"Two years from now, all white-collar jobs may be gone." — Dario Amodei (via Keith Teare)



Keith Teare [https://www.linkedin.com/in/keithteare/] leads this week's tech roundup with a video he made on Google's Veo: one glass half-full of water, another half-full of spiders. It's a metaphor for the AI moment. The water represents the tools released in the past two weeks—Anthropic's Claude 4.6, OpenAI's CodeX 5.3—which Keith calls "beyond belief." The spiders represent the fear, which he acknowledges is not irrational. But maybe spiders are the wrong metaphor. Maybe we're the frogs being slowly boiled, not noticing the temperature rise until it's too late.

The trigger was Matt Schumer's viral essay "Something Big is Happening [https://twitter.com/mattshumer_]," which got 50 million views by telling engineers to become AI experts immediately or become irrelevant. Keith tested the thesis: he built venturebets.io [https://venturebets.io], a prediction market, in a single day. He automated That Was The Week [https://thatwastheweek.com] so completely that his weekly workflow dropped from six hours to under one. But then Dario Amodei and Satya Nadella both said the quiet part loud: in two years, there may be no white-collar jobs left. Keith's response? The glass doesn't contain jobs—it contains the future of life. And he'd rather have time to make videos of spiders crawling out of glasses than spend six hours curating links. The rest of us may not have the luxury of choosing.

 

About the Guest



Keith Teare [https://www.linkedin.com/in/keithteare/] is a serial entrepreneur and investor, founder of SignalRank [https://signalrank.com], and author of the newsletter That Was The Week [https://thatwastheweek.com]. He co-hosts the weekly tech roundup on Keen On America.

References



Essays discussed:



●      Matt Schumer's "Something Big is Happening" went viral with 50 million views, arguing that engineers must become AI experts immediately or face obsolescence.

●      Noah Smith [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah_Smith_(writer)] published two essays: "The Fall of the Nerds" and "You Are No Longer the Smartest Type of Thing on Earth," arguing that humanity's destiny is now mostly out of our own hands.

●      Josh Tyrangiel wrote "America Isn't Ready for What AI Will Do to Jobs" in The Atlantic [https://www.theatlantic.com].

●      The Financial Times [https://www.ft.com] published "Anthropic's Breakout Moment" on the company's enterprise momentum.

Tools and companies mentioned:



●      Claude 4.6 [https://www.anthropic.com] from Anthropic and CodeX 5.3 [https://openai.com] from OpenAI represent a "step change" in agentic AI—you give tasks, not prompts, and sub-agents complete them autonomously.

●      Google Veo [https://deepmind.google/technologies/veo/] is Google's video generation tool, which Keith used to create the glass-half-full-of-spiders metaphor.

●      Polymarket [https://polymarket.com] and Kalshi [https://kalshi.com] are prediction markets that Keith's new venturebets.io aims to match in quality.

People mentioned:



●      Dario Amodei [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dario_Amodei], CEO of Anthropic, predicted that white-collar jobs may be gone in two years.

●      Satya Nadella [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satya_Nadella], CEO of Microsoft, echoed Amodei's prediction about the end of white-collar work.

About Keen On America



Nobody asks more awkward questions than the Anglo-American writer and filmmaker Andrew Keen. In Ke

Two Years Till We're Cooked: The Death of White Collar Work and Other Human Things

"She's a ten to me and that's the part that matters." — Paul Eastwick



If it's Valentine's Day, we must be talking about love. Paul Eastwick [https://psychology.ucdavis.edu/people/eastwick] studies attraction and relationships at UC Davis, and his new book Bonded by Evolution [https://www.amazon.com/Bonded-Evolution-Science-Love-Connection/dp/1541704797] takes aim at the "old science" that treated romance like a competitive market where everyone gets assigned a number. The incels, of course, ran with that research to compound their paranoia about the other sex. Eastwick says they got it wrong—and so, with the exception of Paul Eastwick, did most academics.

