Become a Creator today!Start creating today - Share your story with the world!
Start for free
00:00:00
00:00:01
Sensemaking and Cybernetics in Classroom Teaching w/ Christian Moore-Anderson
4 Plays2 months ago
With the help of Teacher-Powered Schools, Socol-Moran Partners, Stimpunks, and What School Could Be, we’ve officially announced our 4th annual virtual Conference to Restore Humanity for July 21-23, focused this year on the Quest for Connection. If you’re interested in joining us, tickets start at just 50 bucks and you can find the full lineup at humanrestorationproject.org/conference
Today I’m joined by Christian Moore-Anderson. And I wanted to have Christian on to talk about the ideas that drive his teaching practice and that he shares in his book, Difference Maker: Enacting systems theory in biology teaching. While that title may seem daunting, Christian’s teaching would immediately look and feel to observers like “just good teaching.” But that's just the tip of the iceberg. Informing his theory and practice of teaching is a set of related ideas that I was largely unfamiliar with before encountering it in his book: cybernetics, systems theory, and enactivism. Cybernetics is simply a feedback loop. Just as someone steering a ship adjusts the rudder based on feedback from the ocean, so too does good pedagogy depend on what Christian calls “recursive teaching”, or a constant feedback loop of action, interpretation, and learning between teachers and students. You can connect with Christian on BlueSky @cmooreanderson.bsky.social.
Difference Maker: Enacting Systems Theory in Biology Teaching - Christian Moore-Anderson
Christian's Recommended Reading:
From Being to Doing: The Origins of the Biology of Cognition - Humberto Maturana, Bernhard Pörksen
Understanding Systems: Conversations on Epistemology and Ethics - Heinz von Foerster
The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future - Andrew Pickering
Runaway: Gregory Bateson, the Double Bind, and the Rise of Ecological Consciousness - Anthony Chaney
Recommended
![Showcase: Spotlight on Bismarck Public Schools' Empower[Ed] image](https://media.zencastr.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=112,quality=85/image-files/5c7838c8f83db700141c53b1/7c62a589-872f-48c2-9bd6-a8fb6a3ae033.png)
Transcript
Introduction and Episode Overview
00:00:00
Speaker
And you begin from that premise and then you have to think, okay, well then how do I teach?
00:00:04
Speaker
You know, I can't just tell, I can't just define things because that definition is something that has meaning for me.
00:00:12
Speaker
But by writing a definition or telling a definition, then the meaning isn't somehow made in the words.
00:00:20
Speaker
The student has to sense that in the same way they sense the water on the back of the leg and think, what is this?
00:00:26
Speaker
And make meaning of it themselves.
00:00:31
Speaker
Hello and welcome to episode 164 of the Human Restoration Project podcast.
00:00:36
Speaker
My name is Nick Covington.
00:00:37
Speaker
Before we get started, I wanted to let you know that this episode is brought to you by our supporters, three of whom are Leah Kelly, Daniel Holman, and Jennifer Mann.
00:00:45
Speaker
Thank you all so much for your ongoing support.
Virtual Conference Announcement
00:00:48
Speaker
And with the help of teacher-powered schools, SoCalMoran partners, Stimpunks, and WhatSchoolCouldBe, we've also officially announced our fourth annual Virtual Conference to Restore Humanity for July 21st through 23rd, 2025.
00:01:00
Speaker
Focus this year on the quest for connection.
00:01:06
Speaker
In stressful, uncertain times when cynical powers attempt to divide and isolate us, community and solidarity are acts of resistance.
00:01:13
Speaker
But there are no superheroes here and no simple answers to be found, only the quest for connection.
00:01:19
Speaker
In 2025, we are responding to the need for community and solidarity in uncertain times by turning Conference to Restore Humanity into a model for humanizing critical discourse and dialogue.
00:01:30
Speaker
bringing together students and teachers, researchers and doers, thinkers and visionaries to explore complex topics in education and illuminate a path forward together.
00:01:40
Speaker
To accomplish this, we're taking our flipped keynote model one step further by adding fireside chats to the conference model, moderated panel discussions followed by audience Q&A about the challenges facing education and how to overcome them from AI and ed tech in education, the role and future of the humanities, overcoming so-called divisive topics laws and book bans, and indigenous perspectives on education and more.
00:02:06
Speaker
Instead of week-long learning tracks as we've had in the past, we're including daily workshops with expert practitioners in the areas such as collaborative community building, pedagogical documentation, and rethinking assessment.
00:02:18
Speaker
If you're interested in joining us, tickets start at just $50, and you can find the full lineup at humanrestorationproject.org slash conference.
Christian Moore Anderson's Teaching Philosophy
00:02:36
Speaker
Today I'm joined by Christian Moore Anderson.
00:02:39
Speaker
I wanted to have Christian on to talk about the ideas that drive his teaching practice and that he shares in his book Difference Maker, Enacting Systems Theory in Biology Teaching.
00:02:48
Speaker
And while that title may seem daunting, Christian's teaching would immediately look and feel to observers like just good teaching.
00:02:56
Speaker
But that's just the tip of the iceberg.
00:02:57
Speaker
Informing his theory and practice is a set of related ideas that I was largely unfamiliar with before encountering it in his book, Cybernetics, Systems Theory, and Inactivism.
00:03:09
Speaker
Cybernetics is simply a feedback loop.
00:03:12
Speaker
Just as someone steering a ship adjusts the rudder based on feedback from the ocean, so too does good pedagogy depend on what Christian calls recursive teaching, or a constant feedback loop of action, interpretation, and learning between teachers and students.
00:03:27
Speaker
You can connect with Christian on Blue Sky at seymoreanderson.bsky.social.
00:03:33
Speaker
I'm Christian.
00:03:34
Speaker
I'm from England, but I currently live in Barcelona.
00:03:37
Speaker
I teach in a hybrid British-Spanish school.
00:03:41
Speaker
And there I teach IB biology, which I think Americans are quite familiar with.
00:03:46
Speaker
And I teach biology to 14 to 16 year olds and then general science below that.
00:03:52
Speaker
I've been working the last, I don't know how many years, six, seven, eight years, trying to revolutionize biology education, really.
00:04:00
Speaker
But that's kind of overlapped quite a lot with just general pedagogy, as I suppose you can imagine.
00:04:06
Speaker
Just as a quick follow-up, because I'm so curious, what's the journey that took you from the UK to Barcelona?
00:04:15
Speaker
Well, I actually lived abroad before.
00:04:18
Speaker
Before I became a biology teacher, I taught English.
00:04:21
Speaker
And when I graduated from university, I went to South America, and I lived there.
00:04:25
Speaker
And that's when I wanted to be a teacher.
00:04:27
Speaker
And then I lived in Madrid for a bit.
00:04:30
Speaker
Then I became a biology teacher, worked in the UK,
00:04:34
Speaker
for a few years.
00:04:36
Speaker
And there I met my wife who's Spanish and we moved to Barcelona.
00:04:40
Speaker
Oh, that's a great story for love.
