Introduction to The Wound Dresser
00:00:09
Speaker
You're listening to The Wound Dresser, a podcast that uncovers the human side of healthcare. I'm your host, Jon Neary. My guest today is
Dr. Greg Fury's Role and Climate Work
00:00:22
Speaker
Dr. Greg Fury. Dr. Fury is an internal medicine physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Fury is also the medical director of climate and sustainability at BWH. In this role, he works to prepare clinicians for health threats due to climate change
00:00:38
Speaker
reduce the environmental impact of hospital operations, and advocate for policy changes that address climate change. Dr. Greg Fury, welcome to The Wound Dresser. Thank you for having me. It's a pleasure to be here. So just to start big picture, can you talk about what are the main environmental changes affecting our planet due to climate change and how downstream they're affecting our health?
00:01:03
Speaker
So they're actually, so they're quite broad. And I think a useful way to think about it is there are both environmental exposures that are changing in the face of climate change that have a variety of different health impacts.
Health Impacts of Extreme Heat
00:01:22
Speaker
And those health impacts can be very direct or indirect. So a useful kind of example would be, particularly it's very topical at the moment, extreme heat.
00:01:32
Speaker
So we know that with kind of.
00:01:38
Speaker
increasing global temperatures that we're having more and more of these extreme heat events. And those extreme heat events can have very direct impacts on human health. So anything from like this spectrum of what we call heat-related illness, like heat stroke, heat stress, but really the greatest burden is related to cardiovascular and respiratory impacts.
00:02:04
Speaker
aren't necessarily captured by those more specific conditions. So those are very direct impacts of extreme heat.
Climate Change and Global Health Effects
00:02:12
Speaker
on human health. But then at the other end of the spectrum are kind of the more indirect types of impacts. And so an example of that would be changes in vector-borne diseases as a result of climate changes impacts on the ecology of natural systems that make kind of the environment
00:02:37
Speaker
capable of supporting different insect vectors of disease. And as that changes over time, then the people who are exposed to those diseases is also changing. And then kind of like a very, like the very far end of that spectrum would be things like
00:02:56
Speaker
mass migration as a consequence of extended changes in the environment as a result of climate change. For example, if you have areas that are experiencing year after year higher incidence of drought as a consequence of global climate change, then people may be forced to move from those places
00:03:18
Speaker
to other locations, and we know that just that kind of forced migration is in of itself associated with a variety of adverse health impacts, both anything from kind of like mental health to physical health that result from being in that kind of very kind of transitional experience of being forced to move. So again,
00:03:47
Speaker
The impacts are broad. They affect essentially every organ system in the body, and they can occur in very kind of direct ways or very indirect ways.
Patient Behavior Changes Due to Climate
00:03:59
Speaker
As a clinician, when you're thinking about those direct ways climate change is affecting our health, are there patients you see in clinic who you kind of say to yourself, wow, this patient might not be having this problem if climate change wasn't happening?
00:04:16
Speaker
Yeah, and I think that's true across that entire spectrum.
00:04:22
Speaker
We see patients who, like I have older patients who now kind of won't leave their homes as frequently because they're concerned about the impact of extreme heat. So they're kind of increasingly socially isolated, but also they're not experiencing the kind of adverse effects of extreme heat, but they're changing their behavior in response to the possibility of that.
00:04:48
Speaker
I've made kind of diagnoses of Lyme disease earlier than I ever have in the past like so in March in New England that's pretty early to be seeing Lyme disease. And then on my own patient panel like I'm a primary care doctor and so on my own panel I have
00:05:07
Speaker
I have patients who are kind of climate refugees. They are from Puerto Rico. I have one patient who had, he has NCA adrenal disease, he's on dialysis and after hurricane Maria, or sorry,
00:05:22
Speaker
I forget exactly which hurricane it is, but after one of the major hurricanes in Puerto Rico, when they lost power across the island, he couldn't get dialysis, and so he moved to the United States as a consequence of that. And I have other patients who also have moved from Puerto Rico in the wake of some of the disruption caused by hurricanes there.
