Become a Creator today!Start creating today - Share your story with the world!
Start for free
00:00:00
00:00:01
Reg Talks – The Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR) updates
23 Plays4 years ago
Listen to our experts discuss the latest on CSDR and other updates in the regulatory space in this new series launched by HSBC Securities Services.
For more information on anything that you have heard in this podcast, please visit grp.hsbc/csdr
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Recommended
Transcript
Introduction to HSBC Podcasts
00:00:00
Speaker
This is HSBC Global Viewpoint, your window into the thinking, trends and issues shaping global banking and markets.
00:00:09
Speaker
Join us as we hear from industry leaders and HSBC experts on the latest insights and opportunities for your business.
00:00:18
Speaker
A heads up to our listeners that this episode has been recorded remotely, therefore the sound quality may vary.
00:00:24
Speaker
Thank you for listening.
Security Services Reg Talks Launch
00:00:30
Speaker
Welcome to our first edition of our Security Services Reg Talks podcast.
00:00:34
Speaker
We will be exploring the latest trends and updates in the regulatory space, shining a critical light on topics and their impact on the security services world.
00:00:43
Speaker
Joining me today are Paul Ellis, Global Head of Product Regulation and Tax, and Paul Babis, Senior Product Manager, Global Middle Office Product at its Security Services, HSBC, and
00:00:54
Speaker
We will discuss the application of the settlement discipline regime of the European Union's Central Securities Depository Regulation, in short, CSDR.
00:01:03
Speaker
I hand
Understanding CSDR Regulations
00:01:04
Speaker
over now to Paul Ellis, who will give a quick recap on the scope of CSDR.
00:01:08
Speaker
Paul?
00:01:09
Speaker
Okay, thanks, Gabriella.
00:01:10
Speaker
Yeah, the scope of CSDR is broad, and it generally relates to all securities which settle in a European settlement system.
00:01:20
Speaker
So when we talk about settlement discipline, we really boil that down to three key things.
00:01:25
Speaker
There are measures within the regulation to prevent settlement failures.
00:01:29
Speaker
There are penalties or fines for the late settlement of those securities.
00:01:33
Speaker
And the ultimate sanction
00:01:35
Speaker
could be mandatory buy-ins for failures of those security settlements.
00:01:40
Speaker
First and foremost,
CSDR Compliance Deadline Changes
00:01:41
Speaker
I think it's probably an appropriate time to talk about timing because this regulation, the deadline on it, has changed.
00:01:48
Speaker
It was originally due to come into force in terms of settlement discipline rules in September, but some of those timings have changed.
00:01:55
Speaker
And I want to bring...
00:01:56
Speaker
Paul in on this because Paul Baybutt has been very active within the industry and engaging with regulators on timing and all the implications of settlement
UK's Post-Brexit Settlement Rules
00:02:06
Speaker
discipline.
00:02:06
Speaker
So Paul, where do you think we now stand in terms of the latest compliance deadlines advised by regulators, please?
00:02:12
Speaker
Hi Paul, thanks for giving me the opportunity to talk about this interesting subject.
00:02:17
Speaker
Where are we today?
00:02:18
Speaker
Officially had the deadline put back to February 2021.
00:02:22
Speaker
That was approved by European Parliament.
00:02:26
Speaker
But at the same time as that approval was going through, the European Commission requested ESMA to propose a further 12-month delay.
00:02:35
Speaker
And the first delay was down to the readiness of the industry to have the technology in place.
00:02:40
Speaker
This subsequent delay is purely down to the impact of COVID-19 and the fact that COVID-19 has forced firms to reconsider some of their priorities.
00:02:51
Speaker
In response to that, ESMA prepared an RTS, a Regulatory Technical Standard,
00:02:56
Speaker
which is proposed that there is a 12-month delay to February 2022.
00:03:01
Speaker
And I guess there is obviously another kind of key question around scope, because as we know, the UK will leave the European Union on the 1st of January.
00:03:08
Speaker
And they recently indicated that they were not going to proceed with the settlement discipline rules.
00:03:14
Speaker
First of all, is that correct?
00:03:18
Speaker
And if so, why is that, in your view?
00:03:21
Speaker
It is correct.
00:03:22
Speaker
The UK will not apply the EU settlement discipline rules.
00:03:27
Speaker
And strangely, one of my buddies in the industry told me that this would happen about 12 months ago, and we all said he was mad.
00:03:36
Speaker
It turns out that he was spot on.
