Become a Creator today!Start creating today - Share your story with the world!
Start for free
00:00:00
00:00:01
Reply All: IDs, Pushback, and Power #43
38 Plays28 days ago
From Kansas ID rollbacks to the State of the Union, co-hosts Mattie Bynum, Melodie KG, Daniel WK Lee, and Shane Lukas discuss how power uses narrative, bureaucracy, and selective “exceptions” to justify broader harm. The co-hosts unpack how “freedom” gets framed as individual impunity rather than collective safety—and how that framing fuels policies like the SAVE Act’s documentation requirements. They connect these moves to older strategies of disenfranchisement, arguing that reducing participation is the point, not a side effect. The episode also explores how protest becomes criminalized when it threatens the story those in power want to tell, including escalating federal responses to anti-ICE organizing in Minnesota. Underneath it all is a warning: when the system tightens, it’s testing how divided—or united—communities will be.
Recommended
Transcript
Safety and Fascism in America
00:00:00
Speaker
We're becoming an America that's more fascist today than it has ever been in the world. We're becoming an America where it is okay to openly disrespect and hurt people. We are coming into an America where I feel safer carrying my gun to go buy a carton of eggs than I do rather than just to be outside, period. And that is because of him. So he has changed America, but was it for the better? I doubt that.
Introduction to 'Power Beyond Pride' Podcast
00:00:26
Speaker
Hello and welcome to Power Beyond Pride, weekly queer change-making podcast bringing you voices and ideas from across our fierce and fabulous spectrum to transform our world.
00:00:38
Speaker
I'm Melody K.G., a Minneapolis-based artivist, consultant, writer, provocateur, and i look forward to chatting today about the rise of fascism.
00:00:48
Speaker
Who else do we have with us today?
Meet Shane Lucas
00:00:50
Speaker
but but And we will be talking about that today for sure. I'm Shane Lucas, lifelong harm reduction activist, a great idea owner, and the glitter budget oversight manager. That's right. i Any glitter that goes across this show, that's i'm i'm i'm I'm the glitter control, i tell you.
Impact of Policies on Marginalized Communities
00:01:09
Speaker
On this show, we're talking about what happens when your identity, your protest, and your vote all end up on a political chopping block.
00:01:17
Speaker
And I am Maddie, always the loudest one in the room. And I can definitely say, Shane, you do sparkle. So I can definitely see how you are in Glitter Patrol authority. So I can get that. And I think that at this table, we all care about how policies hit real people, because when states can't rewrite IDs and Washington can rewrite rules, it's the marginalized communities that always get affected first.
Gender Marker Changes in Kansas
00:01:42
Speaker
All right, so let's go ahead and get into our first topic that's not of today. So we're going to talk about the state of Kansas. On Thursday, February 26, the state of Kansas revoked the gender marker changes on driver's license for trans residents.
00:01:56
Speaker
That means people who legally updated their IDs are now being told, actually, know your ID is illegal. So my question is, what does this mean for everyday safety for trans people? And how does an ID that doesn't reflect your your correct gender increase the danger or risk on their lives?
00:02:15
Speaker
For me, i worry about accessing social services because the moment that you have to present an ID that matches some other document or that matches how you present or et cetera, et cetera, it's already a dicey
Social Services Access and ID Issues
00:02:34
Speaker
system.
00:02:34
Speaker
And now if you have a certain gender marker, You can be denied social services. You can be denied entry into certain types of shelters that are gendered, for example.
00:02:47
Speaker
but So i I really feel for folks who especially are on the margins or who are accessing different types of food benefits or WIC or TANF or other Just anything. This is really going to suck for a lot of people.
00:03:03
Speaker
Well, I would definitely say the biggest thing i look at it as is is when you go to get your gender markers changed. And the first thing you have to get changed is your license. And then you can get your your birth certificate changed. You can get a passport or get your passport changed at that point. So my concern is, does this now affect the other paperwork? Because if this is now going back to reflect your gender marker of what you were born, now none of your paperwork is going to match. Melody was saying, so does that null and void? And if it does, what does that mean?
00:03:35
Speaker
In that sense, what I'm saying? Because then it's like trying to travel. I always think of as trans traveling to another country. What if I go to Dubai and my passport says male, but I'm presenting as female? How does that work?
00:03:48
Speaker
How do I get in? So you have to look at all of those different things and and look and think about the fact that it might seem simple because it's an ID, but that one change now affects a whole trail of other things to be changed.
00:04:01
Speaker
Well, in the institutional consistency too, in addition to that, when we talk about social services, as Melody highlighted, and then obviously passport access and what that means to, again, actively have a system work against your self-identification, like all of these things being critical. But then what happens in healthcare? What happens in other institutions, not just those of public services, but really other institutions, which at some level have some gender relationship or some gender identification through
Kansas as a Transphobic Policy Test Case
00:04:30
Speaker
that process?
00:04:30
Speaker
And now when there's dissonance, how does that get resolved from a practical standpoint? But I think what's, to me, fundamentally important is what this means in terms of testing the waters on continued attacks and vitriol shown against our trans plus community members. Like how that is being deployed and institutionalized that way. We've seen it at the federal level. whether that's through questions around passports and renewals. I know a number of TransPlus community members went and hurried and got the renewals done as soon as possible before certain ah processes were shifted. And there's just a lot of uncertainty as to what will pass, what will not pass through those renewals. in this current time. It it just doesn't seem to be uniformly applied, and that's a fundamental challenge. But a state that's going to uniformly dismiss all all IDs in that context, I mean, again, it has many different implications, many of which, again, not living in that experience in Kansas and
00:05:26
Speaker
Who knows what that means on a day-to-day basis when somebody asks for an ID when you have a credit card, what that means when you are going for a job interview, what that means through the varying parts of your existence and when that calls into question. That level of disclosure creates enormous vulnerabilities for communities that are already under assault and already experience that transphobia at ah nearly every intersection.