00:04:43
Speaker
Do it for love.
Challenges and Systems Theory in Education
00:04:44
Speaker
So we're talking about the ideas in your book, Difference Maker, Enacting Systems Theory and Biology Teaching.
00:04:49
Speaker
And in that introduction, you frame your discovering
00:04:53
Speaker
systems theory as a bit of a conversion story.
00:04:55
Speaker
It seems to be like the missing piece in your pedagogy that connected students to content and you never looked back.
00:05:02
Speaker
Could you recount that for us?
00:05:04
Speaker
Because it just seems like such a powerful personal and professional moment.
00:05:08
Speaker
Yeah.
00:05:08
Speaker
And what the audience probably need to see is that, first of all, it started with with biology.
00:05:15
Speaker
And there was a lot of going on in the UK at the time, say 10 years ago, with the cognitive science revolution and teaching and all of this.
00:05:25
Speaker
And I was interested and I was following it all, but I was a bit worried because biology is a very specific subject that is famous for having humongous quantities of content and facts that you need to know.
00:05:40
Speaker
So maybe I was slightly more sensitive to things that were happening at that time because of my subject.
00:05:47
Speaker
And I was worried that the knowledge, the swing towards knowledge and retrieval practice would actually make things worse in biology because we already have too much content and you can almost, it's very easy to slip into this mode of just knowing facts and missing out on something much bigger.
00:06:11
Speaker
So it was around that time that I decided to do a master's
00:06:16
Speaker
degree in education.
00:06:17
Speaker
And I started delving into the literature on biology education.
00:06:23
Speaker
And I was trying to find then something that was specific just to biology that was deeper than just knowledge.
00:06:30
Speaker
You know, like there must be more to biology than just knowing things.
00:06:35
Speaker
So that's when I came across systems thinking, which back then it was applied to teaching biology and learning biology.
00:06:44
Speaker
So not necessarily applied to pedagogy as what I've done.
00:06:48
Speaker
That's how I first came across it.
00:06:50
Speaker
And I was fascinated by this thing.
00:06:52
Speaker
I felt like I'd found something deep.
00:06:55
Speaker
in my own subjects that would really help my students look, you know, beyond the content.
00:07:00
Speaker
There were ideas here that were key that could be generalized.
00:07:04
Speaker
And the digging the deeper and deeper, first it was the systems thinking and lots of people know that term systems thinking.
00:07:11
Speaker
And then you dig deeper and you dig deeper and you start and I found cybernetics.
00:07:16
Speaker
It was like, wow, what's this?
00:07:17
Speaker
What's this thing cybernetics?
00:07:19
Speaker
And cybernetics was a huge thing back in the 50s and 60s.
00:07:23
Speaker
Not many people know about it now.
00:07:25
Speaker
It's become this word that is associated with like computers and the Internet.
00:07:30
Speaker
But back then it was the thing, you know, everybody knew it was the new science.
00:07:36
Speaker
It was the science of so many different things.
00:07:38
Speaker
That's why the word ended up in so many different places.
00:07:41
Speaker
And now it's kind of forgotten in that sense.
00:07:46
Speaker
And there were some really, really deep ideas in cybernetics purely because for teachers, they started to get these ideas about systems.
00:07:56
Speaker
And around the 1970s and 80s, they started to
00:08:00
Speaker
applying them to the mind.
00:08:02
Speaker
It wasn't just about computers and things like as it began, systems, computer systems, automatic systems.
00:08:11
Speaker
It was like, well, hold on.
00:08:12
Speaker
What about if we apply these to ourselves?
00:08:16
Speaker
And they started what was probably the first general science of mind back
Cybernetics and Pedagogy
00:08:22
Speaker
then.
00:08:22
Speaker
What is mind?
00:08:22
Speaker
And it suddenly got really quite deep into epistemology
00:08:26
Speaker
theories of knowing.
00:08:28
Speaker
And that sort of stuff then hit me.
00:08:30
Speaker
It was like, wow, this systems stuff doesn't just exist in my subjects.
00:08:36
Speaker
It's not just biology.
00:08:37
Speaker
And suddenly I realized this is pedagogy.
00:08:39
Speaker
This isn't just content.
00:08:41
Speaker
It's us and it's learning and it's humans.
00:08:44
Speaker
And
00:08:45
Speaker
And cybernetics really opened up this kind of new philosophical way of seeing the whole classroom and teaching and learning.
00:08:53
Speaker
That's what ended up being in Difference Maker was was bringing all these ideas that were kind of left behind.
00:08:59
Speaker
Not many people know them and putting them into a narrative that maybe teachers would could then take in and, you know, revive again.
00:09:07
Speaker
It seems kind of ironic, I think, that that cybernetics idea that you were saying was developed through the 40s, 50s, and 60s.
00:09:14
Speaker
It actually seems to have a more advanced way of thinking about information, information processing, and as it relates to knowledge and the brain before the sort of storage metaphor came by as far as information storage and retrieval, which seems to be a real dominant idea, not just in education and pedagogy, but also in the computing side of things.
00:09:38
Speaker
I think for people who perhaps that cybernetics, that phrase is a little bit intimidating.
00:09:43
Speaker
Can you just explain what that is?
00:09:46
Speaker
And I guess in its simplest form, how that applies to information, the brain and learning and pedagogy?
00:09:51
Speaker
Yeah, I mean, it was Gregory Bateson who eventually said that cybernetics, he thought, had taken the biggest chunk out of the apple of knowledge in the last two or three thousand years, he said.
00:10:03
Speaker
And what his daughter went on to say was like almost a correction in the way that we see the world.
00:10:10
Speaker
So it's, like you said, it can be intimidating, but really there's a few key ideas there that once you get them, you start to see slightly differently.
00:10:20
Speaker
Cybernetics started,
00:10:22
Speaker
really as a interdisciplinary project right from the beginning, which makes it quite unique.
00:10:28
Speaker
And one of the reasons it got forgotten and was lost was because it didn't really have a university department.
00:10:33
Speaker
It wasn't a subject.
00:10:36
Speaker
And it began in the 40s.
00:10:38
Speaker
And a lot of people from different areas, there was people from psychiatry, people from business, people from physics and
00:10:47
Speaker
They were getting together and they were saying, we've got this new idea, we want to talk about it.
00:10:51
Speaker
And they called the idea control.
00:10:53
Speaker
People can get worried about this when you say control, because it sounds like some sort of authoritative thing.
00:11:00
Speaker
But it was actually more in the idea of self-control, like how do organisms control themselves?
00:11:07
Speaker
How do they adapt, in other words?
00:11:09
Speaker
Yeah.
00:11:09
Speaker
And that's when all of these people got together and they said, they realized that there was something deeper that all of science had missed.
00:11:16
Speaker
And they started working on it.
00:11:18
Speaker
At the beginning, it was in machines and it led on from the world war.
00:11:25
Speaker
So it had this kind of flavor and a lot of, some people think of it that way, as in machines.
