Introduction to 'Far At Will'
00:00:19
Speaker
G'day and welcome to Far At Will, a safe space for dangerous conversations. I'm Will Kingston. If for some reason you're not already following the show, you can find us everywhere from Spotify to Apple Podcasts to YouTube. If you like what you hear here, please consider giving us a glowing five star review. If you don't like what you hear here, forget I said anything.
Impact of COVID-19 on Society
00:00:41
Speaker
We live in a post COVID world. The way we work, the way we date, the way we communicate, the way we feel have all seismically changed as a result of that virus that in all likelihood escaped a lab in Wuhan. This is why I continue to be surprised that so many people have just stopped talking about it. Perhaps it's too painful. There are the token government inquiries, of course, usually us covering exercises.
00:01:08
Speaker
But there has been no real society-wide reflection on the way we responded to the pandemic. And we need to reflect on it, because the response of Western governments was characterised by some of the most shocking abuses of political power in history.
00:01:23
Speaker
and it was also characterised by terrifying abrogations of responsibility in the pharmaceutical industry, all in the pursuit of gigantic profits at the expense of public safety.
Naomi Wolf: Public Intellectual and the Pfizer Papers
00:01:33
Speaker
Fortunately, Naomi Wolf is talking about it. I stand by how I introduced Naomi when she was last on the show. She is one of the most important and celebrated public intellectuals of my lifetime.
00:01:44
Speaker
Her most recent and perhaps most important contribution to the public debate has been editing editing the now released collection of papers, collectively called the Pfizer Papers, Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity. Naomi, welcome back to Fire at Will.
00:02:01
Speaker
Thank you so much for having me back. I appreciate it. And what a, what a
Naomi Wolf's Political Shift
00:02:05
Speaker
kind introduction. Thank you. Of course, ah we'll will get to the Pfizer papers in a moment. I would be missing an opportunity though, if I didn't first ask you for your reflections on the recent US election. Yeah. Well, so much to say, but, um, it's, it's shockingly good news. I never in a million years didn't thought before about four or five months ago that I would be endorsing President Trump and the happy that he won. And um the the real turning point for me was the Alliance of RFK Jr., whom I know and respect greatly with President Trump um and the realignment that ah really has been brought about between kind of conservatives, MAGA, Americans, grassroots activists, and disaffected liberals, homeless, you know,
00:03:00
Speaker
people on the left who think the left has lost its mind, independence, moms, um people from all walks of life who just want our country back and want freedom back. and I know that you know I'm speaking to an international audience here. There's been so much joy around the world in kind of freedom activist circles at the hopes that a Trump slash RFK Jr. administration, Trump Vance RFK Jr. or Shanahan administration will um kind of stem the tide of tyranny ah re in in formerly free nations around the world.
00:03:37
Speaker
You said you never would have expected to be endorsing Donald Trump ah previously. And I think this is a nice segue into the Pfizer Papers story as well, because ah you were the queen of liberal America for a long period of time.
De-platforming and New Alliances
00:03:54
Speaker
and and yeah And that same group has now, I think, come after you, and the establishment has come after you in a very um ah aggressive way in terms of your story, both in in terms of both COVID and then politically more generally. I guess, how do you reflect on it? When you take a step back and you're you're thinking about it, how do you reflect on the last, say, five years?
00:04:23
Speaker
I mean, it's it's impossible to process right because you're you're quite right for people who don't know my work or what happened to me in the last few years. I did have a very established, secure position as a fixture of, you know I was a very famous feminist at you know one of the top feminists mentioned um in my generation for decades. It's very established in the liberal legacy media, columnist, commentator, et cetera. And overnight I got ejected. It's an extraordinary experience um in June of 2021 when I accurately did
00:05:01
Speaker
The kind of reporting I've been doing for decades, i i i you know my beat is women's health and sexual and reproductive health, ah among other things. And I reported accurately that women were themselves reporting menstrual symptoms upon receiving the mRNA injection. This is literally feminism 101, when women speak, listen to them, you know when they're reporting an eyewitness account of their own bodies.