Community Fractures and Trans Rights
00:05:47
Speaker
And so they're doing it on purpose. I think it's really important to know what this long-term intention is. Is Kansas intended to be a a a test to see whether or not other states will begin to deploy similar transphobic policies?
00:06:03
Speaker
And then really a big concern around queer activists is the simmering idea that somehow this isn't a battle worth fighting.
00:06:14
Speaker
And I think that sits among a lot of queer community members, especially those in power who talk about whether this is either a distraction or just not as important as other facets of of the queer assaults in varying ways. And I think it's really important that we recognize while trans plus community members make up a portion of the queer umbrella, it is an incredibly important All of them are incredibly important to portions of the queer umbrella. And where they're looking for those fractures and those vulnerabilities, those are tests.
00:06:43
Speaker
Those are ways they are looking for other ways that they can find. And they just are capitalizing right now on a transphobic sentiment. And if we continue to allow, and I mean, we broadly in terms of queer people with power who seem to want to think this is not a battle worth fighting, I think they're mistaken.
00:07:02
Speaker
I think that every individual among our queer communities who experiences this questioning of their identity, of the who they are, their value, their human their their human identity, whether they become dehumanized or not, that should be a big concern for every single person. So I see Kansas and not just for Dorothy, but I see it very much as this test run.
00:07:24
Speaker
They are literally trying to use it as ah as an example. And I think we we we really have to be careful of our own community members as they have their own discomfort and they yield to that even in a moment like this. I think it's it's um it's a moment we have to we have to be very vocal in our pushback.
00:07:41
Speaker
And it could be very divisive within the trans community because obvious because the the way a ID that is invalidated by only through the perception of who actually looks that idea ID and who is presenting it, because obviously Because someone who may pass as who may pass and that may not be is like a gender rebel and not, you know, whose presentation may seem more conforming, may have less of a target or may have less obstacle with their with their accessing of things that they are say present female and their and their IDs say that they're that they're female. I mean,
00:08:26
Speaker
The law seems like it just invalidates the ID. And so then, but I don't really, i don't really know what, how that, what that actually means in terms of, oh, I, if I, if I'm a trans person in Kansas, my ID is invalidated. But the only way that anyone could see that it's invalidated is if they, if they see that, oh, it my card says I'm female, but I present it differently. It's really divisive within the the gender, but the, the gender expansive community to, get to to, oh,
00:08:54
Speaker
Obviously, they're more vulnerable than someone who presents in a way that's passing. All right. Right. So it's it's very odious and and and and horrific and another layer in which like the states seem to be picking up the mantle and of trying to target the most most most vulnerable. Yeah, I mean.
State of the Union Address Critique
00:09:21
Speaker
It's all fucked. Well, speaking of the state, I think one of the other big pieces of this last week is we got to witness the most recent State of the Union.
00:09:32
Speaker
i do want to mention, just real quick as we before we dig into the State of the Union, we did just recently attack Iran. We did do so and remove their leader. I think it's just important to note. We probably won't dig into that much today. We certainly are aware of the violence that happened there, the many community members, both here, who have family in Iran, as well as Iranians and queer Iranians.
00:09:56
Speaker
who are experiencing a lot of probably different different things right now, a lot of a lot of violence, a lot of witnessing a lot of violence. we won't know we We talked about it before we before we kicked off today. we'll we'll We'll dig into this likely in the future as we talk about the way that America is enforcing and bringing its power abroad. It's not the first time we've done this in the last year. so that's horrifying in and of itself.
00:10:19
Speaker
but But our thoughts and our arts do go out to all individuals who certainly are are are feeling that impact. again from their families, if they're feeling it here. However, you're feeling that it's it's a pretty intense experience. And we we recognize that.
00:10:32
Speaker
But we do want to talk about the State of the Union a little bit, because that was an long. For those of you who are not aware, it is the longest State of the Union that might have been on record, an hour and 45 minutes. Not that I listened to it. I listen to highlights like everybody else. um So that happened. But we want to talk about a little bit from a queer lens in a trans list. I couldn't sit through an hour and 45 minutes. good Could you? If you did, listener, we certainly want to hear how that experience was for you. So we want to talk about a little bit of it, again, from queer lens, from trans lens, from the perspective of somebody wondering whether their health care, their marriage, or even their legal identity is secure, as we saw in Kansas. We were looking for an update from the State of the Union. And yet, and yet, what did we get? So when the president gave the address, what did LGBTQ plus Americans hear?
00:11:16
Speaker
Did we get assurance? Did we get silence? Did we get a warning? What do you all think? I'm going to be honest and say i think that I got a bunch of reality sound bites from the State of the Union drew address. What I did listen to and what I did actually try, I i tried to watch it and and i I couldn't. I really couldn't. I tried. But what I did watch and what I have caught up on since, I will say to me, I don't think he focused on anything other than himself. and trying to make himself look like he is the reason that we are in the position, which is funny because he made a statement and said that we are becoming a greater America than we've ever been because of me. Now, you're right.
00:12:02
Speaker
We are becoming an America that we've never been in. We are becoming an America because we're becoming an America that's more fascist today than it has ever been in the world. And that is because of you. We're becoming an America where it is okay to openly disrespect and hurt people. And that is because of you.