00:11:30
Speaker
The first big book by Norbert Wiener was about the control of man and machines and
00:11:36
Speaker
And there was this big, big fad and part of where people were imagining half human, half machine.
00:11:45
Speaker
In fact, if you put cybernetics into Google, that's what the images you get.
00:11:50
Speaker
There's like cybernetic art and stuff like this.
00:11:53
Speaker
It's almost synonymous with cyberpunk in like an aesthetic kind of sense.
00:11:57
Speaker
That's really not the gist that I got from your explanation of in the book, which is why I think there might be a disconnect in like a colloquial popular way of thinking about cybernetics versus its real practical application to classroom learning and teaching.
00:12:13
Speaker
Yeah, yeah, definitely.
00:12:15
Speaker
But the thing that's quite interesting to know is that because it was such a big thing in the 1950s and 40s,
00:12:22
Speaker
Cybernetics actually gave birth to the two of the main strands of cognitive science now.
00:12:29
Speaker
So cybernetics back then gave birth to the computational metaphors and that side of cognitive science and then gave birth to the biological side, which is what I'm interested in, which is now called inactive cognitive science.
00:12:44
Speaker
So you can trace all of this back to cybernetics and you can trace artificial intelligence back to cybernetics.
00:12:50
Speaker
So there's so much there.
00:12:52
Speaker
But what was really good is finding those deep ideas.
00:12:56
Speaker
And the deep idea, the main thing back then about control was this idea of circularity.
00:13:03
Speaker
And that's going to be important for me to be able to explain something in a moment.
00:13:06
Speaker
But it meant that causes were circular.
00:13:09
Speaker
instead of linear.
00:13:10
Speaker
So like in physics, you've got a car hits another car and that hits another car or you're playing billiards and the billiard ball hits the next one and the next one and that's the end of the story.
00:13:19
Speaker
There's just a line of cause and effect.
00:13:23
Speaker
And in cybernetics, they started to study the idea of circularity.
00:13:27
Speaker
And that was in the idea of machines.
00:13:30
Speaker
So then the machines could self-control
00:13:33
Speaker
They could cause a change, for example, a missile could detect a change in direction and that change in direction would cause their thrusters to change.
00:13:44
Speaker
And then the thrusters would change the direction.
00:13:47
Speaker
And that was the very, very beginning.
00:13:49
Speaker
The very beginning was this idea of circularity.
00:13:52
Speaker
And it was later.
00:13:53
Speaker
The later cyberneticians got this side of circularity and they started applying it to human mind.
00:14:00
Speaker
And they were saying, and that's when it starts getting into the idea that's interesting for teachers.
00:14:06
Speaker
is like, what is the brain doing?
00:14:09
Speaker
And of course, the brain isn't connected to the outside world.
00:14:13
Speaker
We all know that our neurons are inside the body.
00:14:16
Speaker
They don't come out of the body.
00:14:18
Speaker
It suddenly realized that the brain is really just communicating with itself in circularity.
00:14:24
Speaker
That was the beginning, the real insight that started most of the stuff.
00:14:28
Speaker
And I think because I can see how we're headed into recursive teaching and the model that you propose over here, I want to
00:14:34
Speaker
Just take a step back because you had mentioned this word, inactive cognitive science, and that's part of the title of enacting systems theory.
00:14:42
Speaker
And that might be another term kind of like cybernetics where, okay, there is cognitive science, there's an active cognitive science.
00:14:49
Speaker
What, I guess, what is that and how does it distinguish it from, I guess it's alternative, passive cognitive science, passive systems theory?
00:14:58
Speaker
What does it mean to be inactive in this sense?
00:15:00
Speaker
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
00:15:03
Speaker
The answer that I'm going to tell you depends on the idea that I just said, that the mind is, the neurons, the nervous system is inside the body and it only really can communicate with itself.
00:15:16
Speaker
And if you start from that moment, if you start from that premise,
00:15:20
Speaker
And you say, OK, but what does that actually mean?
00:15:24
Speaker
If you follow the root of the cognitive science that had the computational metaphor, that began with the idea that you can plug computers into something or you can get now where you could get a hard drive and plug it into another computer.
00:15:40
Speaker
And now there's this direct connection.
00:15:43
Speaker
And that means that the data is directly connecting from one to another and transferred.
00:15:50
Speaker
If you follow that computational metaphor, you can start to feel that way about learning.
00:15:55
Speaker
Now, if you begin with the premise that the nervous system in itself doesn't come out of the body, so we're not connected, it's not like that film Avatar, you know, an avatar and they get the nervous systems and connect to each other.
00:16:06
Speaker
You know, it's not like that.
00:16:08
Speaker
Our nervous systems are completely and utterly closed to the outside.
00:16:13
Speaker
And they use that word closed.
00:16:14
Speaker
They use the word closed for closed to information.
00:16:18
Speaker
So if the brain, if the nerves are not coming out, I mean, even when you're touching something, you're sensing it behind the skin.
00:16:27
Speaker
Let's say there's, let's say you've got a pressure sensor.
00:16:31
Speaker
So you're touching something and you feel it because you feel the pressure on your finger.
00:16:37
Speaker
But let's say instead in the laboratory, I open up your finger and I put some vinegar on that pressure sensor.
00:16:44
Speaker
And what does that pressure sensor say?
00:16:46
Speaker
It doesn't say vinegar.
00:16:47
Speaker
It says,
00:16:48
Speaker
pressure, you see?
00:16:50
Speaker
And suddenly you realize the nervous system is not open to information.
00:16:56
Speaker
It's not gaining information in that sense.
00:16:58
Speaker
Like the vinegar is giving information.
00:17:01
Speaker
What you're doing is you've got your own nervous system that's closed off to the world.
00:17:06
Speaker
And the nervous system is just trying to make sense of what it's sensing.
00:17:12
Speaker
There's no information really
00:17:14
Speaker
in the environment.
Sense-Making in Learning
00:17:16
Speaker
The information is created when you make sense of what you sense.
00:17:22
Speaker
That's a big difference between because the computational metaphor suggests that there is data out there that can be transferred in one place to another.
00:17:30
Speaker
Whereas if you think of the nervous system as closed, you think, oh, so the nervous system just has to try and work out what it's sensing and make kind of associations between itself.
00:17:41
Speaker
When I sense this, it becomes this.
00:17:44
Speaker
It's like when I teach to my students, like when you get splashed with water on the back of your leg, how do you know that it's water?
00:17:52
Speaker
And the first thing they say is it feels wet.
00:17:55
Speaker
And I say, well, what does that feel like?
00:17:58
Speaker
And then they start thinking, there is no wetness, you know, and then they realize it feels cold.
00:18:04
Speaker
So really, you don't feel the water, you feel a sudden change in temperature.
00:18:09
Speaker
And that is the information that you've then got to deal with.
00:18:14
Speaker
It's like, oh, there's a change of temperature on the back of my leg.
00:18:17
Speaker
And what could that be?
00:18:18
Speaker
And then you make sense of that.
00:18:21
Speaker
in some sort of way.
00:18:23
Speaker
So the big problem of the nervous system is not obtaining information, but it's making sense of what it's sensing.