When two people look at the same photograph and make a hot-or-not judgment, Eastwick explains, they only agree about 65% of the time. After they've known the person for months, agreement drops to barely better than a coin flip. So there isn't any universal hierarchy of desirability. What's real is that some people will think you're an 8 and others will think you're a 3—and that quirky disagreement explains most of what happens in the science of attraction. The problem is that dating apps make everything feel like they're in a market, thereby filtering out the "slow burn" people who need time to grow on you. Eastwick's advice, therefore, is forget swiping, reboot your social networks, throw candle lit dinner parties where nobody knows each other. It's more democratic, it takes longer, and it actually works. Happy V day everyone.



About the Guest



Paul Eastwick [https://psychology.ucdavis.edu/people/eastwick] is Professor of Psychology at UC Davis, where he studies attraction and close relationships. He is the author of Bonded by Evolution: The New Science of Love and Connection [https://www.amazon.com/Bonded-Evolution-Science-Love-Connection/dp/1541704797] (2026) and co-host of the podcast Love Factually [https://www.lovefactuallypodcast.com/] with Eli Finkel.

References



Concepts discussed:



●      The mating market hypothesis [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mating_market] treats attraction like an economic exchange where people are assigned desirability values and seek partners at their "level"—an idea Eastwick argues is far more limited than academics have assumed.

●      Limerence [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limerence] is the academic term for the intense, obsessive early stage of romantic attraction—what we might call infatuation or passion.

●      The Dunbar number [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number] (~150) represents the cognitive limit on stable social relationships—roughly the size of hunter-gatherer groups where our mating psychology evolved.

●      Pair bonding [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_bond] emerged in human evolution about two million years ago as brain size increased and children required longer periods of intensive parental investment.

●      Attachment theory [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attachment_theory] describes the deep bonds that form when we trust someone to have our back, celebrate our successes, and support us through difficulty.

Evolution and mating:



●      Human males became smaller relative to females and lost their sharp canines as women selected for men who were safe around babies—"the evolved male is the good caregiver and good dad."

●      Unlike gorillas with their harem-style mating, humans shifted toward pair bonding because helpless infants with expanding brains needed investment from both parents.

●      Polyamory research [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyamory] shows that people can form genuine attachment bonds with multiple partne

What is Love?  Paul Eastwick on the New Science of Attraction 

"How can you not be a populist in this day and age?" — Hélène Landemore



In February 2020, The New Yorker profiled a Yale professor making the case for citizen rule. Six years later, that political scientist, Hélène Landemore, has a new book entitled Politics Without Politicians arguing that politics should be "an amateur sport instead of an expert's job" and that randomly selected citizen assemblies should replace representative democracy. Landemore calls it "jury duty on steroids."

Landemore draws on her experience observing France's Citizens' Conventions on both climate and end-of-life issues to now direct Connecticut's first state-level citizen assembly. We discuss why the Greeks used lotteries instead of elections, what G.K. Chesterton meant by imagining democracy as a "jolly hostess," and why she has sympathy for the anti-Federalists who lost the argument about the best form of American government to Madison. When I ask if she's comfortable being called a populist, she doesn't flinch: "If the choice is between populist and elitist, I don't know how you can not be a populist." From the Damon Wells'58 Professor of Political Science at Yale, this might sound a tad suicidal. At least professionally. But Landemore's jolly argument for a politics without politicians is the type of message that will win elections in our populist age.

 

About the Guest



Hélène Landemore [https://politicalscience.yale.edu/people/helene-landemore] is the Damon Wells'58 Professor of Political Science at Yale University. She is the author of Politics Without Politicians: The Case for Citizen Rule [https://www.amazon.com/Politics-Without-Politicians-Citizen-Rule/dp/0691254095] (2026) and Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century [https://www.amazon.com/Open-Democracy-Reinventing-Popular-Twenty-First/dp/0691181993] (2020).

References



Thinkers discussed:



●      G.K. Chesterton [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton] was the British essayist who defined democracy as an "attempt, like that of a jolly hostess, to bring the shy people out"—a vision Landemore finds more inspiring than technical definitions about elite selection.