00:12:19
Speaker
We are coming into an America where I feel safer carrying my gun to go buy a carton of eggs than I do rather than just to be outside, period. And that is because of him. So I do think he was correct in that sense.
00:12:32
Speaker
He has changed America, but was it for the better? I doubt that. Doubt it. So that's that's my opinion on the State of the Union. And then, all oh yeah, you only could get applause because you brought the men's hockey team, U.S., United States. And then, yeah, yes that's all I got.
00:12:52
Speaker
I mean, I didn't watch any any of it. I can't even listen to that that man's voice, let alone try to go an hour and change for it. But understand he so he told a story of a Virginia te teenager ah who was kind of socially transitioning.
00:13:14
Speaker
And use the kind of to not kind of used it to attack states and schools, allowing allowing transgender and non-binary students who to kind of walk in this world as the as the gender they wish to present.
00:13:30
Speaker
And i mean, it just seems par for the course for this, for them. and and his administration to kind of, it again, attack the most vulnerable trans trans youth and try to make, i don't know, score points with his base to be like the most mercilessly awful piece of shit ever.
00:13:55
Speaker
I mean, ah i don't think he's presented anything new, just shown himself to be willing to attack institutions and other actors who are trying to actually help trans people and trans kids.
00:14:10
Speaker
i'll add I'll add two things to that before before we go to break. One is, i think it's important to note the way that storytelling is used, in in especially in these particular instances, where the exception is used as the rule. So as you said, i'm talking about a young person who struggles with transition.
00:14:27
Speaker
is important because we can all talk about the universality of queer experience, trans experiences. There just simply are many different, which is what makes us all human, a lot of different experiences. What we can look at the data.
00:14:40
Speaker
And of course,
Trans Narratives and Policies
00:14:41
Speaker
when we're looking and and they're elevating a story in that process, they're often elevating the far end of the exceptions. And I think it's important. This person who struggles with that, it's great to acknowledge.
00:14:52
Speaker
I want to say they said did the same thing around trans sports. They chose, what, as somebody who came in fifth? And and that's that that became their marker of the entire experience about how trans athletes are somehow displacing other athletes, somebody who came in fifth, who would not have come in even close to first under the best case of scenarios if they had not, or not best case, but if they had excluded all trans athletes, that this person was never going to be someone who is going to be in in the in those spaces. And yet, this is the way they're going to storytell. So I think it's important because they're not using data. They're using these individual stories. They elevate these individual stories. And then we we give it air, um or I should say the culture gives it air, because it it basically amplifies the discomfort that already exists. So I think it's just really important if you're not comfortable with people of trans experience and you hear a story like this, then you glom on to the one exception that's going to make your position true.
00:15:45
Speaker
And I think it's important for those of us who want to advance and and make sure that we're talking about inclusive practices. We talk about the data. We talk about those successful stories. We talk about what it means. Even the successful stories that have themselves conflict.
00:15:56
Speaker
Because we could talk about people. Because, again, as queer people, if you identify a lesbian, queer, bi, whatever, you have had many different steps along your journey. And I think it's important we amplify this idea that it is not a one-and-done experience for most people about their journeys of identity, gender, sexuality, all of these things.
00:16:13
Speaker
that these journeys are themselves. They have a lot of different pathways. And that's important, right? Because it is part of the human part of the process. And I think that not talking about that gives them some air to be able to talk about the things that they do in fueling their work. The second thing I want to do, and then we'll head over to break, is really along this idea of, hey,
00:16:34
Speaker
The power positive thinking of Trump as anything in listening to, and I listened to about, again, nonstop, I listened to about
Politics and Public Reality
00:16:41
Speaker
45 minutes. I couldn't really tackle the full hour in 45 minutes. I had really at some point just stopped it was just a lot.
00:16:46
Speaker
But there was a lot of power. But he also recognizes like no one is paying attention after the first 45 minutes. I think the data on the drop on on it ah you it goes pretty fast right after the start. That is the power positive thinking. It is the it is the constant reiterative use of, hey, the economy is better than it's ever been.
00:17:03
Speaker
which none of us feel. Having this sort of over and over sentiment, as you stated, Matty, America is the better that it's ever been. I would probably take i would probably have differ one place with you, Matty, which is to say, America has a long history of fascism. this is not This is not new. I'm not necessarily saying we don't have great things about the nation. I'm saying that, hey, like we do have histories where we have been on the borderline of embracing. And one would argue, actually historians would argue, that we even modeled a lot of the things that fascism sort of took on in the nineteen forty s So our history is one of complexity, and I think that's important. So I think the the bedrock of the nation still has some of the things that they're triggering.
00:17:41
Speaker
What I think is important to note is that power positive thinking, if it doesn't jibe with your reality, like then yeah, those are good questions for people to have, and we want to elevate those questions because we're I don't know about you, but it doesn't feel like the economy is great. I don't know about you, but it doesn't feel like things are on an even keel or that there's a sense of certainty or predictability or these things which help us plan what we want our kids to do in the future, what we want our jobs to be in the future, what we want our what our retirements or our what do we want to be doing in the future. At this point, it's just like one uncertainty after another. And every week is something different. And I think not speaking to that is is something that I would feel would be a gross dissonance, whether whatever political side you're on.
00:18:24
Speaker
And my hope is that people do hear that kind of, hey, power positive thinking kind of thing and just go, that's not my existence. And so, again, I'm hoping that that, if anything, helps do some of the fracturing with certainly that line of of political leadership.
00:18:41
Speaker
But we'll have to see. Again, we we're we're just through the through the primaries for the midterms this week. We'll see how those shake out. And on that note, we'll take off the break. And we'll come back with a deeper dive in some key headlines on the other side of this break.