00:18:31
Speaker
And those things, pressure, temperature change, are proxies that your brain then makes meaning of to say, oh, there has been a change, files through past experience, knowledge, et cetera, to say, ah, something wet has hit my leg or I don't know, like a bug or something else has had that happen.
00:18:49
Speaker
And so I can see how those metaphors then, those computing metaphors of knowledge, transmission, knowledge retrieval are really unsatisfactory for describing the
00:19:00
Speaker
They're describing a particular way of teaching.
00:19:04
Speaker
I don't know if we want to call that more like a behaviorist, but like a computer operator kind of programming information on here and expecting some sort of outcome.
00:19:12
Speaker
I think that metaphor, that way of thinking about teaching has really come to dominate.
00:19:18
Speaker
Is that why you see the meaning-making inactive systems theory so angular to kind of the current vogue of cognitive science?
00:19:28
Speaker
Definitely.
00:19:29
Speaker
Yeah.
00:19:30
Speaker
For me, the key, one of the key premises that comes from what we were just saying is the, is the meaning making.
00:19:36
Speaker
If you look at computers and you see that computers don't make meaning, they don't, but, but organisms do.
00:19:44
Speaker
And computers can get data transferred into them.
00:19:49
Speaker
And we don't.
00:19:51
Speaker
And, you know,
00:19:52
Speaker
We have to then make meaning of the things we sense.
00:19:56
Speaker
And when somebody is speaking to you and they're giving you ideas, that isn't information.
00:20:02
Speaker
What happens is you have to make sense of those words.
00:20:06
Speaker
The meaning isn't coming in the words.
00:20:08
Speaker
You just hear some sounds.
00:20:11
Speaker
And then you kind of work out that they're words and then you somehow have to make meaning of those words.
00:20:18
Speaker
And you can only make meaning of those words with the other meanings that you already have within you, in your mind.
00:20:25
Speaker
And so you've got this big gulf between these two ways of thinking about learning.
00:20:32
Speaker
One is I can give you ideas.
00:20:35
Speaker
And the other is, you just cannot give me ideas.
00:20:38
Speaker
All you can do is provoke me into making sense of things.
00:20:42
Speaker
That's all you can do.
00:20:44
Speaker
You can show me things, put things in a certain way, but there's no way that your ideas can come into me.
00:20:50
Speaker
And you begin from that premise and then you have to think, OK, well, then how do I teach?
00:20:55
Speaker
You know, I can't just tell.
00:20:57
Speaker
I can't just define things because that definition is is something that has meaning for me.
00:21:03
Speaker
But by writing a definition or telling a definition, then the meaning isn't somehow made in the words.
00:21:10
Speaker
The student has to sense that in the same way they sense the water on the back of the leg and think, what is this?
00:21:17
Speaker
And make meaning of it themselves.
00:21:20
Speaker
There's this great passage that I was trying to find in the book while you're explaining this, because I just found myself underlining every other paragraph, it seemed like.
00:21:28
Speaker
But you say, in this sense, there is no information in a classroom except that which the student decides is information.
00:21:35
Speaker
Again, it's not...
00:21:36
Speaker
Floating out there in the world waiting for students to grab it or it's not being transmitted from one side of the communication chain into another one, you know, like some kind of information processing.
00:21:47
Speaker
You say what logically follows is that teachers can't simply transmit, give or tell students their understanding.
00:21:54
Speaker
and expect them to make the same distinctions.
00:21:56
Speaker
And again, that struck me as being so angular to a modern focus on clear, perfect communication from teachers into students.
00:22:08
Speaker
That's not the part of the equation that we should be focusing on.
00:22:10
Speaker
The part we should be focusing on is on the student sense-making part, which is where your recursion, the recursion in your model really comes into play as this constant feedback loop.
00:22:22
Speaker
between teachers and students to help understand their sense-making, help them respond and provoke them to respond to more information and to, um, uh, help that help equip them.
00:22:35
Speaker
Although that seems like a less inactive thought, but, um, help equip themselves with lenses to view the world as pattern seeking creatures and then test, you know, those hypotheses as you go through that.
00:22:47
Speaker
Um,
00:22:49
Speaker
Do you want to speak at all to then like what is, I guess, that alternative, that recursive alternative that you've developed?
00:22:55
Speaker
And that's the central key of the book that really seems to me, again, kind of an antidote to just an emphasis on explanation, but actually an emphasis on recursion and student sensemaking.
00:23:08
Speaker
Yeah, I'm glad you brought that up because it's reminded me to connect again from this idea that we are closed to meaning.
00:23:18
Speaker
We can only make our own meaning.
00:23:20
Speaker
And I mentioned in the book that you've got a contrast with the idea that comes from Engelman in direct instruction, which is the faultless communication.
00:23:31
Speaker
I find this interesting and I've tried reading some of what he was trying to say when he said these things.
00:23:37
Speaker
And what I find interesting about Engelman, he was coming out, he was writing around the time that behaviorism was declining, but had been important, obviously, during his life.
00:23:50
Speaker
And the cognitive revolution was taking off.
00:23:53
Speaker
And he seems to have this kind of mix between a bit of behaviorism with a bit of this kind of what was then the new cognitivism.
00:24:02
Speaker
And he says this faultless communication.
00:24:06
Speaker
A big difference between behaviorism and inactivism is behaviorism seemed to focus on it was the environment that caused the action.
00:24:15
Speaker
So you're kind of abstracting away the individual and their mind and their ideas and their meanings.
00:24:22
Speaker
And
00:24:23
Speaker
That's that faultless communication is suggesting that if you get the explanation right, you can cause that person to make meaning.
00:24:32
Speaker
So you are the environment of the student and you are causing them to learn in a precise way that you have planned.
00:24:39
Speaker
That really stems from that behaviorist way of seeing, whereas inactivism is the other end of the spectrum and is saying that there's absolutely no chance that you can control me.
00:24:49
Speaker
I'm completely closed.
00:24:50
Speaker
If I don't understand what you're saying, it's because I have.
00:24:53
Speaker
made meaning of it in a different way to you.
00:24:56
Speaker
And that's all it means.
00:24:57
Speaker
If you want me to make meaning the same way as you, you've got to help me perceive what you perceive, but you can't just force me to perceive things.
00:25:05
Speaker
I came at it from a lens.
00:25:07
Speaker
You know, I'm really, I really am a,
00:25:09
Speaker
Huge fan of Hurt Bista's writing in his scholarship as well.
Inactivism and Shared Perception
00:25:12
Speaker
The idea that why what works won't work for precisely all of these reasons, right?
00:25:17
Speaker
Like the medical model and the computational models that have become so impopular and in vogue really are flawed ideas.
00:25:24
Speaker
models and metaphors for thinking about learning because these interventions are not deterministic in the sense that, right, a chemical reaction or an antibiotic, you know, has a certain dose response in, you know, response to the conditions and the treatment that it seeks.
00:25:41
Speaker
If learning happens, it's because students make sense of it in the first place, right?