00:05:43
Speaker
We're definitely kind of seeing all of these things in practice. I think the challenge for us is to really understand how climate change is affecting the epidemiology of disease, really. So there aren't that many kind of new diseases that are coming up as a consequence of climate change.
Adapting Clinical Practice for Climate Change
00:06:04
Speaker
What we're seeing is that
00:06:06
Speaker
there are populations that previously weren't experiencing different types of environmental exposures that now are experiencing them, or because of the increased severity of those exposures, people are having kind of a greater burden of disease as a consequence of that. And so I think as clinicians, largely what we need to be understanding is how is this epidemiology of disease changing? How are the patients that I care for being kind of impacted in new ways
00:06:35
Speaker
and how do I then need to think about not only that risk from a diagnostic standpoint, so I'm like making sure that I guess I should be thinking about Lyme disease in March when I normally wouldn't have or previously wouldn't have, but also kind of from a counseling perspective, so helping our patients understand like what are the new risks that they are kind of experiencing and how do they need to prepare for that.
00:07:01
Speaker
So I want to zone in on hospital systems, for instance, for a second. I've heard you talk about emissions associated with hospital systems. The term I've heard uses scopes of emissions. Can you talk about the three scopes of emissions in hospital systems?
Hospital Emissions and Environmental Challenges
00:07:19
Speaker
Yeah, so and it's not just unique to hospital systems. This is a kind of like well accepted way of kind of categorizing the different types of emissions from any sort of from any sort of
00:07:35
Speaker
industry or organization or even kind of your own like personal your own kind of like individual kind of impact on the environment but so scope one so it's basically about just three groups scope one scope two and scope three.
00:07:51
Speaker
Scope one, those are emissions that are attributable to on-site fossil fuel combustion. So you're actually, you as an organization are directly contributing emissions into the atmosphere. It doesn't have to just be CO2. It can be any other gas that kind of contributes to the greenhouse effect. But so that could be things like
00:08:19
Speaker
burning natural gas at your facility for heat and power. It could be
00:08:27
Speaker
you're like the diesel or gasoline that you use in your vehicle fleet. So you're responsible for actually kind of like combusting that material and contributing the emissions into the atmosphere. In medicine there are a few kind of like unique scope one greenhouse gases and largely those are anesthetic gases which are very potent greenhouse gases. They have hundreds to thousands times the
00:08:54
Speaker
global warming potential of CO2. And then there's some other gases that are commonly used in modern medicine that are very potent greenhouse gases. SF6 is another example. So that's scope one. Scope two is essentially emissions that are attributed to energy that you purchase. So the most kind of substantial contributor there is just electricity, right?
00:09:22
Speaker
buying electricity from the utility somewhere else there is a plant that is either that may be using fossil fuels to essentially produce that electricity. So those are your kind of scope two emissions associated with purchased energy, the other kind of purchase energy that is common for big health systems would be
00:09:46
Speaker
um steam so we kind of buy steam both as to heat our facilities but also um for things like sterilization so that would be also also fall into kind of like scope two and then scope three is kind of everything else that's and is largely made up by kind of our supply chain so all of the emissions that are associated with
00:10:06
Speaker
the kind of manufacturing distribution and disposal of all the supplies and kind of other materials that are used in modern medicine. So and then that includes not only just kind of the kind of supplies that are being used directly in patient care, but also all the desks that you buy and the computers that you purchase and all the kind of
00:10:33
Speaker
construction that's done to either kind of build new buildings or renovate old buildings. And then there's some other things that fall into those categories as well. Big ones would be kind of the actual energy associated with the disposal of your waste, transportation, both for for employees, both just commuting to and from work, but also business travel, all those things kind of fall into scope three.
