Speaker
But he's well he's got SFRs on file for 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2006. And he told me yesterday, Brooks, the taxpayer, that he's willing to sign off on, like they used to have a form 4059 that if you signed it, it could be considered You could say, what what's that? Considered agreed. Agreed, yes. But then I guess Congress changed the law and said, because an SFR is not purported to meet the beard test, meaning a return on a valid return on the forms signed under penalties and perjury, you know, attacks computed and reasonable compliance with the law. I guess it meets three out of the four because it's, i't I don't know, but