00:05:25
Speaker
But I was de-platformed and smeared around the world um all at once, which I didn't even understand at that point because we didn't know that AI existed and had those capabilities. um And turned into an unperson by Legacy Media, by my own team, I'd voted for that administration. And and then this extraordinary journey in which um the only people who wanted to talk to me were conservative who wanted to know if babies and women were and actual danger and specti journalist
00:05:57
Speaker
And spectator journalists, thank you so much, that's right. um And Steve Bannon, in one of the great ironies of political history, my kind of sworn enemy, in policy terms, ah graciously gave me a platform for the next two years and then became kind of the the sponsor, godfather of this historic um effort, this great achievement. It's not mine, I was just an editor, but ah this reading of the Pfizer documents by 30, 250 doctors and scientists convened by by um myself and Amy Kelly, my colleague, ah and now published in the form of the Pfizer papers. So it's been a heck of a journey. And now I still consider myself a classical liberal, which is the sad, lonely part of it. you know like They're a handful of us, right? Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, Michael Schoenberger, people who
00:06:48
Speaker
keep hanging on, you know, RFK Jr., you know, like, I don't know what he calls himself these days, but we still believe in freedom of speech, equality of opportunity, you know, human rights, my body, my choice, right? And and it's ah it's lonely for us, but not lonely because there's been this massive realignment and we have a million new friends. They're just not who we thought were our brothers and sisters.
Feminism and COVID: A Critique
00:07:16
Speaker
I'll get you to summarise the key insights from the Pfizer papers in a moment, but I just want to pick up on ah a and in a comment there around, you know, feminism 101, right? Which is, we've we've just gone through, well, well but after COVID, or ah when COVID hit, we'd just gone through the Me Too movement. One of the big ah positions in the Me Too movement was, you know, believe all women. um And generally having a bias towards believing believing women.
00:07:45
Speaker
That wasn't the case in COVID. you In fact, you know there was this actual bias towards not believing women who were calling out symptoms from the vaccine. Why do you think that was the case when we'd just seen this movement that said that women should be believed about issues with regard to their their bodies? Right.
00:08:02
Speaker
Well, just for the record, I was never one of those feminists who said, believe all women, because in my view, that's not a nonsensical position. And statistically, women lie about sexual assault at the same rate that people lie about burglary or arson or murder, about 2% of the reports are false so across the board for all these crimes. So that's just a dumb position. um And in in reflection, I think it's part of the whole Marxist assault on the West you know to make us ideologically stupid instead of you know and give up our our Western enlightenment, beautiful principles of you know open inquiry, due process of law, and so on.
00:08:43
Speaker
um I mean, it's another conversation, but on reflection, I think the whole kind of, I've never seen an organic grassroots feminist movement take fire the way Me Too did. And I think it was like real accounts, many of them, but also amplified by our enemies. And the the result was to kind of sweep a lot of leaders off the chess board right before COVID um or in time for COVID. um I'm not saying that
00:09:15
Speaker
you know, a lot of those men didn't do bad illegal things. Clearly they did. and I'm not saying I don't believe you know in a blanket way the women who came forward. I just think like at this point in history, every time there's a mass movement amplified by social media everywhere, all over the place, you know it's a red flag, right? like and And real things can be hyped as we've seen. um So why did the last two and a half years completely trashed the idea that you should listen to women um because the last two and a half years completely trashed the notion of any consistency whatsoever.