00:18:55
Speaker
Please stay tuned, informed, and connected.
Freedom and Governmental Roles
00:19:05
Speaker
All right. Welcome back. This is Power Beyond Pride, a queer change making podcast. And I'm Melody KG here with my co-hosts. Maddie Bynum, the loudest one always.
00:19:16
Speaker
Shane Lucas, the fire starter. And Daniel. while we were at break, I had a thought. When leaders talk about freedom, who are they picturing?
00:19:29
Speaker
It's a good thought. I definitely don't think that they're taking an effect everybody. i think it's a very narrow view that they look at when they're thinking of freedom.
00:19:40
Speaker
I think it's about freedom of self, right? Like at the end of the day, it's the freedom to want what I want and access what I want. I don't think there is a sense of a collective sense or the impact of those freedoms. I think that's the big...
00:19:56
Speaker
That's the big tension in America is this idea of freedom for me and freedom for everybody and how other people's freedoms encroach upon my sense of freedom. That is the tension. But that is what we have a government contract for.
Voter ID Laws and Disenfranchisement
00:20:11
Speaker
And so that that would be my sense is that why we have a government is that every individual agrees that there is going to be a and and a structure to monitor and control those those parameters.
00:20:24
Speaker
Yeah, I mean, I think it depends on who's who's speaking. I think when like Trump or the Republican Party or even probably so some Democrats, freedom means to do whatever you want without consequences, to to have impunity.
00:20:39
Speaker
And certainly there's others who who think otherwise. But I mean, and it also I think is know depends on who they're talking to. Right. Like their their definitions are shifting depending on the messaging and this kind of opportunism of messaging and um ah makes the electorate and I think people like like questioning what do these what are these these hats these political heads what do they mean because it doesn't seem like they are tethered or wedded to an actual idea or a value of any sort yeah
00:21:20
Speaker
Yeah, and I think we see this in how how like the electorate is set up, as you said, we treat folks who don't fit narrowly within or neatly within certain boxes.
00:21:38
Speaker
Certainly, if we think about things like the SAVE Act, right, which was introduced in Congress in 2024, reintroduced, right, currently on the docket, if passed, would would claim to ensure that only citizens have the right to vote, right?
00:21:58
Speaker
Which, like, on the surface seems, okay, well, fine, only citizens have the right to vote. Whatever. That's in line with current rhetoric. But then also what that does, it actually removes some freedoms to vote for for people who are citizens, right? Because it it because of the the bureaucratic requirements that it's putting forth, right? So if passed, the act will actually prevent millions of citizens from voting by requiring people to show a passport or a birth certificate in order to register.
00:22:32
Speaker
And also currently... a current government-issued driver's license or ID, right? ah So it's it's just, it's interesting to hear all of this rhetoric around freedom, around choice, around ah strengthening individualism.
00:22:53
Speaker
Meanwhile, like, the things that are being enacted or talked about or reintroduced are actually like stripping us of, of real freedom.
00:23:04
Speaker
and as Shane so lovingly brought up earlier, like we've We've been seeing fascism in different forms for a long time. And this this all just feels like more of the same, right? It feels like these different pieces are coming together that are actually anti-freedom, that are anti-individualism, that are anti-rights, and more about upholding a specific vision of what Americans should be and Americans should look like. And it's white and it's Christian and it's
00:23:38
Speaker
cisgender and it's capitalist. And it's well resourced, right? I mean, part of the part of the the the things that make this so interesting is that America has, compared to a lot of other democracies or social social socialist democratic socialist nations, we have a low turnout.
00:23:57
Speaker
Like, we do not vote at higher levels. So one of the interesting things and the and the sort of underlying themes of this is this fear that somehow our elections are having all these people who who are voting, who who who should not be there, either because they're fraudulent or because they don't have a vested interest in the nation. And yet, two things about that.
00:24:19
Speaker
One, in those rare instances, and it is very rare that have there have been incidences of voting fraud that have ever been documented and acknowledged, it has almost universally been conservatives.
00:24:31
Speaker
Almost universally. Like, again, I can't think off the top my head of any progressive who's had that issue, but I'm sure i don't want excise the idea that it that it's possible. But I'm saying it is, by and large, every incident, whether it was here in North Carolina, in Mecklenburg County, and within even just the last five, six years, or other places across the country, it has almost universally been conservative and people who are are afraid about change and fundamentally want to stack existing forms of power. And oftentimes at the cost of people of color, oftentimes at the cost of rural communities. That's often the case.
00:25:05
Speaker
The other part about it that's really interesting to me is, in principle, the idea of having people who identify in their citizenry to vote doesn't seem too crazy of a thing to do. What I think we don't often dig into and what you're hinting at, Melody, I think is that there are institutional practices which do inhibit individuals from accessing those things. This has been compared to poll taxes. and For those who are not familiar with poll taxes, those were done to prevent people of color. Essentially, it was ah an economic cost.
00:25:36
Speaker
to being able to vote and in that inhibit community members who might not have access to resources. But also it's important to note that those poll tax processes also came with their own levels of hostility. They came with their own levels of of the way they were used that were not just if you didn't have the resources or had the resources, but it was also a case of what you had to encounter in order to access that process. And so As we discussed earlier with Kansas, for people with trans experience, like using and and using these licenses and these government issued IDs as a tool, as a budget in many cases, it's important to be very skeptical about how that's applied, and how that's being used. And so this is obviously targeting people of, well, actually it's it's argu it's targeting people of color, but it's also strangely ah targeting older populations.