●      James Madison [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Madison] and the Federalists designed a republic meant to filter popular passions through elected representatives; Landemore has sympathy for their anti-Federalist opponents who wanted legislatures that looked like "a mini-portrait of the people."

●      Alexis de Tocqueville [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexis_de_Tocqueville] warned about the dangers of trusting ordinary people—a caution Landemore pushes back against, arguing that voters respond to the limited choices they're given.

●      Max Weber [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber] wrote "Politics as a Vocation" (1919), arguing that politics requires a special calling; Landemore questions whether it should be a profession at all.

●      Jean-Jacques Rousseau [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Jacques_Rousseau] and his concept of the general will has been blamed for totalitarian impulses; Landemore rejects the comparison, insisting her vision preserves liberal constitutional frameworks.

●      Joseph Schumpeter [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Schumpeter] defined democracy as "a method for elite selection"—precisely the technocratic framing Landemore wants to overturn.

Citizen assembly experiments mentioned:



●      The Irish Citizens' Assembly [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens%27_Assembly_(Ireland)] on abortion (2016-2017) is often cited as proof that randomly selected citizens can deliberate on divisive issues and rea

Politics Without Politicians: Hélène Landemore's Case for Citizen Rule

"I will say that QAnon was right and I was wrong." — Pepper Culpepper



From Bannon and Trump to Summers, Gates, Blavatnik and Chomsky, the Epstein scandal has revealed elites of all ideological stripes behaving shamefully together. The Oxford political scientist Pepper Culpepper argues this is exactly the kind of corporate scandal that can save democracy—not despite its ugliness, but because of it. His new co-authored book, Billionaire Backlash, shows how scandals activate "latent opinion," bringing long-simmering public concerns to the surface and triggering society-wide demand for regulation. We discuss why Cambridge Analytica led to California privacy law, how Samsung's bribery scandal sparked Korea's Candlelight Protests, and why China's authoritarian approach to corporate malfeasance actually undermines trust.

Culpepper, himself the Blavatnik Professor of Government at Oxford's Blavatnik School, acknowledges an uncomfortable truth. "I would say that QAnon was right," he admits, "and I was wrong." The specifics might have been fantasy, but the underlying suspicion about elite corruption was justified. And policy entrepreneurs—obsessive individuals who channel public outrage into actual legislation—matter more than we think. For Culpepper, billionaire backlash isn't a threat to democracy—it might actually be what saves it.

 

About the Guest



Pepper Culpepper [https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/people/pepper-culpepper] is Vice Dean of the Blavatnik School of Government [https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/] at the University of Oxford. He is the co-author, with Taeku Lee of Harvard, of Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How It Could Save Democracy [https://www.amazon.com/Billionaire-Backlash-Corporate-Scandal-Democracy/dp/0691249016] (2026).

References



Scandals discussed:



●      The Epstein scandal [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein] revealed that elites across politics, finance, and academia were connected to Jeffrey Epstein's network of abuse—vindicating populist suspicions that "the system is broken."

●      Cambridge Analytica [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Analytica_data_scandal] (2018) exposed how Facebook leaked data on 90 million users, leading to the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act in the EU, and California's privacy regulations.

●      The Samsung bribery scandal [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016%E2%80%932017_South_Korean_protests] in South Korea led to the Candlelight Protests and President Park Geun-hye's resignation, demonstrating how corporate scandals can strengthen civil society.

●      The 2008 Chinese milk scandal [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Chinese_milk_scandal] killed six infants due to melamine contamination; the government's cover-up during the Beijing Olympics destroyed public trust in domestic food safety.

●      Volkswagen's Dieselgate scandal [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal] showed how companies cheat on regulations, bringing latent concerns about corporate behavior to the surface.

Policy entrepreneurs mentioned:



●      Carl Levin [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Levin] was a US Senator from Michigan who shepherded the Goldman Sachs hearings and contributed to the Dodd-Frank Act.

●      Margrethe Vestager [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margrethe_Vestager] served as EU Competition Commissioner and pushed for the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act.