00:11:02
Speaker
So yeah, scope one seems like it's more under the control of the hospital system compared to the other scopes. So as a climate health specialist, how much do you feel of your time and effort is allocated to reducing emissions and what's going on inside the hospital walls versus trying to do either greater advocacy work or greater work with your supply chain outside the hospital walls to lower emissions?
00:11:30
Speaker
Yeah, it's a great question. So first, I think it's helpful to understand kind of like what the relative proportion of the contribution it comes is from each of those scopes, because it influences to some extent, how much time and energy we we place on each of them. But first of all, I completely agree that the scope one and scope two are far more under the direct control
00:11:54
Speaker
of a health system or a hospital because they can choose what energy source they use to some extent. But those emissions from Scope 1 and 2 combined typically represent maybe at most 20% of a health system's total
00:12:14
Speaker
Carbon footprint and it ends a little bit on the kind of what type of hospital you're talking about and whether you're talking about a hospital or an outpatient clinic. It that influences the contribution to some extent but you can think of kind of like maybe 20% as a good. General kind of like approximation of.
00:12:33
Speaker
the contribution from scope one and scope two for kind of healthcare delivery. Um, and, and so I'm fortunate. I work at a health system that has like a really kind of robust team that's focused specifically on energy use, um, and energy procurement. And so they spend all their time thinking about this. Um, and for scope one, they're, they're,
00:13:04
Speaker
The challenge is that many health systems now rely on natural gas for heating and for steam production. And there aren't great alternatives out there at the moment. It's hard to, although there are hospitals that are beginning to do this, kind of go all electric, but it depends a lot on what part of the country you are in, whether how feasible that is and how expensive it is.
00:13:33
Speaker
So there aren't great options for kind of like getting away from natural gas Quite at the moment. Um Sorry, could you just clarify like what you mean when you say all electric? Um, because I feel like yeah, so so some health systems or like so it's it's felt that because electricity can be generated using kind of like renewable sources of energy that if you kind of rely
00:14:00
Speaker
solely on electricity for heating, powering, and cooling your facilities. And there's the opportunity to really reduce your emissions associated with that energy. So many hospitals are beginning to use things like electric boilers to produce energy or electric heat powered heat pumps, essentially.
00:14:28
Speaker
So there's a way to kind of like rely on electricity to provide all those energy needs, but again for hospitals, particularly hospitals that already are built kind of like retrofitting them to go out to be kind of.
00:14:44
Speaker
dependent only on electric sources of energy is pretty complicated at this point in time. But it's an important goal and one that I think health systems and the healthcare sector are really going to need to begin to address, as are all sectors, in order to find a way to address our scope one and two emissions.
00:15:07
Speaker
Um, so yeah, then, then thinking about like the scope three, uh, especially when you're thinking like, you know, outside the hospital walls, how much of your work do you feel like really depends on, on policy and like, like health, uh, like policymakers at the state or federal level?
Healthcare Waste Management and Policy Needs
00:15:25
Speaker
Yeah, that's a great question. Um, I mean, at first of all, as we think about scope three, a useful way to think about it is the same way we think about
00:15:35
Speaker
sustainability more broadly, right? And kind of the whole idea of reduce, reuse, recycle. So there's so much waste in healthcare, right? And so if we could just eliminate all of that, and I'm not talking about kind of waste like trash, although there's plenty of that. I mean,
00:15:54
Speaker
Things that we do within kind of like health care delivery that have minimal benefit for patients, they are expensive and they're necessarily and they're associated with environmental harm as well. If we were real if we could really address all those things and just stop doing things that are are not of benefit to patients and are in fact sometimes harmful to patients.
00:16:18
Speaker
we'd know that we would be able to really reduce some of healthcare's environmental impact. That largely comes from like scope three, because remember I said that scope three probably represents 80% of our total footprint. So if we can eliminate all this kind of like low value and unnecessary care, then there's the opportunity to really have an impact on our environmental impact on our total emissions.
00:16:49
Speaker
So that's just, that's kind of like the reduced side. And I would put into that category, just kind of a focus, like a stronger focus on disease prevention, right? Like we can keep people healthy and out of the hospital and not like requiring all these kind of intensive healthcare resources. Then that too just helps reduce the environmental impact of healthcare delivery. Um, but it's so far, I think our country has not kind of taken that approach. We're not, we're not particularly focused on
00:17:18
Speaker
prevention and keeping people healthy from a policy standpoint. But I think it's somewhere we need to go for a number of reasons. So that's kind of like the reduced, the reuse side, like there are kind of like many opportunities in healthcare to, what we've seen is this kind of steady progression towards more and more use of single use disposable devices, as opposed to kind of reusable devices.
00:17:46
Speaker
A lot of that has been done in the name of infection prevention. I think it's a little unclear whether all of this transition that we've seen towards single use devices can truly be justified based on that argument. It's certainly a convenient one because who is going to argue against trying to prevent
00:18:12
Speaker
hospital-acquired infections, but it's not 100% clear that the data supports that this transition is actually having the desired benefit or impact. And at some point, if we acknowledge that there are actual true health harms associated with our environmental impact,
00:18:34
Speaker
Once you get towards diminishing returns in terms of each successive transition to a single use device, at some point, the health harms from the environmental impact of producing and disposing all those devices begins to outweigh the reduction in infections.
00:18:57
Speaker
It's challenging for health systems because those impacts are felt kind of at the population level, not directly by the like patients in front of you. And also it's like an externality, right? So health systems aren't currently held accountable for the environmental impacts of their operations that affect populations across the globe, whereas they are held accountable financially for kind of adverse events that happen directly to the patients that they're caring for. But so,
00:19:25
Speaker
All this is to say is that there are many ways in which we could be kind of reusing things more effectively and moving away from this kind of just what is becoming an increasingly frequent adoption of single use disposable devices as opposed to what we've done traditionally, which is to reuse a lot of things. So there's a lot of opportunity there. And then there's kind of like the recycle, which is really like how are we managing our waste?
00:19:59
Speaker
The big picture point is that we need to start by thinking about just kind of like conservation and just reducing the amount of kind of stuff that we use unnecessarily in healthcare. And that's not just kind of the products, but the services as well. Everything that we do in healthcare that's not directly benefiting patients is just waste, right? And it's a waste financially, it's a waste environmentally, and it's potentially kind of harming not only the patients in front of us, but like,
00:20:23
Speaker
We don't do a great job of that.
00:20:28
Speaker
everyone, the population more broadly. So from, to get back to your specific question, from a policy standpoint, I think they're kind of like very kind of healthcare specific policies that we need to kind of help address scope three emission. But more broadly, we need policies that are helping everybody address their scope one and two emissions. So, um, uh,
00:20:57
Speaker
Our scope three emissions are somebody else's scope one and two emissions. So if we can help kind of the entire economy transition to more renewable and sustainable sources of energy and kind of material consumption, then we kind of are helping every industry reduce their own environmental impact. And I think that's what's required at the policy level to really kind of create the environment that drives people towards more
00:21:26
Speaker
use of renewable energy as a source for kind of their operations, whatever kind of component of the overall health sector and the economy more broadly you exist in.
00:21:39
Speaker
So it sounds like there's a lot of low-hanging fruit within our systems in terms of the reduce, reuse, recycle. Those are things that can be done at an organizational level that don't necessarily need legislation to move those things along. But are there any specific pieces of legislation you really wanted to see move forward at the Massachusetts state level or the federal level that would really move forward your work?
00:22:08
Speaker
So an example at the state level is within our local level. So within the city of Boston, we have a program called Berto. And basically, it's an ordinance that requires owners of buildings that are over a certain size to measure and publicly report on their emissions on an annual basis.
