DeepDive - Civil Court - Burden of Proof and Presumed Guilt
A YouTube video transcript from Norbert “Bob” Gostischa highlights a perceived disparity between criminal and civil court proceedings.
The speaker contends that the fundamental principle of "innocent until proven guilty" does not apply in civil cases. Instead, individuals often bear the burden of proving their innocence, particularly in situations like identity theft. The video uses the example of fraudulent loans to illustrate how victims may be treated as the responsible party by default. Gostischa argues this legal framework unfairly disadvantages those wrongly accused in civil matters. He calls for reforms to shift the burden of proof back to the accuser and advocates for stronger protections for victims of fraud.
Here are the links to the video's supplied to NotebookLM (https://notebooklm.google.com/) in the creation of this discussion:
