Speaker
ah are born without advantages socially than I have cared about people who are born with advantages socially. And that's obviously partly because of my own background. So that has obviously informed my future work. I suppose a sense of fairness that is rooted in, you know, this world and and immediate economic circumstances. And I've always, I suppose, when I'm looking at a a social issue or political issue, I tend to go to a socioeconomic analysis of it rather than an intellectual analysis of it. I think that's part of the results my upbringing too. Like often, you know, people will write sit back and give interesting history of ideas type approaches to how this bit of British culture came to be like it is, or this issue is informed by this. I often will think, well, you know, who's got the money and how can people get it and who's got the power and where does it sit? to Rather than thinking that it's, um you know, there's sort of material factors, I think, as background where often material things were lacking. um I think maybe i become I'm more sympathetic analytically to material explanations for things as a result rather than intellectual explanations for things. But I don't that's the first I've thought about that. So you've asked me a question that's made me think about something i've not thought about before. and But I would say that that was, broadly speaking, at least a beginning of an answer to your question. I think it was a very good one. And, um you know, it's interesting ah you describe the things that you take for granted are things like ah solidarity with your community and thinking about how money and class influences things. and You're the second guest on this podcast that that I've interviewed that ah that went to Oxford, but both of you came from very working class backgrounds. The other would be Dr. Sarah Wilkins-LaFlamme, the sociologist who grew up in in rural Quebec to a family that also didn't send a lot of people to university to hear her describe it.