00:22:36
Speaker
And overtime they're gonna be required to achieve certain emissions reductions and if they don't achieve them. Based financial penalties and that's a pretty powerful incentive to begin reducing emissions so we're already seeing that happen in boston at the state level.
00:22:56
Speaker
there's new climate legislation that is essentially going to be doing something similar. And again, I think it's really gonna drive change. So those types of programs that are kind of holding people accountable for reducing their emissions over time can be very effective in changing behavior and driving this transition to a greener kind of energy economy. So I do think
00:23:26
Speaker
There are opportunities for that type of legislation to be really effective. We haven't really seen something like that at the federal level. I think they've been trying to use more of a like carrot than a stick approach. And that's what we've seen with the IRA, which has been quite successful, right? And we are taking advantage of some of those IRA programs that are offering really kind of substantial tax incentives to implement
00:23:54
Speaker
energy efficiency and, um, renewable energy infrastructure projects within our own facilities. So, um, and then those are kind of like the main pieces of legislation that I think we've been seeing recently. Um, I think there are others that would be of interest, but we haven't, but I don't think I'm not aware of kind of specific legislation right now that we're that's being proposed. There is one, there is, there is, um,
00:24:24
Speaker
There is one piece of legislation that's been kind of led by actually one of the Massachusetts Senator, Ed Markey, and I forget who the other kind of co-sponsors of it are, which is really focused on addressing some of these other sustainability challenges within healthcare, focusing not only on the sustainability piece, but also on how are we ensuring that our health systems
00:24:52
Speaker
and health professionals are prepared to address current and emerging threats from climate change. So there are examples out there, but I think there are many places in which kind of some increased focus on policy would help the health system make this transition.
00:25:09
Speaker
You mentioned some obstacles to moving a lot of these climate interventions forward. One of them was infection prevention. We use a lot of single-use plastics or single-use devices for infection prevention purposes. I think I've heard you talk about
00:25:28
Speaker
At the end of the day, the way you can move these climate interventions forward is you have to pose it as a win-win, that you're going to not only have less emissions, but also better health outcomes and better hospital finances or an economic situation for the hospital.
Sustainability Efforts as Win-Wins
00:25:44
Speaker
So can you talk more about how you pitched that to administration and so forth at hospital systems to say, not only are we going to reduce emissions, but we're going to improve health outcomes and help the bottom line?
00:25:57
Speaker
Yeah. So I think, well, first of all, for health systems, I think this is also largely a moral issue, right? Because contributing to death and disease through the environmental impacts of our operations is directly at odds with our overall kind of mission and values, right? We're in the business of promoting health and wellbeing. And if we're kind of, if we're having adverse effects on the environment that are
00:26:22
Speaker
of making people sick, then we are being inconsistent with our overall goals. So I think that's an important way to first approach us, but it's true that there are many ways in which
00:26:37
Speaker
sustainability efforts can help a health system in a number of ways. One is financially and it's there. So many of these, so I work at a relatively progressive health system that has been doing work around energy conservation and purchasing renewable energy for a long time. When those efforts first started, it was not about kind of reducing our environmental impact or because it aligned with our
00:27:04
Speaker
kind of our values. It was about money. And so many of these, there are many ways in which health systems can really reduce their costs by investing in energy conservation and purchasing renewable energies. So there's some real kind of like financial opportunities there. Other examples in which sustainability really kind of aligns with some of the financial, with some of our
00:27:34
Speaker
Financial goals would be there are like this kind of same conversation about kind of reusable devices and so they're kind of two types of reusable devices there are kind of.
00:27:46
Speaker
There's some that we call, there's device reprocessing, and then there's kind of durable reusable equipment. So durable kind of reusable equipment that falls into the category of your surgical instruments that get used. They then get to our, they go to our central processing department, they clean them, sterilize them, and then they get kind of like put back into use. They just kind of like get used over and over and over and over again.