00:25:45
Speaker
He says it's symbolically mediated in that sense.
00:25:50
Speaker
And so I think it's a really important clarification, but approaching that cognitive science lens from a really dramatically different perspective, not something that would be unfamiliar, you know, to somebody who is in critical pedagogy, who's familiar with Paulo Freire and Doobie's work, or even Seymour Papert's constructionism, right?
00:26:11
Speaker
having those models be a recursive loop with yourself, reflecting meaning in the world, and then also changing your thoughts at the same time.
00:26:20
Speaker
Yeah, you know, they talk a lot about Dewey Still.
00:26:23
Speaker
I mean, the cyberneticians saw him as like a proto-cybernetician and the ideas are quite similar.
00:26:30
Speaker
And activism, which is kind of modern day cybernetics, they've been recently writing a lot more about pragmatism.
00:26:40
Speaker
And I listened to a talk the other day called The Pragmatic Turn in Cognitive Science.
00:26:45
Speaker
And they're all referring back to the,
00:26:48
Speaker
Dewey and James and Peirce.
00:26:52
Speaker
So those ideas are coming back, if you want to look at it that way, in the side of cognitive science that I think is right.
00:27:02
Speaker
You asked me before, and I forgot to really say, was like, what is it?
00:27:05
Speaker
Why inactive?
00:27:06
Speaker
Yeah, yeah.
00:27:08
Speaker
And this was a name that was used to define kind of the new split from cybernetics.
00:27:16
Speaker
And it was Varela who was like, I want to focus on the mind and I'm going to, I'm taking it down as a new route, branching off from cybernetics.
00:27:26
Speaker
And he decided to use a word from English rather than something like ancient Greek or Latin.
00:27:31
Speaker
And he likes the word inactivism.
00:27:34
Speaker
If you think of the definition, you can enact means to to carry out, but you can also enact a law.
00:27:42
Speaker
And to enact a law is to bring it into being.
00:27:45
Speaker
You know, it didn't exist before.
00:27:47
Speaker
So an activism really builds on this premise that we can only make meaning of the world through how we sense it and the perceptions that we have.
00:27:57
Speaker
And therefore, if the information's not coming in, we are creating the information ourselves.
00:28:04
Speaker
And that means we are enacting the world.
00:28:07
Speaker
We're bringing our world around.
00:28:09
Speaker
We're perceiving things in like, oh, that's something I didn't know before.
00:28:14
Speaker
And we could say, I hadn't perceived that before.
00:28:16
Speaker
It wasn't part of my world.
00:28:18
Speaker
And now I perceive it.
00:28:20
Speaker
And so my world has changed.
00:28:21
Speaker
So you've kind of brought forth in your own world.
00:28:26
Speaker
And that goes back to this idea between the faultless communication and how it's completely opposed to inactivism is that if I am the only person who can perceive and bring forth my world, then
00:28:44
Speaker
There is no possibility of faultless communication.
00:28:47
Speaker
And faultless communication would be the idea that I give you this idea and I've given it to you now.
00:28:55
Speaker
So if you didn't understand it, there must be something wrong with how you're thinking.
00:29:00
Speaker
Inactivism would say everybody thinks logically according to what they perceive in the moment.
00:29:07
Speaker
So the problem between a teacher and a student is whether they're able to perceive the same thing.
00:29:12
Speaker
Are we talking about the same idea?
00:29:14
Speaker
And once you get to that point where it's like, okay, I think we're both talking about the same thing, that's when you know the lesson's going well.
00:29:23
Speaker
And that's why it has to be recursive.
00:29:25
Speaker
That's why you have to have this continual conversation with students because you have to try and find out
00:29:30
Speaker
what they are perceiving.
00:29:32
Speaker
And equally, they're trying to work out what you're perceiving until you get to a point where it's like, okay, we agree.
00:29:38
Speaker
We agree on this idea.
00:29:40
Speaker
And that's why the more that, you know, you explain this too, and the more I'm thinking about the conversation that we've had about the parts of cognitive science that have become popular, it just becomes increasingly clear that that's not necessarily just rooted in this objective, uh,
00:29:55
Speaker
take because it's what the science says or it's because it's research-based,
Meta Content in Teaching
00:29:59
Speaker
et cetera.
00:29:59
Speaker
There's definitely some cultural ideas, some social ideas in here about the relationship and the role of teachers and students in here too.
00:30:07
Speaker
And it's something that you touch on in the book and you frame it in the sense of like, I think you call it meta content.
00:30:13
Speaker
And I know, you know, as educators are mostly familiar with metacognition, right, you're thinking about thinking, but you really get to this question of like, what is the important stuff that we're teaching students?
00:30:24
Speaker
And at the end of the day, knowing that forgetting is just as much a part of learning, what are the things that students are going to hold on to long after they've left your course?
00:30:34
Speaker
And you call this essentially the meta content.
00:30:37
Speaker
Can you explain that part of this model then?
00:30:40
Speaker
Yeah, I really like the meta content idea.
00:30:42
Speaker
So I'm glad you brought that up.
00:30:45
Speaker
And I was thinking when you mentioned it, I was thinking back to when I just started teaching and I was teaching IB biology and IB biology is famous.
00:30:55
Speaker
for new biology teachers because it's so difficult for us to teach.
00:30:59
Speaker
We go into university and we study something quite specific and then we have to study this high level course in lots of areas of biology that we're not so familiar with.
00:31:08
Speaker
And the learning curve is extremely high.
00:31:12
Speaker
And you sit there in those first couple of years and you say, if the students learn all of this course and knew all of it, they'd know as much as me.
00:31:23
Speaker
Now, is that right?
00:31:25
Speaker
Or is there something that the teacher knows even beyond that?
00:31:30
Speaker
Is there something beyond just that content?
00:31:33
Speaker
And I always thought that there was.
00:31:36
Speaker
They were, in some cases, learning topics that I was just learning myself.
00:31:42
Speaker
But if they knew all of the same facts that I had been learning and even then the understanding it, would they know as much as me?
00:31:49
Speaker
And I knew that it wasn't right because I was a biologist and there were deep ways of seeing the content that they didn't necessarily have.
00:31:59
Speaker
Now, maybe we could talk about the content in an exam in the same way.
00:32:04
Speaker
But I could perceive the content like a biologist would perceive it.
00:32:08
Speaker
I could talk about it.
00:32:09
Speaker
And it was easier for me to access new topics because I came from an angle from which we think as biologists.
00:32:19
Speaker
So you can think of a biologist as part of a culture.
00:32:23
Speaker
And this culture has a
00:32:27
Speaker
Below the surface, there's these implicit deep ideas that we all kind of share.
00:32:32
Speaker
And we use those deep ideas to interpret what we're saying and interpret new ideas and content.
00:32:39
Speaker
And that's what I realized was actually really, really important in learning was there was not just these facts because we've got endless facts in biology.
00:32:50
Speaker
It was how we think about those facts and how we perceive those facts.
00:32:55
Speaker
And biology teachers, biologists think about those facts in a specific way.
