Speaker
But yeah, like there just doesn't seem to be very, I bet if you asked 10 people, they would have no idea. But if you ask 10 people about Poe or Conan Doyle or Agatha Christie, they would they would be able to say who those people were. Yes, absolutely. i wondered, you know, here I'm referring to her location again, but I wondered if that was in part because she was American. And she also wrote about rather than being an American author and still trying to write about european European settings and people and places. She wrote about American locations and the the way people talked in America and situations. But there again, i don't know if that's an excuse because she was extremely popular in her time. Oh, for sure. to sell a million copies in the late 19th century would have been quite remarkable. And to be required reading at the law school, like that's pretty incredible. Yeah. I wonder if there's any contemporary fiction authors who would be considered required reading it at law ah school now. I know. i know. And I thought, you know, that she must have had a very accurate way of portraying the stories and how those are some of the most difficult things in contemporary crime fiction. I just saw a conversation yesterday on Instagram between two people who write mysteries, and they were talking about, do you, you know, where do you draw the line, the liberties you take? Because in this particular author's story, the cops don't interact with the state police in an accurate way, the way it happens in the real world, quote unquote. And so they were kind of talking back and forth like, is it okay to blur some of these things that happen in the real world in fiction? And you know it came back to, it is just a story and we're going to accept some things with grains of salt and move forward with the storyline. And But because of those things, you're not going to read them in law school. So that just goes back again to how accurate and detailed her work was. You know, she wasn't taking any of those liberties, the fictional liberties. Yeah. And you think about Doyle and how he wasn't particularly interested in the detail. He wanted the historical accuracy, but, you know, it was OK with continuity errors, right? Like that that wasn't a big deal to him. So I have read the first part of the Leavenworth case, and i don't know, maybe 100 pages in, ah maybe not quite 100 pages in, but the first part is this coroner's inquest, and it is very detailed. Is it? I will attest to that. Yeah, it's very detailed. So much so that I can see why people, if they were given the option to read this book and and something else, might choose something else because it does...