00:28:12
Speaker
There's another category of kind of reusable devices, which we call kind of reprocessing. And technically, these are devices that are labeled and by their manufacturer as single use devices. But the FDA has approved third parties who can verify that their processes
00:28:36
Speaker
allow those devices to be sterilized and reused without compromising their efficacy or increasing infection risk.
00:28:49
Speaker
So both of those have been shown to be cost saving. So reprocessing, single use devices, some examples are like EP catheters, but there are many other types of devices that can be reprocessed and reused. Definitely saves health systems money. Most of the studies looking at kind of reusable equipment when compared to their single use counterparts have also showed cost saving.
00:29:17
Speaker
So there are many situations in which kind of sustainability of lines with the health systems. Financial goals that's not true for everything. But then I think it starts to depend on like what scale you're looking at right so there are things that can be that might be.
00:29:36
Speaker
that might not support a health system's financial goals, but reduce healthcare costs at like the national level. So an example would be colon cancer screening. Right now, there are kind of multiple ways that you can screen for colon cancer.
00:29:55
Speaker
It could be with a colonoscopy. It can be with a kind of stool test. Although this analysis has never been kind of formally done, I am fairly confident that the stool-based kind of test for screening for colon cancer is associated with significantly lower
00:30:13
Speaker
Environmental impacts than a colonoscopy and so but if from the health systems perspective they make they may make more money doing colonoscopies and they do doing kind of stool based colon cancer screening it depends on a lot of factors but.
00:30:31
Speaker
but at the kind of national healthcare level, if we kind of adopted stool-based colon cancer screening as our preferred approach to screening for colon cancer, it is quite possible that we would save a lot of money, right, instead of paying for everybody to get colonoscopies. So I think it's part of whether or not this makes sense from a health system level,
00:30:57
Speaker
depends on like the scale at which you're a bit on the scale of the scale of kind of the way in which the finances and the money flows. So that's kind of like the financial piece. There's some things that clearly save money. There are others where it's not as clear. There's some things that are just going to cost money. But again,
00:31:19
Speaker
They may seem to cost money because we completely externalize the cost of the environmental impacts, right? If we kind of put a kind of a social cost of carbon on kind of everything that happened within healthcare, then that would be, it would kind of change the way we think about the financing of these sustainability efforts.
00:31:43
Speaker
But there are other kind of benefits to a health system as well. One is we're seeing that people increasingly care about this issue. And we think it's an important kind of employee engagement strategy and that people want to work for a health system.
00:32:01
Speaker
that they feel is living its values, particularly around this issue as it becomes more and more prominent within our everyday consciousness. And so I think there's a real opportunity for employee engagement, particularly at a time where staff morale in medicine seems to be at an all-time low.
00:32:26
Speaker
So working for an organization that seems to really care about environmental issues may be a way of helping people to
00:32:37
Speaker
be more appreciative of the kind of company that the organization that they work for. And I think it's like, it gives people a way to kind of engage in this and feel like they're doing something positive that's beneficial, not only for the patients directly in front of them, but kind of more broadly on an issue that they know is perfect, profoundly impacting human health. Yeah, that's really cool. I never really thought about it from an employment employee engagement perspective. And like,
00:33:07
Speaker
you know, hospital and organizational morale overall, but that makes a lot of sense that, uh, that could be a huge part of developing like a good culture at a institution. Um, and there may be kind of some kind of like PR benefits to it as well. Like I think in general, people are more aware of this issue and are often making kind of like purchasing decisions based on kind of environmental
00:33:35
Speaker
performance and considerations of whatever that kind of, whoever the manufacturer of that product or seller of that product may be. And we may see that translate into healthcare as well, right? That you can, that you can kind of increase interest in people coming to your health system if they know that you are trying to practice medicine in a way that is doing kind of minimal harm to the environment.
