COVID is an opportunity for us to wake people up because they had their friends, mothers, fathers, you know, siblings, children children have died from the vaccine. And if you can get them to realize that,
01:09:03
Speaker
and realize that the government killed a million people, a million people in the United States died from vaccines and hospital homicides. i that's ah That's a different calculation I could go through sometime, but it'll take take a while to explain it to people. A million people were killed by the government in the last four years. If you can't wake up from that, I mean, just carve me out of state and I'll go there and we'll defend our border against the United States.
01:09:31
Speaker
um And what was the other thing? Oh, what can people do? Yeah. What can we do? What can we do? We've we've got this information. We, you know, everything's local. So what do we, what do we do? You can go to, uh, be as local as possible and try to prove to people, um, show that they have a legal duty to act for the community, whether it's the school board bringing in the LGBT stuff. Um, and I have,
01:09:59
Speaker
I have internal documentation from the school in town where they brought in that stuff a decade ago. It cost me two grand for a lawyer, for my son who tried to paint over the rainbow crosswalk. um Raised him right. Raised him right. Yeah, a decade ago almost.
01:10:17
Speaker
But when i when I did the internal emails, did a FOIA, they they they wouldn't respond to me until I cited the law and said, you're going to do a year in jail if you don't respond to me. They gave me some internal emails. The only thing that that the big one that I got was,
01:10:31
Speaker
vice the the ah the principal of the middle school wrote, in the words of Peter DeWitt, we have to stop this hate and all this other stuff. Like, okay, who's Peter DeWitt, right? So you look him up. He's in New York. He's written a series of books and he has these lectures. They send teachers and guidance counselors and administrators to this guy from all over the the United States. And if you look on his webpage, he talks about collectivism constantly throughout it. He's a communist.
01:11:00
Speaker
They're sending teachers to him, so the teachers bring back all this woke communist ideology into schools. It is a centrally planned thing. I've proved that through the state FOIA I got, or or the school FOIA. But anyway, what can you do? You can do stuff like that. I mean, dig in. Like, what what is happening in your town? Look at the condo complexes being built in your town and find out, okay, who's building them and why?
01:11:26
Speaker
you know they're they're They're moving people from cities into suburbs. It's it's all around me. they These nice little towns in Massachusetts for the last 300 years are being basically changed. they're They're moving people from cities into suburbs to change the dynamics so that they can install communism. That's it. Everything is a communist agenda. that was It was Clinton before that, and then Obama put in this law that's only now being realized with these massive housing complexes around me that's like, that doesn't fit in a suburban town. Where did that come from?
01:12:01
Speaker
um So everything is on purpose. these are not just This is not just the way society spreads out. These these are purposeful things being done to subjugate us.
01:12:15
Speaker
yeah yeah Do something. Get involved locally. right That's what I think, you know, Brian McClanahan, you know, he's a historian, but he's, you know, he says the same thing. Think local, act local. That's kind of the theme of the show is, you know, you got to get involved. Look, there's not much we can do, unfortunately, about the the global elitists, you know, the Klaus Schwab's and the Bill Gates's of the world, but we can have an impact where we live in our backyard.
01:12:39
Speaker
And so I urge and encourage people to to get involved, to find something, what's your whatever your niche is, whatever your passion is, whatever your trigger is, you need to dig in, like you said, and and and get involved and start to make a difference as opposed to just kind of complaining about it. So um last word, um where can people go to
Resources and Closing Remarks
01:12:57
Speaker
follow you? what what What do you want people to check out? Plug yourself, plug some of your links, plug your book, and we'll get out of here.
01:13:03
Speaker
Sure. um The real cdc dot.com. T-H-E-R-E-A-L-C-D-C.com. That's where you can find my books. um On Twitter, I am at John Bodwin Sr. You see the spelling like right oops right here, I think. Yeah, right there. J-O-H-N-B-E-A-U-D-O-I-N-S-R. No comma, no period. Just just John Bodwin Sr. That's on Twitter, X. um My website with the press releases,
01:13:33
Speaker
is my LLC, which is Suma Logica, LLC, S-U-M-M-A, L-O-G-I-C-A, LLC.com. Oh, and my substack, where I write some articles, and the press releases go there as well. That's Kokanachina, of course I have to spell that. C-O-Q-U-I-N-D-E-C-H-I-E-N.substack.com.
01:14:00
Speaker
And I know that there are lots of complicated spellings. You've got you've got too much French in you. So um I will have all this written on my ah show notes page at libertyalliancenetwork.com slash what can we do? I will provide all the links to all of John's resources and where you can follow him and any of the other relevant things that we discussed today during the show. Again, that's at my ah page libertyalliancenetwork.com slash what can we do? You can find it then. John, it has been such a pleasure. talking to you. You are a font of information and knowledge. And I am so glad that you are doing what you're doing. We need more people like you who are just, who are convicted in the truth, who know the truth, who aren't afraid to speak the truth and who are
01:14:41
Speaker
um you know, sure of themselves because all the ignorant people are sure of themselves too. But we need actual truth tellers who are sure of the truth, who know what it is and who are going to boldly speak the truth. And thank you for that. I will continue to follow your journey and be of assistance however I can um in the future. Thank you very much, Hailey. Have a good rest of day. Take care.