
The Bulldogs in 2025 were one of the most fascinating watches in the comp — because the footy was improving… but the identity kept getting rewired mid-season.In this episode of our 2026 team-by-team mini series, Ryan breaks down the Dogs’ 2025 and asks the big question: did they change too much, too often… or was it the exact flexibility that’s building a contender?
We get into:
- The mid-season spine shake-up: Galvin’s inclusion and whether it squeezed out Sexton’s steady-hand control
- The hooker call: Bailey Hayward starting and what that meant for Reed Mahoney’s role
- The shape shift: Stephen Crichton playing “fullback in attack” with Connor Tracey sliding to centre in the red zone
- Whether all those tweaks lifted their ceiling… or hurt cohesion when games got tight
- Who exceeded expectations vs who’s “on notice” heading into 2026
- The Dogs’ projected best 17/19 with the new rule — and the selection pressure points
- A clear 2026 outlook: what has to improve for them to be a legit finals threat, not just a vibes team
Cap or Fact: the Bulldogs didn’t have a “form” problem in 2025 — they had a continuity problem. 👇
Dogs fans: was the Galvin/Hayward/Crichton role shuffle genius or too much change? And where do you have Canterbury finishing in 2026?