00:26:28
Speaker
Because again, there's a lot of people who are retired, people who are um seniors who do not drive. And they don't tend to have the same IDs. They tend tend to have them on them all the time. And so there's a lot of sort of many communities that are actually impacted by this that reduces their voice in and in voting.
00:26:46
Speaker
And the bigger question is who benefits when less people vote? That should always be like the idea that we're trying to reduce the number of people from voting, that should be a big concern. If if you are, in fact, pro-democracy, as as you raise at the beginning, Melody, like this idea of freedom It is it is this this thing that has to be protected and and looked after.
00:27:06
Speaker
But if the system is fundamentally wanting us to not raise our voices, if it is fundamentally working against that, then how free is it? I mean, that would be, for me, that's it that's a big problem. And i also go to the extreme and look at the worst case scenario. It's like I look at what we were talking about and it says that driver's license or current government issued driver's license, including real ID, military IDs, and tribal IDs alone would no longer satisfy voters voting registration.
00:27:37
Speaker
What else? I don't understand the difference of my driver's license and my birth certificate proving that I'm a citizen, if that makes sense. like i'm I mean, i'm and I'm being funny at the same time and facetious because I get it like the birth certificate proves I was born here.
00:27:54
Speaker
But wouldn't like at some point in time, I'm like, wouldn't if I have to have a real ID and in order to get a real ID, I got to show my birth certificate. If I got to show that to get a real ID, then what's the purpose of the real ID at this point? Because if that's not going to satisfy all your information, but I still got to come out and find all this other stuff to bring to you.
00:28:17
Speaker
I don't get it. That's the part I don't get about the SAVE Act. And it is a nuisance and a hindering because that's why you're discouraging people. Because think of people who, we're activists. So we know and we stay and we try to. But like you said, Shane, think of the older people who are like, I haven't seen my birth certificate in 30, 40, 50 years. don't even know where it's at. So now you got to go petition the county that you lived in. God forbid if you moved across the country. Like now you got to figure how to get back there to petition that county To cut you a new birth certificate just so you can go vote in California and you used to live in North Carolina?
00:28:53
Speaker
That's crazy. to i'll just add that I think it's credit just just intent that's intentional. All this is intentional to disenfranchise. Very much so. To exclude right older voters, Black voters, immigrant voters. I mean, i don't have a birth certificate that's would satisfy any any poll here or whatever, or natural naturalization certificate, which i I think I know where it is. I mean, I do have a passport, but i again, i think that's all on purpose and and and serves to benefit certain folks, and we all know who they are.
Criminalization of Protests
00:29:34
Speaker
i mean, I was hatched, so there's no, i like this is my bad big challenge. Oh, Shane. Not too hard. It's like Stewie Griffin said, i thought you were just congealed from the gutter. That's not right. That's not right. That's family guy reference. Yes. I love what Stewie referenced. Speaking of power. amazing People in power.
00:29:59
Speaker
Power always tolerates protests until it doesn't. And historically, when a movement starts gaining traction... the system tightens its grip.
00:30:10
Speaker
As of late last month, the DOJ announced a new indictment charging 30 additional people for their roles in the anti-ice protests at a Minnesota church.
00:30:23
Speaker
The indictment, which occurred in early 2026, previously resulted in charges against former CNN anchor Don Lemon and no others for conspiracy against religious freedoms.
00:30:37
Speaker
Are we seeing an escalation on how protests are handled federally? And what message does this send ahead of the heated election cycle to other journalists and peaceful protesters?
00:30:50
Speaker
Deeply troubling. as far as I'm concerned, that they are doing this under a religious it religious freedoms ruling or a religious freedoms complaint, simply because that is both unrelated, which I think is important to the demonstration, or the or the or the or the relationship to the institution.
00:31:12
Speaker
It was not there to specifically, and certainly ah my understanding is, and even listening to the video, it did not in any way antagonize the faith nor the faith participants. It antagonized specifically ICE, again, the the law enforcement agency that is that is that is attacking immigrants.
00:31:30
Speaker
And that is all, right? So that was the specific nature of of the of the demonstration. So doing it under religious freedoms is really complicated, but...
00:31:41
Speaker
It sounds like they are looking for any ways they can to punish people who are antagonizing or or working in dissent of the ICE raids. And Melody, the reason i I would love to hear your thoughts on this is being in Minneapolis during this time, what kind of feeling and vibe and overall these types of incidents have elicited from the local activist community, if you're hearing things around that?
00:32:08
Speaker
Yeah, I mean, the church, the church operation was wild to hear about and to witness because just as you said, like there was a a minister of a church, I think in St. Paul, who was found to be not only in just a ah member of ICE, but like a a regional leader.
00:32:29
Speaker
for part of the operations. And the community showed up and peacefully protested and all of those folks were arrested and just were, think, released today or yesterday.
00:32:43
Speaker
i don't think all of them were, but I think some of them were. And I think Twin Cities folks have done an incredible job writ large of organizing, of showing up, ah protesting, and occupying spaces where ICE agents have also been occupying.
00:33:07
Speaker
is like several underground networks of citizen ah or not citizen, but rather civilian observers who are blow whistles and who have signal chats open, alerting neighbors, requesting rapid response to certain neighborhoods where they're spotted.
00:33:29
Speaker
mean, i mean We were continuing to to deal with this, even even though the the project has technically been been stated in the media as having been, it's it's over, right? And it's it's like actually not.
00:33:49
Speaker
We're seeing... more and more like military style vehicles coming into our Whipple Federal Building where ICE is operating out of.
00:34:00
Speaker
We're seeing a lot of different tactics being deployed. They're kind of disseminating out from the city centers into the suburbs and doing the same sorts of things.