00:33:01
Speaker
They think about them.
00:33:02
Speaker
We share this way of thinking about them, a way of seeing, just like...
00:33:08
Speaker
if you go to a different culture, maybe if you go to the Middle East, and they will just, part of a culture, they have a way of seeing and perceiving ideas that you might not be familiar with because you are not from that place.
00:33:22
Speaker
And
00:33:23
Speaker
students come to us it's a bit like that I feel that we are a culture we're biologists and what we're what we're teaching is not just a bunch of facts but to to come and join our culture and say and say like what what is it that is important to you and how do you see and and we can teach them all these content but at the same time what they're seeing is like oh biology teachers think this way and and they talk this way and they are this way if I give another another example
00:33:55
Speaker
A student recently in our school was doing a survey on whether teachers had experienced paranormal activity.
00:34:04
Speaker
And they came to me and they said, Mr Moore, have you experienced paranormal?
00:34:09
Speaker
I was like, no.
00:34:11
Speaker
And they said, we knew it.
00:34:12
Speaker
We knew that all the science teachers would say no.
00:34:15
Speaker
And we knew that the English teachers and the art teachers would say yes.
00:34:20
Speaker
They had a pool.
00:34:20
Speaker
They were taking bets.
00:34:22
Speaker
Well, yeah, but where does that come from?
00:34:25
Speaker
Why did they know that the science teachers would say no?
00:34:27
Speaker
Because it's not just about the content.
00:34:30
Speaker
It's about a way of perceiving the content, about the way they're perceiving the world.
00:34:35
Speaker
And so students come to us as bio-teachers to learn
00:34:38
Speaker
from us and they come away with an idea, not just I know all these things, but they come away with like biology teachers are this way and I've experienced and I've lived in that culture for a while and they can take from that culture what they like and what necessarily is useful to them in the way that they perceive the world.
00:34:58
Speaker
That's such a great metaphor, the idea of going to an unfamiliar country or a new region of the world that you haven't visited.
00:35:05
Speaker
It's not just that you're going to take away some bits and pieces of the language or the raw knowledge that's there, but you're going to think differently about the rest of the world and think differently about home when you come back.
00:35:17
Speaker
So that's
00:35:18
Speaker
It's really not so much about the, well, it's not about the content.
00:35:21
Speaker
It's how you're going to view the world differently after having been in communion and communication with us and in this content.
00:35:29
Speaker
And you, of course, in the book, you put it in such a brilliant way.
00:35:32
Speaker
You're like, isn't this at least one purpose of teaching our subjects in schools?
00:35:37
Speaker
inviting students into an ecology of ideas.
00:35:41
Speaker
And you say, such that students don't just learn biology, they learn biology teachers and all of these ways of being.
00:35:49
Speaker
And this way of being is something our students may continue beyond our time together in the classroom.
00:35:54
Speaker
And it just really drove those points home as to like the purpose, right?
00:35:59
Speaker
Why are we all here?
00:36:00
Speaker
It's not to learn this body of facts, but it's to be different on our time leaving this.
00:36:04
Speaker
And that's what you're framing as the meta content of any course, which we can deliberately craft.
00:36:10
Speaker
It doesn't just have to be vibes based.
00:36:12
Speaker
It doesn't have to be something that students just pick up vicariously.
00:36:16
Speaker
That could be something that's really intentional.
00:36:19
Speaker
That we can spotlight, showcase, again, make a central pillar of our instruction as we go through it.
00:36:26
Speaker
So students practice and they become familiar with these tools and these ways of being and thinking.
00:36:33
Speaker
Yeah, that was a big part of that chapter in the book was actually saying that meta content, it really becomes meta content when we make it explicit to our students instead of implicit.
00:36:47
Speaker
So I have, you can't put everything into a course.
00:36:51
Speaker
We all know that.
00:36:52
Speaker
So I have a couple of things that I have as meta content.
00:36:56
Speaker
And one of them that's really important for me
00:37:00
Speaker
is what understanding is to a biologist.
00:37:04
Speaker
And understanding to a biologist has to do with how we explain things, how we explain the natural world and what we consider an explanation.
00:37:12
Speaker
And that's often to do with a causal explanation.
00:37:17
Speaker
And this then that structure I share with students and we talk about it during most lessons.
00:37:26
Speaker
It's not content that's like we've done that content, we're moving to the next topic.
00:37:31
Speaker
It appears in every topic because it's the way I see it.
00:37:34
Speaker
content and I'm saying listen there's all these facts but what do I see?
00:37:39
Speaker
I see these explanations and I would like you to be able to explain it in a way that I think is an explanation and so if I want students to do that I have to share with them what I think is a good explanation as a biologist you know what would a biologist say is a good explanation
00:37:57
Speaker
Often, I think in schools, we expect students to do well, and yet we don't explain exactly what it is we see as good.
00:38:08
Speaker
And I make a contrast here, and I don't know how controversial this will be, but with success criteria, I recognize that it depends on your subject.
00:38:18
Speaker
In biology, success criteria, I don't think would work so well because they're tied to the content and not the meta content.
00:38:28
Speaker
And if they're tied to the content, it means that every topic I have to write new success criteria.
00:38:35
Speaker
And it becomes just a kind of iteration.
00:38:38
Speaker
Instead of a recursion where it feeds back into each other.
00:38:41
Speaker
Whereas meta content is where we talk about what is understanding, what is an explanation in the first topic.
00:38:50
Speaker
And students may have a go at doing that in the first topic.
00:38:53
Speaker
And when they have a go at it, it feeds back and it helps them understand what I understand as understanding.
00:39:00
Speaker
Then we go to the next topic and it comes back again.
00:39:02
Speaker
You know, we're not writing a whole new success criteria.
00:39:05
Speaker
We say, no, no, no, listen, this is different content, but I'm telling you how I see it every time.
00:39:11
Speaker
This is how I see it.
00:39:13
Speaker
So then they have another goal and it feeds back into how they understand the meta content.
00:39:19
Speaker
And we start talking about what we're talking about.
00:39:22
Speaker
We start saying like, this is the meta content and we're, and it becomes part of the conversation that lasts through the whole course.
00:39:29
Speaker
And then that becomes a big part of what biology is.
00:39:34
Speaker
Not just biology.
00:39:35
Speaker
A smattering of different ideas or lists of vocabulary to be memorized, but these grand unifying ideas that we're going to see time and time again because we're intentional about building those things in as the pillars, the meta content as the pillars.
00:39:52
Speaker
of our course design to help students make sense and see and uncover those patterns as pattern-seeking creatures.
00:40:00
Speaker
Now, we've teed up.
00:40:01
Speaker
We've teed up a lot of these ideas.
00:40:03
Speaker
We've teed up recursion.
00:40:05
Speaker
We've teed up inactivism and systems theory and meta content.
00:40:10
Speaker
Let's just try to put this in the context of a day of teaching, a day in the life.
00:40:14
Speaker
You know, you just got off work here on a Friday, got done teaching in your classroom.