Media Accountability During the Pandemic
00:09:56
Speaker
On the left or in the legacy media, you know we were who's done the journalism, the real journalism of the last three years? It hasn't been journalists. It hasn't been my colleagues on on the the
00:10:09
Speaker
liberal legacy media side of the aisle. i mean Everything from um lockdowns being unconstitutional to the PCR tests ah being having inflated false positive results to the story I broke in my book, The Bodies of Others, about how the COVID maps themselves were based on data you couldn't look at and that was impossible to make an API out of because it was data streams from 50 different states. and And then that turned out to be correct um to the fact that um ah so much ah that that masks didn't work, you know that
00:10:46
Speaker
that it was unconstitutional to tell me in New York State I couldn't meet with more than six people in my home. um ah you know all of it All of these stories, i mean the DNA fragments in the injection, you know the the massive story that the Pfizer documents represent The Washington Post and The New York Times should be the leaders on all of these stories, and they were literally AWOL again and again and again, and repeating nonsense. I mean, to this day, you know the invention of mis and disinformation in a First Amendment
00:11:17
Speaker
free speech, Western democracy. It's it's Stalinist language, right? In a First Amendment context, it doesn't matter if you don't like it. it doesn't matter It doesn't even matter if it's not true. You can sue for libel or defamation. you know If you're a credible legacy media organization, you should issue a correction. But There is no such thing as missing and and disinformation. They invented it. They created a whole bureaucracy around it. They didn't invent it. They imported it from, you know, Soviet Russia as a concept. I mean, but my point is none of the institutions, whether it was journalism or medicine or the FDA or, you know, schools or hospitals that we in the West trusted to behave in a
00:12:08
Speaker
fact-based, evidence-based, commonsensical way with Western values of protecting life and truth and the individual. Those all fell apart. They they abandoned us. so you know And and there was like it was like a cult consciousness, which I think people are still trying to unpack, including me. So the very same people who said, I mean, I have this in, I think, Facing the Beast, you know, Sotomayor and um the other female Supreme Court Justice and Elena Kagan were writing you know decisions
00:12:47
Speaker
ah defending my body, my choice as a legal principle for abortion rights, literally within the same span of months that they wrote decisions upholding illegal what turned out to be illegal and unconstitutional mandates to inject people with an untested injection against their will, against international law, against domestic law, against you know every law, ah against the ama guidelines for informed consent and there was no awareness these are supreme court justices right no ah no self consciousness that this was a.
Unveiling the Pfizer Papers
00:13:23
Speaker
This is not logic right. Yeah the failure of journalist is obviously such a big part of the story and when you read through the papers you recognize that nothing else this is.
00:13:34
Speaker
a wonderful example of proper investigative journalism. so take Take me through the story. How did this come about? How did you approach it? Take me through, I guess, the mechanics of how you go about compiling what is an extraordinary journalistic achievement. Thank you. I appreciate that.
00:13:52
Speaker
ah well um ah Again, it was Steve Bannon who whose idea it was essentially, but I was on his platform and we were reflecting on the fact that a successful lawsuit by attorney Aaron Siri against the FDA, the US Food and Drug Administration,
00:14:10
Speaker
had resulted in the ah court order to release these 450,000 internal Pfizer documents. and the court had i'm sorry The FDA had asked the court to keep them hidden for 75 years till we're all dead. um How do you say we're totally guilty without saying that request for that kind of concealment? but and just to be clear Just to be clear, those internal documents, their emails between employees, management, what what what are those documents?
00:14:40
Speaker
No, ah good question. There are reports on the pre-emergency use authorization testing of the COVID vaccine combined with reports on side effects in the three months after the rollout. And these are internal Pfizer reports that are sent to the FDA as part of the emergency use authorization application and follow-up, right?
00:15:07
Speaker
<unk>re in the custody of the FDA. And the FDA is supposed to keep dangerous things from entering our pharmaceutical supply. right so um But Bannon and I as journalists were were concerned about the fact that these documents could easily be lost to history because A, they're so voluminous that no news organization has the bandwidth to go through them.
00:15:29
Speaker
And B, they're written in very technical language and lay journalists wouldn't understand them. So he said live, well, of course you're going to you know convene a group of volunteers who are experts to read through them and issue reports. And of course I said, yes, of course I will. I had no idea how to do that.
00:15:48
Speaker
I'm but providentially ah this extraordinary woman named Amy kelly i'm approached us she's been a volunteer and she offered to be a project manager and she's. A genius she's my current co as well and she directed this effort and she got thirty two hundred and fifty highly credentialed.
00:16:06
Speaker
doctors and scientists from all backgrounds, um to work together for ah two and a half years, nearly three years. Now, to go through these 450,000 documents, um analyze them, link to them, and issue what are now 109 reports, 50 of the most important are published in the Pfizer papers, which is and published and um you know sending shockwaves throughout the medical establishment because this documents the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history. And and i i always say you know I say that very um advisedly as a granddaughter of two people who lost a total of eight siblings to the Holocaust. It's it's just bigger in scale than the Holocaust. I'm not minimizing the Holocaust, just
00:16:54
Speaker
you know multiple billions of people were injected. And the Pfizer papers show that Pfizer knew this injection would disable millions, kill perhaps tens of thousands, um and sterilize ah entire populations or make it much more difficult for them to have healthy babies. And that's what we're seeing, sadly. this's The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is an attack on human reproduction by Pfizer.