●      Max Schrems [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Schrems] is an Austrian privacy activist who, as a student, discovered Facebook retained his deleted messages and eventually brought down the US-

Can Billionaire Backlash Save Democracy? Pepper Culpepper on our Age of Corporate Scandal

"You either need to call it fascism or you need to invent a new word with more or less the same meaning." — Jonathan Rauch

Jonathan Rauch's viral Atlantic essay [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/01/america-fascism-trump-maga-ice/685751/] has reignited the debate over what to call the Trump administration. Having previously settled on "semi-fascist," Rauch now argues that Trump ticks all 18 boxes on his checklist of fascist characteristics — from the glorification of violence and territorial ambitions to Carl Schmitt's philosophy of "enemies, not adversaries." We spar over whether the term obscures more than it reveals: Is this really fascism, or just authoritarianism with American characteristics? The conversation sharpens around Minneapolis, where citizens were shot face down, and the government initially denied it happened. You don't do that to win votes, Rauch argues — you do it because you believe that's how the social contract should work. He predicts Trump will fail to turn America into a fascist country but warns that institutions like the newly expanded ICE will outlast this administration.

 

About the Guest

Jonathan Rauch [https://www.brookings.edu/people/jonathan-rauch/] is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a contributing writer for The Atlantic. He is the author of nine books, including The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth [https://www.amazon.com/Constitution-Knowledge-Jonathan-Rauch/dp/0815738862] (2021), Cross Purposes: Christianity's Broken Bargain with Democracy (2025), and Kindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought (1993). He received the 2005 National Magazine Award.

References



Thinkers discussed:



·      Carl Schmitt [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Schmitt] was a Nazi political theorist whose "friend-enemy distinction" argued that politics is fundamentally about identifying and crushing enemies, not managing disagreements with adversaries.

·      George Orwell [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Orwell] wrote in his 1946 essay "Politics and the English Language" that "the word 'fascism' has now no meaning except insofar as it signifies something not desirable."

·      Hannah Arendt [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Arendt] was a German-American political theorist and refugee from Nazi Germany whose book The Origins of Totalitarianism examined both Nazism and Stalinism, preferring "totalitarianism" to "fascism" as the more encompassing term.

Historical figures:



·      Benito Mussolini [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini] invented the term "fascism" (from the Latin fasces, a bundle of rods symbolizing collective strength) and ruled Italy as dictator from 1922 to 1943.

·      Francisco Franco [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Franco] ruled Spain from 1939 to 1975. Whether he was truly a fascist or merely an authoritarian remains debated; he never got along well with Hitler and outlasted the fascist era by three decades.

·      Viktor Orbán [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Orb%C3%A1n] is the prime minister of Hungary whose systematic capture of media, courts, and civil society has become known as the "Orbán playbook" — a template Rauch argues the Trump administration is following.

Contemporary figures mentioned:



·      Stephen Miller [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Miller_(political_advisor)] is a senior advisor to Trump who declared that "force is the iron law of the world" and told progressives "you are nothing" at a memorial service where the widow of the deceased had just offered Christian forgiveness to an assassin.

· 

Yes, It's Fascism: Jon Rauch on Trump and the F Word

"The black market exists only because we decided that this form of trade should be illegal." — Scott Eden

In October 2019, tech executive Tushar Atre was abducted from his oceanfront home in Santa Cruz and found murdered on his own property in the redwoods — shot execution-style, hands bound. He had spent barely three years in the cannabis business. Scott Eden's new book traces how a charismatic Silicon Valley entrepreneur, seeking to "disrupt" the newly legal weed industry, found himself entangled with an array of colorful and dangerous characters — hippie do-gooders, black-market operators, and stone-cold killers. We discuss the permeable divide between legal and illegal cannabis, why the industry has been an economic disaster for most founders, and whether America's half-pregnant approach to legalization created the conditions for Tushar's death. A California story about ambition, love, and the darker edges of the American dream.