00:34:12
Speaker
So i think we're going to continue to see These things happened for a long time. I mean, they shot two protests. They shot and killed two protesters in the Twin Cities.
00:34:23
Speaker
They've killed more people across the country who were peacefully protesting as well. And that's s fascism, baby. it's It's wild and it's crazy and it's destabilizing to individuals and to communities.
00:34:41
Speaker
And we're still here, like, fighting back as best we can providing mutual aid, trying to get our elected officials to give a shit. And the protesting is continuing to happen despite folks getting arrested illegally.
00:35:00
Speaker
so That's where we are. Well, I want to continue that conversation. We're going to continue it. We're going to go to break here for a minute, but we're going to come back because I want to continue this melody a little bit because it's certainly tied into one of our first questions coming in from the mailbag.
00:35:14
Speaker
And I think just continuing in that line of conversation because there's there's so much unpack and certainly I know i many in in my communities, we admire and our support for much of the dissent going on there in Minneapolis-St. Paul with the organizers has been incredible. The commitment to innovative strategies, a community-based strategies, really staying on top of those conversations, which is powerful. And I think that there's more we want to talk about ah that right after this break.
00:35:45
Speaker
So we'll see you right in minute.
00:35:53
Speaker
And welcome back to Power Beyond Pride. I am Maddie Bynum sitting here with my amazing co-host Shane, Melody, and Daniel. And before we went to break, we were talking about how the DOJ has issued more indictments dealing with the the pro peaceful. And we have to continue to keep saying peaceful protests.
00:36:15
Speaker
that happened in Minnesota. But I also want to bring in our first question from the back because it actually goes along with it. So the question is, at what point does peaceful protest become something the government treats as a criminal? as criminal And I guess, I mean, to be honest, to tie back into what we're talking about, I think is...
00:36:37
Speaker
This is that point. I mean, because, well, first off, let's be honest, the government has never shied away from weaponizing the law against whoever they don't agree with or don't agree with them in any way, form or fashion. And that's something that we've seen at all times. But I think it's interesting now because...
00:36:54
Speaker
It reminds me back of the 30s and the twenty s whenever the government was more of a mob, mafia type situation. and now, because it's like, how are you now in the place where you can tell the Associated Press what they can and can't say? or you can press charges on someone like Don Lemon, who wasn't even there protesting in the first place. Can we acknowledge that he was never there to protest? He was there to cover the protest. And so how is it and that he can get charged at this point? And these are people doing their jobs.
00:37:25
Speaker
And i I think the simple answer to the question is just, Whenever they want to yeah they can decide it's criminal because police have discretion.
00:37:37
Speaker
Prosecutors have discretion. Federal agents have discretion. They all have immunity. they can They can do whatever they want. It really is about who's in charge and how they want to deploy the crazy amounts of resources that they have.
00:37:54
Speaker
to uphold whatever narrative suits them. Full stop. But I think the big reason, is the big thing to I guess I want to dig into that a little bit, Melody, and say the reason they want to do it that way, right? Like, at the end of the day, it's fear, right? So what they're looking to do is keep those lines gray. And we see this, Melody and I organizers in areas like around bodily autonomy, and so we see this a lot in around sex work decrim and other spaces. It is to use very gray lines in the application of law
00:38:28
Speaker
because what they're looking to do is instill fear so that there isn't anybody who'll push back against the particular decisions that happen, even if they are unlawful, even if they are criminal in the case of, again, law enforcement engaging in everything from sexual assault to the homicide of of of of two individuals, although it is not the first time that law enforcement has been absolved of such responsibilities. And i it's hard to even call ICE law enforcement too. That's a whole other issue.
00:38:58
Speaker
layer and within that conversation and and how they are quote unquote licensed in this context to do their law enforcement. Those are all really fundamental because it is weak. it is It is a weak application of law And so they have to instill this level of fear. And so going after, even if they're unsuccessful, like getting back to your point about Don Lemon or other other individuals who are charged, it is not whether they are successful. It is that whether or not that ends up instilling this idea that I could be vulnerable for acting in dissent.
00:39:35
Speaker
And I think that, to me, again, i i have the utmost respect for for so many people in St. Paul and and and Minneapolis who have collectively acted in aggregate.
00:39:46
Speaker
And that may be one of the ways the strategies that is effective is doing it in large enough of a pool that it is it is hard to hold accountable that same number of people when you have a lot of people in that space.
00:39:59
Speaker
That being said, with the kind of drone technology and the kind of law enforcement technology and and the power that's instilled within the courts and the federal government, it's understandably there is a level of fear. There is a level of risk.
00:40:12
Speaker
So the conversation has to be like what level of risk people are comfortable with within that dissent and then how we better strategize and structure. Again, major kudos that the systems of following ICE agents in St. Paul and and Minneapolis have been incredible. like they They keep their distance, but they follow and record them. If they aren't recorded, then they tend to do less. They tend to arrest people. They tend to try to work their way around it to see if they could try to make their numbers. Again, numbers having nothing to do with actual reduce of criminality or challenges from our immigrant refugee communities, but simply numbers that they want.
00:40:46
Speaker
and So they're going after people who are are are just doing no harm, doing no harm, being here, and specifically causing enormous amounts of harm. And so those citizens, those neighbors, those community members, those people who are themselves taking that risk to be part of that dissent is incredibly powerful and
Community Resistance Models
00:41:06
Speaker
important.
00:41:06
Speaker
And so we we we appreciate them and we appreciate all activists who are doing that. Crip people have been doing this for a long time. Trans activists have been doing this for a long time, often working against some systems.