00:17:23
Speaker
with the collusion of the FDA and the CDC and the White House. And um the bottom line, as I warned in 2021, is that in 2024, we have a 13 to 20% drop in live births in the Western nations that were most ah that were vaccinated with this injection.
Vaccine Efficacy and Regulatory Failures
00:17:45
Speaker
I guess the next question is why? So if they were aware that this was something that is potentially incredibly harmful, you know, some people may say that they did a cost benefit analysis, said that COVID was incredibly dangerous and this would potentially save more lives than it lost. Some people would say that this is just about kind of corporate greed. Why do you think they continue to roll out this vaccine if they were aware of the harms that you just mentioned?
00:18:12
Speaker
Right. I mean, you know, trust me, well, I would love to conclude that this was just the corporate greed or oversight or that talking point, which was so prevalent. No matter how much damage the vaccine was doing, the talking point was COVID is worse. Well, um, ah sadly there is no basis to that talking point because one of the, to me, biggest findings of our reports is that Pfizer knew within a month,
00:18:39
Speaker
After the rollout in November 2020, the vaccine didn't work to stop COVID. Pfizer's- As in transmission? At all. it didn't It didn't help people with COVID. It didn't stop you from getting COVID. They didn't study transmission, but it didn't it didn't work to mitigate COVID in any way. In fact, it made it worse. um Pfizer's language is failure of efficacy and vaccine failure.
00:19:09
Speaker
And the third most common side effect in the Pfizer documents is COVID. It's that's number three. And there's this critical other kind of biggest story in the Pfizer documents that Pfizer hid the deaths unlawfully of eight people who died with COVID so that they could falsely ah claim that you were less likely to be hospitalized and die if you were vaccinated.
00:19:36
Speaker
If they had correctly done the math and disclosed, as they had to by law, the deaths of these eight people, they would have had to conclude that you were more likely to get hospitalized and die with the vaccine than without, which is what many um data sets and peer-reviewed studies are finding now. and Okay, let's um unpack that. On the vaccine's effectiveness, some people would argue that the rollout of the vaccine coincided roughly with then the pandemic going away or at least becoming endemic.
00:20:10
Speaker
yeah what was was a there no You'll suggest that the argument is there is no causation between the rollout of the vaccine and then the pandemic getting under control, for whatever better term. so Will, what your listeners really need to understand is that I'm not concluding anything. And our doctors and scientists aren't concluding anything. They're analyzing and presenting the conclusions of Pfizer. So Pfizer concluded that the vaccine didn't work, that it didn't work for its purpose, which was a COVID vaccine. there It had no effect except to make COVID worse.
00:20:52
Speaker
ah my My mind then goes to if you have a pharmaceutical company that is rolling out a vaccine that not only doesn't work but has homes significant harms to people, there's obviously been an incredible failure of regulation for that vaccine to reach the market. Talk me through the regulatory side and how that actually happened.
00:21:16
Speaker
Uh, sure. But it's, i I'm sorry, I'm not laughing because it's funny. I'm laughing because it's tragic. I mean, basically you want, you want, like your question presumes what I thought would surely be there, which is a story of multiple points of failure in an otherwise functioning regulatory process. That's not what the Pfizer documents reveal. Many of these documents ah say FDA confidential at the bottom. They're all all in the custody of the FDA. Remember,
00:21:48
Speaker
Um, Aaron Siri didn't sue Pfizer. He sued the FDA because that's the, the, the, the holder, the owner of this process. Right.
00:21:58
Speaker
and it The Pfizer documents show damage upon damage, tens of thousands of serious adverse events, 1225 deaths in three months reported by doctors to the FDA related.
00:22:13
Speaker
you know according to the doctors, to the vaccine, right? That's why they reported those deaths. um They reported, advisor documents have tens of thousands of oh over 42,000 people in just three months had serious adverse events, many of them multiple serious adverse events. um tip you know We were told fatigue, chills, pain at the injection site. right That's what's still on the CDC website. The truth was they knew strokes, epilepsies, dementias, tremors, um neurological damage at vast scale and our volunteers at my request found the mechanism of the neurological damage, which is the lipid nanoparticles degrade the myelin sheath, pardon me, of the nerves.