About the Guest

Scott Eden [https://www.scotteden.net/] is an award-winning investigative journalist whose work has appeared in ESPN The Magazine, GQ, Wired, Inc., and The Atavist. His story "The Prosecution of Thabo Sefolosha" won a 2017 New York Press Club Award and a National Association of Black Journalists award for investigative reporting. He is the author of Touchdown Jesus (Simon & Schuster, 2005) and the new A Killing in Cannabis [https://www.amazon.com/Killing-Cannabis-author/dp/1954118627].

References:



People discussed:

 * Tushar Atre [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tushar_Atre] — tech executive and cannabis entrepreneur; murdered October 1, 2019
 * Rachael Lynch — cannabis grower from the Emerald Triangle; Atre's business partner and lover
 * Ken Kesey [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Kesey] — author of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest; Merry Pranksters; La Honda cabin in the Santa Cruz Mountains
 * Sean Parker [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Parker] — Napster founder, early Facebook investor; bankrolled Proposition 64
 * Travis Kalanick [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travis_Kalanick] — Uber founder; comparison to Atre's brash, edge-seeking style
 * Tony Hsieh [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Hsieh] — Zappos founder; tragic death; Silicon Valley hipster executive archetype

Places:

 * Pleasure Point, Santa Cruz [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleasure_Point,_California] — oceanfront neighborhood; famous surf break; Atre's home
 * Emerald Triangle [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerald_Triangle] — Humboldt, Mendocino, Trinity counties; America's cannabis heartland

Legal and historical:

 * Proposition 64 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_California_Proposition_64] (2016) — California ballot initiative legalizing recreational cannabis
 * Proposition 215 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_California_Proposition_215] (1996) — earlier medical marijuana law; the "215 era"

About Keen On America

Nobody asks more awkward questions than the Anglo-American writer and filmmaker Andrew Keen. In Keen On America, Andrew brings his pointed Transatlantic wit to making sense of the United States—hosting daily interviews about the history and future of this now venerable Republic. With nearly 2,800 episodes since the show launched on TechCrunch in 2010, Keen On America is the most prolific intellectual interview show in the history of podcasting.


Website [https://keenon.tv/]

Substack [https://keenon.substack.com/]

YouTu [https://youtube.com/@KeenOnShow]

Californian True Crime: A Killing in Cannabis

"We all love Thomas Paine. We just wish we liked him." — Jonathan Turley

Jonathan Turley's new book asks a deceptively simple question: why did the American Revolution become the longest-running successful democracy while the French Revolution devoured itself? The answer, he argues, lies in Madison's "auxiliary precautions" — constitutional safeguards designed not to eliminate rage but to channel it. Turley draws a direct line from Robespierre to today's calls to pack the Supreme Court and abolish the Senate, warning that removing those precautions invites the same mobocracy that sent the Jacobins to the guillotine. But the real provocation comes in the book's second half: with AI and robotics threatening mass unemployment, America may soon face a "kept population" — citizens subsidized by the state who lose their vital relationship to productivity and self-governance. We discuss Thomas Paine (brilliant about humanity, clueless about humans), why rage itself isn't the enemy, and whether the republic built to handle the 18th century can survive the 21st.

About the Guest

Jonathan Turley [https://jonathanturley.org/] is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University Law School. A legal analyst for CBS, NBC, BBC, and Fox News over three decades, he is the author of The Indispensable Right (a bestseller) and the new Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution [https://www.amazon.com/Rage-Republic-Unfinished-American-Revolution/dp/1668205025].

