Speaker
with his Hulk popcorn bugger. But yeah, then we wrap up with Thunderbolts, which I liked it. I actually watched it recently in preparation for this month and I fairly enjoyed it. Here's the conflict I have with Thunderbolts. I thought as a film it was great, but I personally really don't care about the characters that are the quote-unquote new Avengers, which they, by the way, they spoiled that in like a day. two days yeah i was fortunate that i saw it day of i think or very soon after so i wasn't part of that spoil session spoil train yeah i think they probably had this plan prior but they definitely were like people aren't seeing this we need to get them in to see this movie so we have to put new avengers on there to get them in to come see it But like I saw before, the drop of saying like these guys are the new Avengers was like a kind of moment. But it does cut that in the after credits thing being like, oh, actually, there's another group of people that are like the proper Avengers that are fighting a legal battle with us about who the actual Avengers are. Yeah. Which I think that we get from another movie or something where we find out that, oh, the other team must have won because they are still the Avengers. Again, i think the film itself is great, but the whole, oh, they're the new Avengers and, oh, look, who have we got? We've got quirky Russian assassin. We've got the guy from Stranger Things. Oh, don't call a quirky Russian assassin. That's not fair. She is really good in that film. Yeah, she is But I don't know. There's just something about her characterisation that really... Again, I don't think she's offensive in any way. Or Florence Pugh, she's a great actress and everything. But it's sometimes where she's... And again, i think it extends to the whole cast of that film where the Marvel humour kind of seeps in a wee bit. And I'm like, no, no, no, no. Dial it back. We've got a serious plot thread with Sentinel. Come on, apparently. back be a bit more serious oh no how are we gonna fight them as well oh here we go but yeah overall i think it's a great film and yeah they definitely dropped the whole i mean they still have multiverses and everything but they dropped the whole kang the conqueror thing after quantum mania because of the real and again i'm saying for legal reasons alleged real life crimes of jonathan major's I believe he was cleared of the charges, to my understanding, if I'm wrong, apologise. So there was like a, well, are they going to bring it back? But there was so much around it that it probably wouldn't have been great PR to do so. And also because they'd already kind of decided they were dropping it because it wasn't working really either, that they just moved on to the doomsday thing. They might return to the Kang stuff at a later point. They could recast him if they don't bring Jonathan Majors back. But that's the thing though. It's like, can you imagine if you built up in the Infinity Saga to Thanos? that was... Yeah, and he got one-shotted by Howard the Duck in an alternate universe, and I'm sure there's a comic out there where that happens, but yeah, you wouldn't take him seriously. The whole mystery of, oh, who's Thanos, and oh, he's building him up, and he's this very intimidating character, that was the whole point. But have Kang just get bodied by a giant ant, you know, well, several ants, to be fair, but still, that was a dumb film, I hated it. I hated MODOK, just... I hated it all. That was Spy Kids level. It was Spy Kids level. And MODOK is a ridiculous character in Marvel. In the comics, he's ridiculous. He looks stupid. But that was very poor representation of him. I'd been watching the those out the people who made Robot Chicken did a MODOK TV series. Oh, yeah. forgot about that. It's quite fun. And so I quite like the character of MODOK. And then they did this. And i was like, oh, no. No. Put him back! Oh god! It's just so stupid. And I think what's worse is they do that thing where it's like, oh haha, it's stupid, we're in on the joke as well, guys. And it's like, no, no, no, you don't get to stand there as a multi-billion dollar company and be like, ooh, we're in on the joke. Because I think between phases four to six, there was a lot of behind-the-scenes drama where they were letting, and I think they still are, were letting go a lot of the visual effects people. There was also accusations of, especially for the TV series Secret Invasion. Oh, I forgot about that. They were accused of using AI in the opening. I don't know how true that is. I believe they admitted it, they used AI. I could be wrong on that, but pretty sure they did. The fact is Marvel is so CGI heavy. It's like, why would you not pay these people what they're rightfully owed? you know it is baffling that they're like, oh no, we can do it without them. They give Robert Downey Jr. $100 million dollars and then aren't willing to pay their special effects team. I mean, Robert Downey Jr. is obviously a large part of why they've been so successful, but the special effects are so important in that you aren't paying the people to do it, then you're not going to have a product that's going to make the money. Yeah, because I mean, other than maybe Loki season two in this phase, and what if as well as we've gone over, you know, I mean, we've got Echo, which... I didn't finish Echo. Was it bad, or...? No, i just didn't continue with it. My and i watched a bunch of it, and we were like, how incredible is it that they have found an actress who is native, is deaf, and is missing a limb, and can act.