Become a Creator today!Start creating today - Share your story with the world!
Start for free
00:00:00
00:00:01
Monday Read: "The Right to Shun: Ghent's Misguided Jehovah's Witness Decision"
18 Plays4 years ago
What happens when a criminal court in Ghent, Belgium finds the Jehovah’s Witness community guilty of discrimination for "disfellowshipping" its former members?
In his article for Canopy Forum, “The Right to Shun: Ghent’s Misguided Jehovah's Witness Decision,” Matthew P. Cavedon explores the practice of shunning among Jehovah’s Witnesses: its impacts on believers, but also its impacts on the freedom of religion and association.
Browse our book brochure.
Recommended
Transcript
Introduction to Controversies and Shunning
00:00:06
Speaker
Life together in human society is fraught with controversies. One of the tragedies of our worldly existence is that we sometimes disagree on even the most intimate matters, and these sad occasions can lead to alienation.
Emotional Impact and Religious Freedom
00:00:24
Speaker
This episode of Interactions features the work of Matthew P. Cavadon, whose recent article on Canopy Forum explores the practice of shunning in the Jehovah's Witness community. Not only the emotional damage suffered by believers who are shunned, but also the damage done to freedom of religion and association when one criminal court found the Jehovah's Witness community guilty of discrimination.
00:00:52
Speaker
I am your narrator, Janet Metzger, and this is the Interactions Podcast.
00:01:05
Speaker
In March of 2021, the Criminal Court of Ghent, Belgium, fined the congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses for inciting discrimination and hatred or violence against former members. The case centered on the Jehovah's Witnesses' practice of disfellowshipping.
00:01:24
Speaker
While the court's sensitivity to the individual impact of shunning is laudable, its decision regrettably assaults the freedoms of religion and association.
Foundation and Beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses
00:01:35
Speaker
First, some background on Jehovah's Witnesses' beliefs and disfellowshipping.
00:01:41
Speaker
Jehovah's Witnesses was founded in the United States over a century ago and is headquartered in New York State. This Christian movement proclaims that the end times began in 1914. Given the impending end of the world, Jehovah's Witnesses teaches followers to hold themselves apart from churches and politics, instead ordering their lives pursuant to Jehovah's Witnesses' biblical interpretations.
The Practice and Consequences of Shunning
00:02:12
Speaker
Jehovah's Witnesses disciplines its eight million members accordingly. The congregation shuns, or disfellowships, those deemed insufficiently obedient. Once this happens, no one is allowed to talk to you, not even your own family. They declare that this person must be avoided because they have a mental illness that is contagious.
00:02:35
Speaker
Witnesses physically turn away from the shunned. This practice seriously impacts those subjected to it. One advocate for disfellowshipped former Jehovah's Witnesses told the BBC that she never met a shunned believer who has not experienced depression, alcoholism, suicidal feelings or self-harm.
00:02:57
Speaker
One such man, a Belgian named Patrick Hake, responded to his pain by turning to a secular criminal court. Mr. Hake had been a Jehovah's Witness for 35 years and served as an elder. He was disfellowshipped after exposing sexual abuse. Following his judicial complaint, the court conducted a five-year investigation.
00:03:23
Speaker
The inquiry gathered other former Jehovah's Witnesses and brought criminal charges against the entire Jehovah's Witnesses congregation for inciting discrimination, hatred, and violence. The court found the case persuasive. It determined that Jehovah's Witness fostered an exclusion policy among its local faith communities and thereby jeopardizes many pillars of our fundamental rights.
Legal Challenges and Court Decisions
00:03:52
Speaker
The court took the congregation to task for not considering the very adverse consequences for the victims. It held that its own duty was to stop such practices. Religious doctrine is not above the law in our society.
00:04:09
Speaker
Just what effect the court's ruling will have on Jehovah's Witnesses is an open question. The tribunal imposed a fine. It did not mandate a certain number of social interactions between current and disfellowshipped Jehovah's Witnesses or implement family reunification programs. This, despite the complainants raising the example of a man whose wife is still a member and he is ignored in his own home.
00:04:39
Speaker
For their part, Jehovah's Witnesses are defiant. Said their attorney, it's not up to the court to hand down a decision about interpersonal relationships. Our internal practices are based on what the Bible says.
00:04:54
Speaker
So it is surprising to hear that the courts now say that it's illegal to follow biblical principles. Besides, even if Belgian Jehovah's Witnesses wanted to find middle ground, they are bound by the decisions made by central Jehovah's Witness leadership in New York, where American constitutional freedoms would all but certainly protect disfellowship.
Religious Freedom vs. Secular Law
00:05:18
Speaker
Indeed, Jehovah's Witnesses in this country has a lengthy history of legally defending its more radical beliefs. One count finds a whopping 59 U.S. Supreme Court rulings concerning witness practices.