00:41:16
Speaker
But we've we've rarely seen them, at least in the last several decades, mobilized in the kind of force that they are today. And so I do think it is important to note, as you said, Melody, when they want, they can apply this power. Maybe it draws attention to the reality that our law enforcement accountability has never been good.
00:41:34
Speaker
And again, many communities of color, many communities in varying experiences have certainly seen this. And maybe the rest of America needs to see that too. That law enforcement is a like our government. It should be a social contract.
00:41:48
Speaker
And if we if we do not have an equitable contract, then we should figure out what what that looks like and we should demand it. I mean, I want to problematize this idea that it's law it's law enforcement or lawfulness or even rule of law. I mean, at this point, the Trump administration has demonstrated an absolute antagonism towards just judges and whoever and whoever has said, oh, you cannot do this or this is unconstitutional or whatever. And it's gone gone ahead and deported people anyway and everything.
00:42:19
Speaker
ICE isn't really about law enforcement. They're not up. lying law they're just doing rule of power right and so I just wonder if the if holding on to the trope of rule of law if this has any kind of as useful as a a trope or or in terms of narrative ah But fundamentally, I mean, I think you're what you're pointing to, Shane, and what Melody has said is is absolutely true. That really, it's it's it's it's under the kind of capricious decision of the executive branch at this point, whenever it wants to, whenever it no longer, will protest no longer, or is threatening to the the narrative or the agenda of the government.
00:43:08
Speaker
whether it's the executive branch or even Congress. Congress has been very complicit to things, peaceful protests outside of ICE. Clearly, they also attacked peaceful protests on campuses early in Gaza organizing and shut them down and crushed students. I've been thinking about this because i recently because I think we do need to be more disruptive,
00:43:38
Speaker
lawfulness has become a ah way for us to not be brave enough to be so disruptive out. So we really kind stopped this status quo because the things that we've been doing haven't been sufficient enough.
00:43:51
Speaker
I mean, I think that's a valid, it's it's ah it's ah it's a valid critique, especially if progressives, that maintaining a system that is fundamentally inequitable and oppressive or even just slight incremental shifts are not actually the the moving toward what we want to accomplish. And so there there just might be, there's certainly some some reason to critique whether or not we are playing nice by a system that fundamentally doesn't want you to survive is probably not the answer either. That being said, being in coalition and using social capital to make those changes is also part of that work, would be would be what I would say. like
00:44:30
Speaker
Pushing against the system for sure, but encouraging also communities with capital. And again, that capital can be resources, money, power, all these kinds of things. To do that will create more opportunities for success in that retaliation. So that's again, where I think St. Paul and Minneapolis have been incredible because they have brought together a very diverse coalition of communities to do that work.
00:44:52
Speaker
those, i think, who cross economic classes, racial identities, gender identities, queer identities, to do that work. And I think that is an incredible model of what the rest of the country should be looking at and building.
00:45:06
Speaker
ah We're going to move on to our next question, which is if a state can reverse someone's gender marker from their driver's license, what protections do trans people actually have left at the federal level?
Federal Protections for Trans Individuals
00:45:20
Speaker
Right now, to be honest, I feel like there's not many protections, period. The little clown horn you play when something bad happens. meh, meh.
00:45:32
Speaker
This is that feeling right now. And and i don't mean to be flipping about it. It's serious. It's very serious. There are very real reasons. I think in some ways, it's interesting to me that the nation has experienced for the first time in many, many years, multiple decades, a migratory pattern where the number of people leaving the country is higher than the number of people coming into the country.
00:45:53
Speaker
And I do know of a lot of people of trans experience, either or with children of trans experience, partners of trans experience, a variety of of families who are in the process or have left the nation. And there will be people in the more conservative avenues who are going to be like, great, that's awesome.
00:46:09
Speaker
These are people, all people bring value to our neighborhoods and the diversity of our neighborhoods is what makes our neighborhoods amazing and vital. I should also note that of these individuals that I know who are leaving, they also include people who hold the intellectual capital that make this nation also very strong.
00:46:28
Speaker
These are also community members who bring a lot of different things into the conversation. um Now, again, that's not all. And I want to make sure I'm not being very sort of privileging too much privilege in that and that process.
00:46:40
Speaker
It is a very scary moment in that way. And again, it is the test. The immigrant community and the trans-police community are the test. And if you don't find yourself on the right side of history in this test, then as far as I'm concerned, you've failed.
00:46:56
Speaker
Like you've you've failed the test about what it means to look at and create spaces of human compassion if you cannot look at what is happening to both of these two communities, specifically targeted because they are capitalizing on prejudice and bias that has...
00:47:12
Speaker
snuck in, don't know, snuck in's not even the right word, has has manifested to be much greater than it than than than I think people assumed it would be.
00:47:23
Speaker
And I think this this idea that like we'd ever you know locked out all of transphobia in the country, I think, was naive. And the idea that immigrant and xenophobic sentiments were gone was also, I think, naive.
00:47:36
Speaker
and that those have been capitalized on and and and heightened and hyped for the last two decades, really, i think is is ah is ah is is ah is is just something that should alert everybody about what their what their basic human rights look like in this nation. So again, I... What protections are left to get to the question?
00:47:57
Speaker
None. i mean, the the federal government has really, at this point, eked out and made very clear in a variety of statements. And certainly Congress has done nothing to impede that, as Daniel mentioned.