Engaging Patients on Climate Health Impacts
00:34:03
Speaker
I want to kind of zone in more now on like point of care patient care. I know you have like a 10 word message you also you often discuss with with patients related to climate health. Can you kind of just talk about your interactions with patients around climate change and what those conversations look like? Yeah, I think it depends a lot and there's a lot of I would say debate out there about the degree to which we should be
00:34:33
Speaker
talking to patients about climate change. And one end of the spectrum is that this is something that doesn't belong in the exam room. It's too pulpitosized. We shouldn't be kind of like proselytizing about climate in a way that's not directly related to that individual's care. The other end of the spectrum would say research shows that physicians are some of the most trusted messengers around kind of
00:35:03
Speaker
climate change and how it's adversely affecting human health and that we should be kind of using that kind of voice to help people understand that climate change is a health crisis and essentially kind of try to depoliticize the issue. And I think you can find evidence to support kind of the argument on either end of that spectrum.
00:35:30
Speaker
My feeling is I, and I think this is just may reflect kind of where I am as a clinician is I kind of follow my patient's lead and try to kind of gauge how receptive they are to hearing about it and really try to keep it focused on their health. So if someone's coming in and telling me that their allergies seem so much worse this year, like they normally kind of don't get allergies in November, but this year has been particularly bad.
00:35:57
Speaker
then I may kind of try to introduce kind of, you know what, it may be because that's because of climate change. Um, and so begin to kind of bring it up when it seems directly relevant to that person's own health. Um, if I'm providing again on primary care doctors, primary care doctors, I thought I'd do a lot of kind of like preventive counseling. If I'm talking to someone about diet,
00:36:20
Speaker
And we're talking about kind of like the benefits of a plant forward diet. Then I might also mention, you know, this also not only is it beneficial for you, but it helps kind of address kind of the climate crisis, which in itself is having kind of potential adverse effects on your health. So I try to do it within the kind of context of just discussions that are already happening around people's own health. One, I think caveat of that is, um,
00:36:50
Speaker
We, we may fall into the trap of using, like, you know, I think after working with patients, you know, people's kind of like, after you, you like as a primary care doctor and you kind of work with patients kind of longitudinally, you get to know them and you kind of begin to understand people's political leanings, then.
00:37:09
Speaker
you might be kind of like less willing to kind of engage on that with patients who seem to be kind of more right leaning than more kind of left leaning. But interestingly, there's some, some data out there that shows, you remember I mentioned that, um, overall kind of physicians are considered one of the most trusted messengers around kind of the impacts of climate change on human health. And, but if you kind of break that down by political leaning, um, essentially,
00:37:40
Speaker
Physicians rank lower amongst people who are more left-leaning politically in terms of their how reliable or how trustworthy a messenger they are around the impact of climate change on human health. Whereas more right-leaning individuals
00:38:00
Speaker
physicians are kind of like up at the very top. And so in some ways, if the goal is really to kind of use this opportunity to help people understand this relationship between climate change and health and why it's critical for us to be addressing climate change as a kind of public health threat,
00:38:21
Speaker
there seems to be kind of like the most value in talking to our patients who are more kind of like right leaning about it, at least based on this one study. But it's, it's interesting because I think many of us would say like, Oh, I don't want to bring kind of like politics into the exam room. And so might be less than kind to kind of have this conversation with patients who are a little more kind of bright leaning.
00:38:43
Speaker
But in fact, this data would suggest we should be taking the opposite approach. So I think this is true about kind of many things around climate change and health as well as health care sustainability. We have to be really careful to kind of like check our assumptions because often they're not correct and we need to be relying on kind of data and evidence to really kind of drive what we're doing.
Emotional Toll of Climate Health Work
00:39:06
Speaker
I want to get inside your headspace a little more with regards to your work about climate health. Do you feel like doing this work is like particularly emotionally taxing? Can it be kind of a downer at times in feeling that we're up against this great public health challenge that can sometimes feel like we're not making very much progress on? Yeah, it's a great question. And I think I find myself on kind of like both ends of the spectrum sometimes.