Chapters:

00:01:14 The uniqueness of the American Revolution
Two revolutions, two outcomes; Thomas Paine and James Madison as the twin geniuses

00:03:53 Paine vs. Madison on democracy
Paine wanted direct democracy; it nearly got him guillotined in France

00:05:54 Robespierre's transformation
The ACLU lawyer who came to believe "terror is virtue"

00:09:01 Thomas Paine: the penman of the revolution
From complete failure to revolutionary genius in two years

00:11:46 Slavery and the revolution's contradictions
Why people preferred Jefferson to Paine

00:15:43 Franklin's greatest achievement
Seeing something in "that heap of human wreckage"

00:18:07 What was unique about American rage
Not the rage itself, but the system designed to handle it

00:25:08 The "New Jacobins"
Calls to pack the Supreme Court and abolish the Senate

00:26:40 Rage on both sides
"Your rage is righteous, their rage is dangerous"

00:30:47 AI and the "kept population"
Mass unemployment and the citizen's relationship to the state

00:39:26 "Gynan" jobs
Homocentric industries like psychiatry and education that AI can't replace

00:45:00 Why the American Republic is still the best model
Decentralization over EU-style centralization

References



Figures discussed:

 * Thomas Paine [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Paine] — arrived in America "barely alive," became the penman of the revolution in two years
 * James Madison [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Madison] — designed the "auxiliary precautions" that prevented American democracy from devouring itself
 * Benjamin Franklin [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin] — paid for Paine's passage to America, saw genius in "that heap of human wreckage"
 * Maximilien Robespierre [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximilien_Robespierre] — began as an advocate for due process, ended declaring "terror is virtue"
 * Jean-Paul Marat [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Paul_Marat] — radical journalist, killed by Corday in his bathtub (he bathed constantly due to a skin disease)
 * Charlott [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Corday]

Rage in the American Republic

"It may not be Mister Right YouTube, but it is Mister Right Now." — Erika Dilday

On Super Bowl Sunday — with America celebrating its 250th anniversary — Erika Dilday joins to discuss the power of documentary film to cut through algorithmic noise and show us who we really are. As executive producer of POV, the longest-running documentary program on American television (now entering its 39th season), Dilday has spent her career championing first-person storytelling that platforms won't surface. She's also co-directing an upcoming series with Ken Burns, Emancipation to Exodus, exploring the period from the Civil War to the Great Migration. We discuss why algorithms limit discovery, whether AI can replicate human nuance, and what she learned from screening films at San Quentin.

About the Guest

Erika Dilday [https://www.linkedin.com/in/erika-dilday-39959010/] is the Executive Producer of POV [https://www.pbs.org/pov/], America's longest-running documentary series, now in its 39th season on PBS. She is co-directing Emancipation to Exodus [https://kenburns.com/films/emancipation-to-exodus/] with Ken Burns, a documentary series about the period from the end of the Civil War to the Great Migration, scheduled for PBS in 2027. Her father was the first Black television station manager in the United States.

Chapters:

00:00:01 Opening
Super Bowl Sunday, America's 250th, and Erika's prediction ("all Patriots all the way")

00:02:28 Emancipation to Exodus
Her collaboration with Ken Burns on the period from Civil War to Great Migration (PBS, 2027)

00:05:09 Her father's legacy
The first Black TV station manager in the United States; "Those who want change don't have the luxury of being comfortable"

00:06:23 Documentary as truth and art
What distinguishes film from news; Hoop Dreams and the power of immersive storytelling

00:08:21 POV's mission
39 seasons, Tongues Untied, and stories that wouldn't be told elsewhere

00:11:27 PBS and the culture wars
Pressures on public broadcasting, the need for alternative distribution

00:15:47 YouTube: Mister Right Now
Not the ideal platform, but the only one for democratic distribution

00:17:38 San Quentin Film Festival
Incarcerated audiences engaging deeply with documentary

00:20:06 Media consolidation
Time Warner, Netflix, Paramount; indie platforms like Mubi and Ovid

00:21:49 Algorithms and discovery
Platforms suggest what they think you want, not what might stretch your thinking

00:24:47 AI vs. human nuance
"It can be imitated, but it's not going to be replicated"

00:27:26 Oscar picks
The Perfect Neighbor (2025) (Netflix) and Cutting Through Rocks (2025) (the sleeper)

References:

 * POV [https://www.pbs.org/pov/]
 * Hoop Dreams [https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110057/] (1994) — documentary about two Chicago high school students dreaming of NBA careers
 * Tongues Untied [https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103099/] (1989) — Marlon Riggs' documentary on Black gay identity in America (POV Season 4)
 * Salesman [https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064921/] (1968) — Maysles Brothers documentary following door-to-door Bible salesmen
 * The Perfect Neighbor (2025) [https://www.imdb.com/title/tt34962891/] — Geeta Gandbhir's documentary about a killing in Florida, told through body cam footage (Netflix)
 * Cutting Through Rocks (2025) [https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10196414/] — Sara Khaki and Mohammad Reza Eyni's documentary about a female elected official and motorcycle rider in Iran
 * San Quentin Film Festival [https://www.sanquentinfilmfestival.com/] — the first film festival ever held inside a U.S. prison, celebrating incarcerated and formerly inc

Documenting America: How to See Beyond the Algorithm

"I didn't use my own software this week because the OpenAI agents were better. And that's me retiring my own software." — Keith Teare

Something broke this week. Both Anthropic and OpenAI launched multi-agent systems—"agent swarms"—that don't just assist with tasks but replace custom-built software entirely. The market noticed: Adobe, Salesforce, Workday, and other legacy SaaS companies saw their stocks collapse in what some are calling a trillion-dollar selloff. Keith Teare joins Andrew Keen on Super Bowl weekend to unpack what may be the most consequential week in AI since ChatGPT launched.

The conversation ranges from the Anthropic-OpenAI advertising spat (Dario Amodei's Super Bowl ad vs. Sam Altman's "online tantrum") to the deeper structural shifts: Microsoft and Amazon becoming utilities, Google betting $185 billion on an AI-first pivot, and Elon Musk merging SpaceX with xAI to put data centers in space. Along the way, Teare and Keen debate whether the AI race is a myth or a wacky race, whether venture capital is in crisis, and what happens to human labor when agents do the work.


About the Guest

Keith Teare [https://www.linkedin.com/in/kteare/] is a British-American entrepreneur, investor, and technology analyst. He co-founded RealNames Corporation, a pioneering internet company, and later served as Executive Chairman of TechCrunch. He is the founder of That Was The Week [https://www.thatwastheweek.com/] and SignalRank [https://signalrank.com/], and publishes a widely-read weekly newsletter on technology, venture capital, and the business of innovation. He brings four decades of experience in Silicon Valley to his analysis of the AI revolution.



Chapters:
00:00 Super Bowl and the Anthropic ad
The spat between Dario Amodei and Sam Altman

01:09 "Fundamentally dishonest"
 Keith's take on the ad war and who's really Dick Dastardly

05:47 Anthropic's breakout week
 Claude Opus 4.6 and the agent swarm launch

06:48 OpenAI Codex
 Multiple agents collaborating on tasks in 10-15 minutes

07:42 "It replaces software"
 Keith retires his own custom-built tools

08:16 The trillion-dollar selloff
 Adobe, Salesforce, Workday, PayPal collapse

11:02 Infrastructure vs. innovation
 Microsoft and Amazon become "utilities"

11:45 Google's $185 billion bet
 Pivoting from hybrid to AI-first

13:15 The SpaceX/xAI merger
 Musk's plan for space-based data centers

15:18 The AI wacky race
 Kimi, OpenAI, Anthropic leapfrog Google

17:03 Does AI make us smarter?
 Leverage tools, not intelligence

18:53 AI growing up, CEOs not
 The adolescence of the industry

21:06 US job openings hit five-year low
 The coming labor crisis

22:44 The VC crisis
 Five funds sucking the air out of the room

25:04 Palantir and Anduril
 The winners in defense AI

25:42 Facebook as laggard
 Huge revenues, no AI momentum

26:41 The Washington Post crisis
 "Boogeyman journalism" and partisan media

29:23 Ads in AI
 Paid links vs. enshittification

31:26 Spotify's innovation
 Physical book + audiobook bundle

32:32 Startup of the week
 Cursor for CRM, $20M from Sequoia

33:45 Om Malik on the end of software distribution
 From CDs to app stores to self-made

35:41 Super Bowl prediction
 Seattle vs. New England

36:02 Closing
 "That really was the week in tech"



Links & References

Mentioned in this episode:

That Was The Week newsletter by Keith Teare [https://www.thatwastheweek.com/]

Anthropic's Super Bowl ad and ad-free pledge (CNBC) [https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/04/anthropic-no-ads-claude-chatbot-openai-chatgpt.html]

Whoosh! That Really Was a Week in Tech: Winner-Take-All AI and the $1 Trillion Selloff

What kind of leadership can hold a fractured democracy together?

