Speaker
As it hit the water, depending on how it hits, I mean, like I said, if it had swept the wings back and ripped them off, they wouldn't still be sitting with the plane. They'd be somewhere else and they wouldn't know what they were looking at. And you really have to go look at the photos to visualize this. They do this great comparison where they show the image, the sonar image and then next to it, like a diagram of what yeah her airplane look like and you can see that the wings are they're angled of course because wings always are but they're straight across they don't they don't face backwards at all and the sonar image the wings are definitely like angled back yeah like they weren't swept yeah And so Tony ah Romeo, he's he's like, well, there's probably a reason for that. He's because when you have sonar looking at something at an angle and moving at the same time, it creates these sort of stretching yeah of images. He says, you can even see that in the tail. He's like, when you when you correct for all the stretching, it looks like and a Lockheed Electra. yeah It looks like the plane. so which totally sounds legit to me too. So I'm like, cool, I believe both these guys. I don't really know what to believe at this point. And obviously there needs to be a lot more research. So yeah, I mean, people are right to be skeptical because Tigar has found, you know, quite a bit evidence, which we'll just talk about in a second, but these deep sea vision or whatever they're called, they're heading back later this year yeah to obviously take some more pointed images of it and just really see what they're looking at. And oh, they also didn't have a functioning camera on it when they passed over this, so they didn't get any actual like camera images. So they want to go back and get actual camera images that might show you know pieces of a wing or a number or something where they can actually match it to the airplane. Or if not her airplane, then somebody's, right? It does look like an airplane, right? like