Zencastr
00:00:00
00:00:01
Speed1x
Format
Share
Embed
Report

065 - EAA2019 - Dr. Alexander Gramsch

Archaeology Conferences
Archaeology Conferences

113 plays · Oct 6, 2019

These are selections of conversations recorded at the EAA2019 conference in Bern, Switzerland. Dr. Alexander Gramsch works at the Römisch-Germanische Kommission in Frankfuhrt. Tristan spoke to him at the RGK table in the upstarirs section of the University of Bern, the Kuppelraum. Dr. Gramsch explains the work of the RGK and talks about the benefits and challenges of using digital microscopes. To find out more info please check out :https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/germania/index

Transcript

Speaker: You're listening to the Archaeology Podcast Network. I'm Alexander Grams from Rheumuschka Management Commission in Frankfurt. Wonderful, wonderful. And you've got a stall up here in the Kuppelram. So can you tell me what the stall is? Can you describe it to our listeners?

Speaker: Well, this doll is presenting the different departments we have and the different services we offer as a research institute in archaeology. So what we do have is a large editorial department with several book series and two journals and we have a large technical department which now is called

Speaker: the Department of Survey and Excavation Technology and we're involved in several international and EU -wide research projects and that's the stuff we want to convey to our visitors. Excellent, but you were also presenting as well, so what was a session you were doing or what was your presentation about?

Speaker: Yeah, I was contributed to one session, which was yesterday, and the session with the title, New Approaches to Bioarchaeology. I myself am a proper archaeologist, so not an anthropologist or bioarchologist, but I'm cooperating with a physical anthropologist and we're doing research on traces of manipulations on human bones.

Speaker: And the thing that we are currently doing is using a digital microscope that we have at the Grzemyszka Management Commission in Frankfurt to see how we can document this in 3D. The advantage of a digital microscope is that you can have assembled 3D pictures where

Speaker: But all areas are equally sharp. There's no blurred areas. Even if you have a skull where the cut marks may be round. And so the idea behind it is to have a powerful research tool and a good concept about what manipulation traces, perimortal traces may mean on bodies.

Speaker: actions, practices that have been performed on bodies at the period when a person died and was transformed into somebody else. And obviously with new technology, always there's new challenges as well. What are the challenges with using a digital microscope?

Speaker: It takes a lot of time to get the experience of how really to record your cut marks. Many of them are visible to the plain eye. And you could use a simple microscope or just a magnifying glass to see them more clearly. But if you want to get down to the details and really to see the gesture of performing like removing flesh from the bone, for example, or removing the scalp from the skull,

Speaker: You have to figure out a work process, where to start and how to use this machine to move from one end of this cut that you see to the other to get this unblurged, to get this clear picture. Thank you very much.

Speaker: This has been a presentation of the Archaeology Podcast Network. Visit us on the web for show notes and other podcasts at www .archpodnet .com. Contact us at chrisatarchaeologypodcastnetwork .com.

Speaker

Speaker

Speaker

Speaker

Speaker

Recommended