00:48:08
Speaker
any considerations there. And so there are there are there are really no protections left that I know of um around rights of trans-plus individuals. Now, there are considerations and there are individual organizations, ah some that have government funding, some that don't, that have made some abilities to address the concerns and specifically around States have done some preservation. And I think it's important to acknowledge where states have stepped in. New York, California, a number of states have stepped in. But that that doesn't mean that their funding isn't being threatened. That doesn't mean that they won't make consolidations and negotiations to that process. So again, from a federal level, none that I know of.
00:48:52
Speaker
From state levels, there are still some protections that still still remain. I definitely think that right now the the true only protection I think trans people can find is in our community.
00:49:04
Speaker
And that's something. And I know we we never want to try to challenge one another, but I do. I think I would challenge some of our viewers and just people in general. If you know someone that's trans, stick up for them because nobody else is going to it right now.
00:49:16
Speaker
And because we have taken the the the title trans and stigmatized. Well, no, I'm not going to say we have, but the word trans has been stigmatized. And and we know other incidents where a name a name or a label of people has been stigmatized to make it such an outlandish thing that I think right now, you if you, like I said, and and we have to, as a community, I said this on one of our other episodes, I don't care what color you are, at this point, the community needs to come together. Because the only way that we can protect one another is if we come together. The country cannot ah target all trans people if we don't surround trans people and keep them covered. They can't. It's the same thing. We have to band together. It's time out of stop saying, well, that doesn't involve me or that doesn't affect me. Yes, it does.
00:50:04
Speaker
You may not be trans, but someone you know is trans. Someone that is in it and connected to you directly is or may be. But the thing is, if it happens to anybody, it can happen to the next person. So we got to stop sitting here saying,
00:50:21
Speaker
well, I'm not an immigrant or I'm not black or I'm not poor class or I'm not trans or I'm not LGBT or this doesn't affect me or this is not, it affects all of us.
00:50:32
Speaker
At this point, if you are not a part of the 1%, Your ass is on in the grease. We're all in the grease together. We all, and and i but I'm being honest. I really am. I'm not even trying to be funny.
Community Systems and Resilience
00:50:44
Speaker
We're all being affected. I was talking to a friend other day and they were like, well, I'm set. Are you? Because you're not the 1%.
00:50:50
Speaker
Let's just be honest. You're not. Your job can be gone tomorrow. What do we do? i want to add one thing to that, because I think what you brought up, Matty, is actually really important, which is to say, and queer people, all of you activists and all ah all of us activists, I think we've experienced this. And I think there may be a reason to remind ourselves also of our own legacies.
00:51:11
Speaker
We did not historically look to these systems for our safety and security. And I think it's time we look outside these systems and we have to look outside these systems. So to your point, Maddie, what can you do? There are a lot of things to do. There's a lot of community efforts. There's a lot of shared resourcing. There's a lot of quiet underground systems. I do not love that we are have to having have a conversation about rekindling many of these systems.
00:51:39
Speaker
but it is necessary for the preservation and care of our communities. And I think it's important that we really have a hard conversation about what that means. That sometimes dissent is that survival and resilience, and that resilience is really only possible, obviously individuals bring their own heart and their own courage, and I wanna encourage that too, but individuals alone, that is not that is not that is not what is in my value system.
00:52:02
Speaker
And so it is really important to me that that I think about, and i and I encourage everybody listening to this, also thinking about what systems are we there creating those spaces where people can thrive in spite of a system that fundamentally does not want to see them be successful.
Podcast Wrap-up and Listener Engagement
00:52:16
Speaker
The history of this goes into anti-racism. The history of this goes into misogyny. The history of this goes into transphobia. It goes into anti anti-queer work. But it is important we tap that history.
00:52:27
Speaker
All right. Well, again, we appreciate your questions. It's so wonderful to gather from activists and icons across the country. If you have questions about your activist experience or how queer changemaking can impact your communities, send it to mailbag at powerbeyondpride.com, or you can visit and submit your questions there at powerbeyondpride.com. Or even better, send us a video at any of our social channels.
00:52:47
Speaker
We definitely want to see you, hear you, and be in community with and that's all we have time for in this reply all. Our first our first episode of the spring. So we're excited about that. So we're getting where this year is moving by pretty fast.
00:53:01
Speaker
And I am your co-host Shane. And you can follow me at shanelucas.com as well as weareagi on Instagram and frankly, any bathroom stalls between here, ah between the coasts. actually Yeah. T-room train, baby. And I'm your co-host, Melody KG, Minneapolis-based artivist and provocateur.
00:53:23
Speaker
You can follow me on Instagram at Melody KG or on Substack at MelodyKG.substack.com. And remember to subscribe and get your friends to subscribe to Power Beyond Pride on wherever you get your podcasts and check out our site at PowerBeyondPride.com.
00:53:41
Speaker
And I'm your co-host, Daniel W.K. Lee, and you can follow me at strongplum on Instagram and upscrolled. And I am Maddie Vynum, your fun-loving, laughing, warm-hearted co-host over here.
00:53:56
Speaker
And Power Beyond Pride is a project from A Great Idea, a queer-owned design and content agency. Learn more about agreatidea.com and you can follow me at MaddieSymones737 on Instagram and Maddie Vynum on Facebook. This episode is produced by Shane Lucas.
00:54:13
Speaker
And Maddie Bynum is our project developer. Our editor is Jarrett Redding with support from Ian Wilson. And I'm so glad to be here with my amazing co-hosts with the Melody KG and the Daniel W.K. Lee and the Maddie Bynum. We are a few of the many co-hosts from around the country. And so again, really glad to be in community with all of you. And you can remember to send in your questions and comments at powerbeyondpride.com and check out each of our episodes each week. And thank you for listening to us. We love you.