00:39:36
Speaker
On the one hand, I feel like because of my work, I'm a little bit more forced to kind of like immerse myself in
00:39:46
Speaker
everything that we hear about climate and its impact not just on human health, but more broadly. And so I don't have the luxury of kind of just like putting my hand in the sand and ignoring the news, like some other people may be able to. But on the other, I would say
00:40:06
Speaker
I feel like the work that I'm doing is kind of like, is really a way of having an impact. And so, you know, I think, like, I do believe in this kind of idea that action is the antidote to despair. And so every day I kind of do my work in this area, I feel like I'm doing something to address this problem. And I think that's challenging for people in general because
00:40:32
Speaker
it is such a kind of massive overwhelming problem. It's not clear how individuals should be engaging on this on a regular basis in a way that's going to have a significant impact. That's not to say there aren't ways that people can do it, but I think for the average individual, it's really hard to kind of understand like, okay, how is making this kind of like change my own individual behavior going to have a meaningful impact? That can be
00:41:01
Speaker
very discouraging.
Dr. Fury's Career Insights
00:41:04
Speaker
But by virtue of my job, I kind of like I every day I kind of like.
00:41:10
Speaker
I'm involved in kind of like specific actions that are going to work to address this crisis. And so to me, that's both. It's I think that kind of provides me with energy and kind of like the desire to kind of engage on this topic. But again, it's because I think there's some concrete ways in which we can be addressing the problem. And I think once people kind of can find those things, then it can be motivating.
00:41:38
Speaker
With that, it's time for a lightning round, a series of fast-paced questions that tell us more about you.
00:41:43
Speaker
So I know you went to to medical school in Philadelphia you practice in in Boston now So I want to hear your take on on Boston versus Philly like what which city you like better So I did my so I did my residency in Philadelphia I have to say I you know, I'm from Boston. So I have a special kind of affection for Boston But honestly, I love Philadelphia it's just like really I
00:42:10
Speaker
It's a fascinating city. It's very, it's kind of like a little rough around the edges, which I like, but it has like wonderful kind of culture, food. It's beautiful, lots of history. Boston has lots of history too, but I don't know. I think, you know, I'm kind of, my roots are here in Boston, but I find Philadelphia to be a really interesting city. I was sad to leave when it was time for me to move on from residency.
00:42:37
Speaker
Um, what's your go to work day breakfast? Hmm. Whatever my kids haven't finished primarily and I mostly have a kid's breakfast scraps. What's your ideal Saturday afternoon? In the winter skiing in the summer. Anything on the water with my kids. What's the best piece of advice you've received
00:43:10
Speaker
Or just a very, very good piece of advice. Yeah, we don't have that. Yeah, this is a good one for I think for people who are in medicine, the former program director used to say make everything a twofer. So if you're going to like you get pulled in so many different directions in a career, particularly in academic medicine, and you can
00:43:38
Speaker
And so you have to kind of like choose to engage and devote your time to the things that kind of benefit you in multiple ways. Because if you just try to do kind of like individual things that have like just like one kind of
00:43:54
Speaker
beneficial outcome for you. It's just kind of overwhelming. You'll end up having to do too many things. You need to find the things that kind of check multiple boxes for you. It's really good advice in medicine. Yeah, that is great advice. And lastly, which one change you'd like to see in healthcare? I would love to see kind of at a
00:44:17
Speaker
high policy level, far more emphasis on disease prevention and less kind of focus on kind of just curing disease, right? Our whole health system is kind of designed and operates around a model of really trying to kind of care for people once they're sick. I think we need to completely flip that approach and focus on keeping people healthy in the first place.
00:44:47
Speaker
Dr. Greg Fury, thanks so much for joining the show. Yeah, thank you so much for having me. It's been a pleasure. Thanks for listening to The Wound Dresser. Until next time, I'm your host, John Neery. Be well.