00:05:33
Speaker
Perhaps no religious sect has had a greater impact relative to its size on expanding the First Amendment free exercise of religion in Jane Raney's opinion. These effects have reached jurisprudence on everything from blood transfusions to standing for the Pledge of Allegiance, door-to-door canvassing, to calling a police officer a goddamn dragoteer and damned fascist.
00:06:01
Speaker
Jehovah's Witnesses would be able to rely on more than just its general legal savvy against American sanctioning of disfellowship. The U.S. Supreme Court has found a specific First Amendment right to freedom of association.
00:06:17
Speaker
In a case involving the Boy Scouts' previous refusal of membership to gays and lesbians, the court held, "...the forced inclusion of an unwanted person in a group infringes the group's freedom of expressive association if the presence of that person affects, in a significant way, the group's ability to advocate public or private viewpoints."
00:06:42
Speaker
While the liberty in question does depend on how public and or commercial an association is and the degree to which a person's inclusion affects its messaging, Jehovah's Witnesses is a non-commercial private organization.
00:06:59
Speaker
and the mere presence of the disfellowshipped would significantly impact its ability to advocate its purest beliefs. Moreover, the court is loathe to interfere with questions of religious discipline. In a 1975 opinion concerning how internal disputes affect church property,
00:07:20
Speaker
the court limited itself to the narrowest kind of review to what Justice Frankfurter referred to as one aspect of the duty of courts to enforce the rights of members in an association, temporal or religious, according to the laws of that association. This proclaimed commitment to reinforcing private religious obligations directly contrasts with the attitude of the Ghent court,
00:07:48
Speaker
which said it was obligated to stop antisocial practices because religion is subject to secular laws.
00:07:56
Speaker
American jurisprudence has only tacked more in this deferential direction in the years since, with recent cases extending it to employment decisions by religious organizations. Which approach is better? The Ghent style affords significant respect to the individual dimension of discrimination. It prioritizes the needs of those suffering lifelong emotional harm from harsh practices.
00:08:24
Speaker
It is an understandable response to very real pain. But it also radically curtails personal freedom. At its essence, it criminalizes the decision of who to talk to, who to treat respectfully, who to welcome into the home, who to consider a fellow believer in the most important matters, who to greet within the fold of those deemed pure.
00:08:52
Speaker
The human toll of government intrusion into such affairs is self-evident. Of course, the toll may fall heaviest of all on the freedom of religion. Mr. Hake's case is the first time an entire congregation has ever been charged with a crime in Belgium.
00:09:12
Speaker
Jehovah's Witnesses met such consequences for teaching that God wants believers to withdraw from dissenters.
Shunning in Religious Contexts
00:09:20
Speaker
Jehovah's Witnesses may take this attitude to an unhealthy extreme, but Massimo Introvigny notes that it is hardly unique.
00:09:29
Speaker
Religions regularly draw lines between who is in and who is out in order to maintain their coherence and instill a spirit of collective discipline. Famously, the early modern philosopher Baruch Spinoza was shunned by Amsterdam's Jews to the degree that the observant were not to come within four cubits of him.
00:09:51
Speaker
Some ultra-orthodox Jewish communities retain shunning to this day. Introvine also canvases a Christian history of capital punishment and social discrimination against apostates. None of this comes without a cost, one with which Mr. Introvine is personally familiar.
00:10:12
Speaker
I am a Roman Catholic and one who is divorced and remarried. Some of my friends are conservative Catholics, and no matter what the Popes might have said about merciful inclusion, have decided to cease any association with me." Despite this, he believes liberty in structuring personal relationships and communal commitments to be important.
Personal Reflections on Shunning
00:10:38
Speaker
The end of these friendships was certainly painful, yet I respected their free decision not to associate with me any longer, and certainly did not ask a court of law to compel them to continue our friendship. Nor did I sue the conservative theologians who support this behavior asking for damages or fines. This was not generosity, it was simply common sense. Common sense, that is, born of a healthy appreciation for freedom.
00:11:08
Speaker
Life together in human society is fraught with controversies. One of the tragedies of our worldly existence is that we sometimes disagree on even the most intimate matters, and these sad occasions can lead to alienation.
00:11:24
Speaker
Nearly nothing is more painful. From my own Catholic perspective, Jehovah's Witnesses introduces far more severe ruptures than God wills for his children. Nevertheless, their freedom to disfellowship and my right to withhold fellowship with them are one and the same. The Ghent Tribunal aired by swallowing the liberty of each in attempting to provide harmony for all.
Conclusion and Further Readings
00:12:02
Speaker
That concludes our episode on The Right to Shun, Ghent's Misguided Jehovah's Witness Decision by Matthew P. Cavanaugh. You can find the full article, complete with citations and links, on canopyforum.org. Canopy Forum and the Interactions podcast are distributed by the Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University, produced by Anna Knudsen, and I am your narrator, Janet Metzger.
00:12:32
Speaker
Please follow Canopy Forum on Twitter or Facebook, and subscribe to Interactions on your favorite podcast platform. Thank you for listening.