00:23:00
Speaker
Vast amount of blood damage, thrombotic, thrombocytopenia, blood clots, lung clots, leg clots, our volunteers found the mechanism of that. Heart damage, myocarditis, pericarditis, tachycardia, our volunteers found the mechanism of that. um yeah Liver damage, kidney damage, the liver damage report and the stroke report both show that half the serious adverse events, including deaths, took place within 48 hours of the patient receiving the injection.
Health Issues Linked to the Vaccine
00:23:30
Speaker
um so this is and And then as I mentioned, the centerpiece the centerpiece of Pfizer documents is a 360-degree attack on human reproduction, whether it's you know showing that the lipid nanoparticles block ovaries um so that every time you get an injection, you're blocking your ovaries more if you're a woman because the body has no way of getting rid of this from your ovaries.
00:23:54
Speaker
to damaging the placenta to um you know maternal deaths are up 40% because of these damaged placentas to this chart in the Pfizer documents showing babies getting very sick from nursing from vaccinated moms.
00:24:10
Speaker
you know chills, vomiting, edema, tissue swelling. One baby died of convulsions in the ER from nursing a vaccinated mom ah to a chart showing horrific menstrual damage in tens of thousands of women. Horrific, like passing tissue, bleeding every day, agonizing cramps, bleeding 10-year-old girls, bleeding upon being injected, 85-year-old women bleeding,
00:24:32
Speaker
you know I mean, catastrophic damage in tens of thousands of women in each cell. This is a chart in an eight page pregnancy and lactation report that went to the White House, right? And three days after they got it, Dr. Walensky gave a press conference saying, there is no bad time to get vaccinated before your baby is born.
00:24:52
Speaker
when you're pregnant or after your baby's born. um And they had this document that showing two babies died in utero, and and Pfizer concluded that it was due to, quote, maternal exposure, end quote, to the vaccine. Okay. eighty In another section, 80% of the babies died.
00:25:10
Speaker
you know they There were 270 women who got pregnant. They lost the records of 236 of the 34 women left who gave birth. Over 80% of them lost their babies. So Pfizer knew all of this. The FDA knew all of it. it's the fta The FDA knew that Pfizer hid the deaths that they were supposed to report. right The FDA knew that Pfizer vaccinated the control group. right We all learn in eighth grade what's what's a scientific study. Here's your intervention. Here's your control with the placebo. Pfizer, at the end of their trial, vaccinated the placebo group so that there would be no evidence if the vaccinated group got sicker than the placebo group. right You never do that. and It's just all non-science. It's not science.
00:25:58
Speaker
So my point is Pfizer just waved it all through and gave them the emergency use authorization and kept as the evidence mounted up and mounted up over the course of the next three months. And and this is all we have is those three months, right? We don't have the records that continue to be kept probably up until this day. Pfizer, you know,
00:26:18
Speaker
ah ah joined I'm sorry, the FDA joined the CDC and the White House in promoting and promoting and promoting this injection. they didn't raise they didn't I don't see that they raised any objections. They didn't say, wait, what? You killed 1,225 people, stop and reformulate. they didn't you know in In May of 2021, April of 2021, the FDA knew, the White House knew. Here we have the emails.
00:26:44
Speaker
that um They were warned by the Israeli Ministry of Health and by a ah pediatrician's organization that miners were sustaining heart damage. One of our lawyers, Foya, the word myocarditis from the White House and the CDC, and there we have a shocking email exchange between 15 White House staffers, a template that raises it up to POTUS, right President of the United States, and Dr. Walensky, her own email, right Dr. Fauci, the head of the HHS, all of them in a freaked out emergency set of communications, discussing how to spin
00:27:24
Speaker
this information about the damage to kids' hearts, the way they did it is in a 17-page script which is completely redacted that then they used to not warn parents not to inject their healthy teenage kids, but to say, as you recall, all that summer and fall You should inject your healthy teenage kids and young adults because myocarditis is rare and transient and mild, which is not true. And they knew it was not
Accountability and Justice for Vaccine Promotion
00:27:52
Speaker
true. And now you have healthy young men dropping dead on the soccer field or dying in their sleep. Teenagers dying in their sleep. They knew that would happen. So I guess what I'm trying to say is that the regulatory process does not exist. It doesn't exist in any
00:28:11
Speaker
I'm not even going to say in any meaningful way, it doesn't exist. you know that ah it's like These are 450,000 pages of documentation of horrific damage to humans.
00:28:25
Speaker
and and The experiments are are are and constructed in such a way that the damage to humans is, as we say in tech, not a bug, it's a feature. So much focus on on making it impossible to have a healthy child, and which is weird right because COVID is a respiratory infection, ostensibly. There's almost nothing on lungs. There's almost nothing on oxygen levels, almost nothing on nasal passages or mucous membranes.
00:28:54
Speaker
It centers on sex in a super pervy way, I will say, right? Like they would need a vaccinated male rat with an unvaccinated female rat, sacrifice the rats and then dissect their sex organs. Okay. Like this is Mengele science aimed at disrupting human reproduction and bringing about what we now have from government databases, a 13 to 20% drop.
00:29:19
Speaker
in live births, a million missing babies in Western Europe, according to um Igor Chudov, who analyzed ah government databases. and And that's what the FDA put its stamp on. Go ahead, go ahead, go ahead. And not just the FDA, Dr. Fauci knew, Dr. Walensky knew that, you know, Alex Azar, the head of, I think at that time, HHS, knew they all had these documents. They all knew. They were all copied on the coverup.
00:29:48
Speaker
About the myocarditis there's there's no failure here this is and i've been in it i was a white house spouse i you know i worked as a advisor to a vice presidential.
00:30:00
Speaker
ah campaign and to President Clinton's re-election campaign. I know how the White House works. You can't kill a lot of Americans and sterilize them without the okay from the top because you're burning up so much political capital if it becomes known. Who got fired after this all came to light? We've been reporting on this for two and a half years. Dr. Walensky resigned three days after our report showed that she knew that she was damaging women and babies, but everyone else didn't get fired.
00:30:31
Speaker
right the The people who were in charge, um Biden and Harris, you know Harris was run as their candidate for rap for you know extending this. um So no, it there was no oversight here. was This was the intention. This is the plan. I'm rarely speechless on this podcast, but just listening to what you've just said, it's it's pretty hard to comprehend that.
00:30:56
Speaker
where rapidly running short of time, Naomi, but I just have one more question and that is now that we have the Trump administration in place, what should be the appropriate response to these crimes that you've seen? And then I guess the second part of that question is, do you actually think we will see an appropriate response? Um, well, that's a very tough question, right? Cause these are formidable enemies. Um, but they have the right people in place now. I mean, if anyone knows about this set of crimes and kind of the regulatory apparatus that allowed it and who should be prosecuted. It's RFK Jr. who wrote the real Anthony Fauci and who's been suing you know regulatory agencies for failures you know his whole career. So that's a good sign. And there are very brave advocates like Senator Ron Johnson in the US Senate
00:31:49
Speaker
who have held hearings on these issues. That said, it takes it takes like people have to snap out of their you know wish that you just need a savior on a white horse to to get justice. You don't. People have to remain um active and forceful as advocates and and hold this administration's feet to the fire. but So obviously, what should happen? The PREP Act should be done away with, but Congress needs to do that. right making it Making all these companies liable for all these lawsuits and you're starting to see them. um We need to do what Amsterdam or the Netherlands has done, which is subpoena Bill Gates, you know start initiating criminal um charges. ah But there's a lot to be done at the state level as well, because at this point,
00:32:37
Speaker
And we've we've got two lawsuits about this, but at this point, you know you can go a civil route. All these people are starting to sue and they'll get millions of dollars. That's already begun to happen. But more important is the criminal charges. And we have 50 states with 50 attorneys general. And in every state, people were defrauded into taking this dangerous injection. Crimes were committed.
00:32:56
Speaker
So attorneys general need to start filing criminal charges against um against ah the the CEOs of of Pfizer and Moderna, as well as these ah elected officials who waved through this damage to the American population. Now, Hammeh, thank you for coming on the show today, but more importantly, thank you so much for your efforts on this. Thank you so much, Will. I appreciate it.
Subscribe to The Spectator Australia
00:33:23
Speaker
Thanks for listening to this episode of Far It Will. If you enjoyed the show, why not consider a subscription to The Spectator Australia. The magazine is home to wonderful writing, insightful analysis, and unrivalled books and arts reviews. A subscription gets you all of the content from the British edition of the magazine, as well as the best Australian political commentary Subscribe today for just $2 a week for a year. No, I'm not joking. $2 a week for an entire year. A link is in the show notes.