About the Guest

Stephen Schlesinger [https://www.stephenschlesinger.com/]is an American historian, author, and foreign policy analyst. The son of Arthur Schlesinger Jr.—Pulitzer Prize–winning historian and special assistant to President John F. Kennedy—and grandson of Arthur Schlesinger Sr., he grew up at the centre of one of America's most distinguished intellectual families. Schlesinger is the author of Act of Creation: The Founding of the United Nations [https://www.stephenschlesinger.com/act-of-creation/], and has written widely on American foreign policy and international institutions. He knew both John and Robert Kennedy personally, and brings a rare insider perspective to the history of American liberalism.

About This Episode

"He went around the table asking us, 'Do you still believe in God?' — this was 1967, he was already being considered for the presidency. Why would a man of this intensity and ambition be talking about these issues?" - Stephen Schlesinger [https://www.stephenschlesinger.com/]

After two days exploring the surveillance state and the ethics of unmasking—with Andrew Guthrie Ferguson on how your data will be used against you and Christopher Mathias on the fight to expose the radical right—Andrew Keen steps back to ask a larger question: What kind of leadership can hold a fractured democracy together?

Stephen Schlesinger joins the show from the Upper West Side of New York to offer a historian's perspective—and a personal one. From his father's role in Camelot to his own memories of playing touch football with Bobby Kennedy at Hickory Hill, Schlesinger reflects on what made the Kennedy brothers effective leaders in a divided country, and what lessons their example holds for progressives today. The conversation moves from the founding of the republic (one-third pro-British) through the Civil War to the present fracture, and asks whether elections remain democracy's "great solver"—or whether something has fundamentally changed.

Chapters:

00:00 Introduction
 On the road in New York, beside Columbia University

01:10 What Has Happened to America?
 Schlesinger’s 250-year view of national fracture

03:40 The One-Third Fracture
 Why a leader with minority support cannot impose ideology on 330 million

05:15 Elections as the Great Solver
 Except for the Civil War, the ballot box has resolved every American crisis

07:30 An Intellectual Aristocracy
 Harvard, the Schlesinger legacy, and the view from inside the American elite

10:45 The Romance of Camelot
 Meeting JFK, the magnetism of youth, and the television presidency

14:20 Bobby’s Vulnerability
 The dinner where RFK asked, “Do you still believe in God?”

17:45 Touch Football at Hickory Hill
 Bobby’s toughness and the bullet pass Schlesinger had to catch

20:30 Jackie vs. Hickory Hill
 Two styles of Kennedy parenting

22:15 Composed Jack, Emotional Bobby
 Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s perspective on the two brothers

24:40 The Assassinations
 The White House, Lyndon Johnson’s motorcade, and the bar exam Schlesinger failed

28:15 Could Bobby Have Won?
 Humphrey, the nomination, and what might have been

30:30 The Kennedys and Internationalism
 From Joe Kennedy’s isolationism to JFK’s UN vision and RFK during the Cuban Missile Crisis

34:00 Chris Matthews and the Bobby Kennedy Cenentary
Lessons for Today

36:30 The Perpetual Civic Duty

Why each generation must defend constitutional freedoms anew

38:45 Closing

Advice to grandchildren and the enduring fight for democracy

Links & References

Mentioned in this episode:

Catching More Than Passes From Bobby: Stephen Schlesinger on what RFK Can Still Teach America

The daily show about the big ideas, new technologies, books and people changing the world. Hosted by Andrew Keen.