00:40:19
Speaker
How do you, what does this look like in the classroom with the teenagers and the groups of kids that you work with?
00:40:25
Speaker
Right.
00:40:25
Speaker
So, so I did, um, as I, as I thought, I did bring my diagram of how I teach puberty and I thought, is this a good idea?
00:40:32
Speaker
Is this a bad idea?
00:40:33
Speaker
But I, um, when people want to know, like, how am I teaching in this way?
00:40:37
Speaker
And you've got to think, well, most people don't understand biology.
00:40:41
Speaker
So I've got to pick a topic that people know and, um,
00:40:44
Speaker
This is something I teach to my 11 year old.
00:40:47
Speaker
So it's their level is not very high and it's puberty, but it's biology.
00:40:51
Speaker
So it's not so sure.
00:40:52
Speaker
So we just, it brings out a lot of the biological ideas.
00:40:55
Speaker
I actually really love teaching this lesson.
00:40:57
Speaker
And because we're teaching puberty,
00:41:01
Speaker
And the students come in expecting a real kind of social lesson.
00:41:05
Speaker
And I go, boom, this is a biology lesson, you know.
00:41:08
Speaker
And they suddenly like, well, Mr. Moore sees puberty in such a weird way.
00:41:12
Speaker
You know, he doesn't think about it in the way that we were thinking when he was thinking about it.
00:41:15
Speaker
You know, they thought they were going to see videos about this, that and the other.
00:41:18
Speaker
And instead, they start the whole lessons about evolution.
00:41:22
Speaker
And certainly that's a real key meta content moment.
00:41:25
Speaker
It's like, wow, biologists, you know, they're a special type of people who never stopped talking about evolution, you know.
00:41:31
Speaker
So it does have this recursion in it, this recursion.
00:41:38
Speaker
is coming back to the idea of circularity and recursion is a type of circularity where it kind of feeds back into each other.
00:41:46
Speaker
And I use that word for the model that I've made because I'm talking about how I and the students form a circular conversation where I'm talking to them, they feed back to me and I'm feeding back to them and it becomes just a conversation.
Engaging Students through Biological Examples
00:42:02
Speaker
But before I get off, I've got to remind us all that if we take from the idea, the premise, that students cannot just receive my meaning, they're not passive like a computer, they're not receivers, instead they're acting and enacting meaning.
00:42:22
Speaker
What I do most of the lesson is I provoke students.
00:42:27
Speaker
So I'm asking them questions all the time because instead of just telling them
00:42:31
Speaker
I'm provoking them to act on information.
00:42:34
Speaker
It's like, I'm telling you this, what does this mean?
00:42:37
Speaker
And then I get them to respond and then I can, from their response, I can get an idea of what they're perceiving and we go around in circles.
00:42:46
Speaker
So back to puberty then.
00:42:49
Speaker
Back to puberty.
00:42:49
Speaker
So I go into the lesson and, you know, we're talking about puberty and I start drawing the life cycle of a butterfly, which is just an egg to a caterpillar, then a chrysalis to a butterfly.
00:43:02
Speaker
And then we're back again.
00:43:05
Speaker
And the first question is like, well, what the hell is going on?
00:43:07
Speaker
Why does the butterfly have these two parts to its cycle?
00:43:11
Speaker
You know, why have two parts to the cycle?
00:43:14
Speaker
And we begin from there.
00:43:16
Speaker
We begin.
00:43:16
Speaker
So then I get to hear what they're saying, you know, and what they perceive.
00:43:20
Speaker
And it also, it brings into focus by asking that question, they bring into focus what matters to me.
00:43:26
Speaker
So I hear out their ideas and then we say, okay, well, listen, what if I tell you that the caterpillar's purpose is just to grow and eat?
00:43:39
Speaker
All it wants to do is grow and eat.
00:43:42
Speaker
Whereas the butterfly, you know, is there for reproduction.
00:43:46
Speaker
I've said this, but why would you have two stages?
00:43:48
Speaker
You know, so I've given them that bit of information, but this is the contrast between the two types of teaching I've given them now, but now I have to force them, you know, I provoke them into making meaning of it.
00:44:00
Speaker
So I tell them that there's a separation in the life cycle, but then I've got to say, okay, but what does that mean?
00:44:06
Speaker
You know, what's the consequences of this?
00:44:09
Speaker
We established that we need a growth phase because you have to be big enough to be able to lay eggs.
00:44:18
Speaker
You couldn't be tiny and have an egg that's bigger than you.
00:44:21
Speaker
And then we established that the caterpillar lives on one plant.
00:44:26
Speaker
And if it's going to find any other partner for sexual reproduction, it's going to have to get off that plant.
00:44:32
Speaker
And wings are a good way of doing that.
00:44:35
Speaker
There's a lot more in here.
00:44:36
Speaker
So we say, okay, so what if there was no growth phase?
00:44:39
Speaker
So I'm provoking them again.
00:44:40
Speaker
Okay, let's just get rid of the growth phase and we'll go straight.
00:44:43
Speaker
Why not just go straight to the butterfly?
00:44:45
Speaker
And then we establish some meaning that it's like, oh yeah, so the growth phase is important for this.
00:44:51
Speaker
What if there was no butterfly phase and we just had the growth phase?
00:44:57
Speaker
That sounds kind of simple, but for a lot of students, it's not because there's lots of humans who don't have children.
00:45:03
Speaker
And this is like a societal choice.
00:45:05
Speaker
And you've got to peel that away and say, OK, we're talking about organisms here.
00:45:09
Speaker
So what if there was no butterfly phase?
00:45:12
Speaker
What if the growth phase were too long?
00:45:16
Speaker
And then we've got to think, okay, in a population, what would happen?
00:45:19
Speaker
Like the ones who were taking too long, maybe they'll miss the time for meeting a partner or maybe they'll just reproduce too slowly compared to the rest.
00:45:29
Speaker
What if this, what if that?
00:45:31
Speaker
You know, you give them a bit of information, but then you've really got them to perceive the meaning of it.
00:45:36
Speaker
You've got to ask them questions and see what they say.
00:45:39
Speaker
This is how we begin puberty.
00:45:40
Speaker
We talk about butterflies.
00:45:41
Speaker
And then next to it, I draw the cycle of the human, which is, you know, an embryo, a child, and then puberty, and then an adult.
00:45:49
Speaker
So we've got this direct comparison.
00:45:52
Speaker
And we then attack it with the same questions.
00:45:55
Speaker
What if humans in their growth stage, you know, what if it,
00:46:00
Speaker
What if it took 30 years?
00:46:01
Speaker
What if some human was born and it took 30 years to get to puberty?
00:46:07
Speaker
What if they went through puberty at six years old?
00:46:09
Speaker
And we're starting to work out by doing that, we see, if they went through puberty at six, they would be too small.
00:46:16
Speaker
And then they would miss out on the growth phase.
00:46:19
Speaker
If they did it too late, then other organisms will be reproducing, but you're not.
00:46:23
Speaker
So you're missing out on that part.
00:46:26
Speaker
Suddenly the growth phase comes into focus and the students are making meaning of that.
00:46:31
Speaker
They probably never even thought about that bit before.
00:46:34
Speaker
And then you say, OK, so then what is puberty?
00:46:37
Speaker
And now they see that the butterfly and the caterpillar are quite distinct looking.
00:46:43
Speaker
and then the children and adults are not so distinct looking but by having that direct comparison it helps them see that we have we have a reproductive stage and the butterfly needed wings to be able to carry out its reproductive phase and it's like so what you know what's the purpose of puberty and the puberty then is is this moment of change where you're going from a phase in your life where you just need to grow and then you go into a phase in your life where you may you may be able to reproduce
00:47:09
Speaker
We go from trait to trait that we normally teach in puberty.
00:47:14
Speaker
And every time we talk about it in an evolutionary picture and we provoke and we say, well, why is it this way?
00:47:20
Speaker
And why is it that way?
00:47:22
Speaker
And what if it wasn't?
00:47:23
Speaker
You know, if it wasn't this way, using these counterfactuals, what would happen?
00:47:28
Speaker
And bit by bit, the students come to see puberty in a way that a biologist would see it.
00:47:33
Speaker
And they can later go to PSAT, we call it, where the lessons like personal, social, health, education, where they will have their lessons on puberty in a social context in which there's different meta content.
Unscripted Teaching and Philosophical Alignment
00:47:49
Speaker
I think I so appreciate that the kind of lesson that you described in my mind's eye as I sat back as the listener is immediately recognizable as just like good teaching.
00:48:01
Speaker
Classically, right?
00:48:02
Speaker
Socratically, this is just what good teaching has looked like across cultures, across generations, all of this.
00:48:10
Speaker
However, right, you have bolstered beneath all of this is a sophisticated understanding of
00:48:17
Speaker
humans as meaning makers, these concepts of cybernetics, all these things that we've brought into this conversation lead us back to a path that looks classically very similar and familiar, but is not necessarily something that in the course of a lesson,
00:48:35
Speaker
You have a vision probably where you're going in your mind with this conversation, but it can't be scripted because the success of that lesson depends on your response to student information.
00:48:45
Speaker
That's the key part of the recursion is this response from you taking the information in and then provoking the response from the students who are then taking this information in and all of that.
00:48:58
Speaker
I'm just coming back to earlier in our conversation where
00:49:01
Speaker
You had mentioned that the early cyberneticians, this was a way of understanding, thinking, and modeling in the brain, and perhaps contemporary ones in the current day, looking back at Dewey as a pre-cybernetician.
00:49:16
Speaker
And this sounds a lot like something that would happen in a classroom led by someone who is a fan, a follower of John Dewey's.
00:49:24
Speaker
So, yeah, I guess I'm just signposting this both for myself and for listeners.
00:49:27
Speaker
Kind of what we've heard in this really, I think, is recognizable at good teaching.
00:49:31
Speaker
But it would be difficult, I think, to find in a classroom that was put in such a rigid box where it said, okay, we're going to have to check these certain boxes to fit in with so-called cognitive science or research-based practices, if that makes any sense.
00:49:45
Speaker
Yeah, I think it does.
00:49:47
Speaker
I mean, that was alludes to the title of my first chapter.
00:49:51
Speaker
Yeah.
00:49:52
Speaker
Which was taken from Varela.
00:49:55
Speaker
Varela was one of the big names behind inactivism.
00:49:59
Speaker
And he loved Antonio Machado's poem that said, traveler, there is no path.
00:50:06
Speaker
You lay down a path in walking.
00:50:08
Speaker
And I took that and I, I said, basically the title is laying down a path in conversing.
00:50:16
Speaker
So it's like teacher, there is no path.
00:50:17
Speaker
You lay down a path in conversing in your lesson.
00:50:22
Speaker
I know, obviously, people should pick up the book Difference Maker and Acting Systems Theory and Biology Teaching.
00:50:28
Speaker
But what are some of these other sources?
00:50:30
Speaker
You had mentioned, I wrote down at the beginning here, the pragmatic turn in cognitive science, something that is inspiring or interesting you right now.
00:50:39
Speaker
Where else should people look?
00:50:41
Speaker
if they wanted to learn about the ideas of your work.
00:50:43
Speaker
As you mentioned this, I did write down some books because the problem, I think, with cybernetics and inactivism is there is a real lack of kind of popular writing, which is the book I wrote was trying to kind of bridge that gap for teachers in a way.
Recommended Readings and Conclusion
00:51:00
Speaker
But there are some books that are quite accessible that take you really to the heart, some that really inspired me.
00:51:08
Speaker
So I got some names here.
00:51:09
Speaker
There was two books that were actually a dialogue between two cyberneticians and it was the same journalist.
00:51:18
Speaker
So because it's a dialogue, it really, it's much easier to read.
00:51:22
Speaker
One of them is Understanding Systems, Conversations on Epistemology, and that's Heinz von Furster.
00:51:30
Speaker
The next is From Being to Doing, and that's another conversation, and that's with Matt Arana.
00:51:39
Speaker
Maturano is really important in developing an activism.
00:51:44
Speaker
Then if you want to know about cybernetics in general, there's a fantastic book called The Cybernetic Brain, and it's by Andrew Pickering.
00:51:54
Speaker
It's just such a fantastic book, and it really goes through the history of cybernetics and shows why it's so different to other ideas.
00:52:05
Speaker
And if you're more inclined towards the humanities, there is a book about Gregory Bateson, which is absolutely fantastic, called Runaway.
00:52:16
Speaker
It's about Gregory Bates, and that's in the title.
00:52:18
Speaker
And that's by Anthony Cheney.
00:52:20
Speaker
Just amazing.
00:52:21
Speaker
You read these books, and they're ideas that are just not mainstream.
00:52:24
Speaker
They're just mind-blowing.
00:52:26
Speaker
Those four books, woof, I can't recommend them enough.
00:52:30
Speaker
I will definitely link those in the show notes as well.
00:52:33
Speaker
So folks who are listening can just click on the descriptions and it'll take you to probably a publisher website.
00:52:39
Speaker
Oh, my goodness.
00:52:40
Speaker
Christian, thanks so much for taking the time at the end of your day of teaching to join me in talking about the work that you focus on in Difference Maker.
00:52:48
Speaker
It's been great.
00:52:49
Speaker
Thanks, Nick.
00:52:49
Speaker
Yeah, it's been great.
00:52:50
Speaker
I mean, I really enjoyed just talking about cybernetics.
00:52:52
Speaker
So thanks.
00:52:56
Speaker
Thank you again for listening to our podcast at Human Restoration Project.
00:53:00
Speaker
I hope this conversation leaves you inspired and ready to start making change.
00:53:03
Speaker
If you enjoyed listening, please consider leaving us a review on your favorite podcast player.
00:53:08
Speaker
Plus, find a whole host of free resources, writings, and other podcasts all for free on our website, humanrestorationproject.org.
00:53:15
Speaker
Thank you.