00:03:38
Speaker
And the reason he was spot on was because the delay that had been proposed, the delay to 2021,
00:03:46
Speaker
has effectively pushed out the ability to the UK to adopt the EU settlement discipline regime.
00:03:52
Speaker
The reason that is that the EU withdrawal act, Brexit withdrawal act, that is going through Parliament, which will transfer European law into UK law, only brings in enacted legislation.
00:04:08
Speaker
And because settlement discipline won't get enacted in 2020,
00:04:13
Speaker
it was always going to be outside the scope of the EU withdrawal act.
00:04:17
Speaker
So the UK was never going to bring in the EU settlement discipline rules while it was being proposed for 2021.
00:04:24
Speaker
That doesn't
Impact on UK Firms Trading in EU
00:04:25
Speaker
mean, though, Paul, that it's completely off the table because the UK has left the door open to introduce their own settlement discipline regime and are already in conversation with various industry bodies as to what that settlement discipline
00:04:41
Speaker
regime needs to look like and whether we actually have a significant problem that needs to be addressed, which I think is the first question that they are trying to get answered.
00:04:51
Speaker
Okay, so I guess, yeah, that's sort of how I understood it is that the UK is going to essentially consult with industry, so we shouldn't sort of automatically conclude that settlement discipline won't arrive in the UK because there's still more discussion to be had on that, but the precise form or how it will play out is unclear, I guess, at this point.
00:05:10
Speaker
I get some related question on the UK, right, because sometimes I think, does that sort of remove UK regulated firms from settlement discipline full stop?
00:05:18
Speaker
But if you go back to my point at the start, the scope is actually, the scope is obviously at the security level.
00:05:23
Speaker
So, similarly, any UK manager or indeed any global manager who's investing in securities that are settling on the European settlement system is impacted, regardless of where they are in the
Industry Concerns on Settlement Discipline
00:05:34
Speaker
world.
00:05:34
Speaker
Is that right?
00:05:36
Speaker
That is right.
00:05:37
Speaker
And this announcement has removed UK securities from a settlement discipline, but it hasn't removed UK firms.
00:05:44
Speaker
And strangely, it hasn't also removed the UK CSD.
00:05:48
Speaker
Now, addressing the firms first, if the firm is trading in EU equity or any security that is settling in a EU CSD, it is in scope.
00:05:58
Speaker
And therefore, all the parties in the settlement chain are pulled into scope.
00:06:01
Speaker
That's the scope for penalties, that's the scope for buy-ins, that's the scope for measures to address settlement failure.
00:06:07
Speaker
But also the UK CSD Crest is pulled into scope where they are operating an investor CSD model with the underlying security ultimately hold in an EU CSD.
00:06:18
Speaker
And they will need to replicate the penalty framework in Crest.
00:06:23
Speaker
So although the decision has been made to take the UK equities and UK settled securities that are settled interest out of scope, ultimately we're all as much involved as we were prior to the announcement.
00:06:38
Speaker
I think that's fair in terms of certainly what some of the industry are saying is that I guess some of the settlement discipline provisions solve one problem but actually create others arguably of
Debate on Buy-Ins and Penalties
00:06:51
Speaker
equal significance.
00:06:52
Speaker
So
00:06:53
Speaker
You know, you've been tracking that obviously a lot within the industry and the forums you engage with.
00:06:58
Speaker
I mean, what would you summarize as the key concerns that, if you like, whether I call them unintended, but the sort of consequential concerns that some participants are focusing in on?
00:07:09
Speaker
I think the key concerns, the biggest concern that a large portion of the industry has is the impact on liquidity of the buying regime and possibly also the impact of liquidity of a penalty mechanism.
00:07:22
Speaker
The buying regime will force parties to ensure that they have even got the security or they factor in the cost of that, not having security into their spreads, into how they price transactions.
00:07:36
Speaker
And that can have a negative effect and a negative impact on the overall industry.
00:07:41
Speaker
Likewise, making a buy in itself is going to cause some significant operational impacts
00:07:51
Speaker
on the industry where they're not used to it.
00:07:53
Speaker
But Paul, I think the key thing is the industry is split.
00:07:56
Speaker
You know, because while some people are in favor of overhauling settlement discipline completely and changing what is required for buy-ins, others are in favor of it and believe that it's necessary to ensure that the overall objective of improving settlement in the EU is met.
00:08:12
Speaker
You know, somebody remarked to me the other day that markets like China and Hong Kong already have their own settlement discipline measures, already have
00:08:19
Speaker
buy-ins or transactions are not allowed to fail.
00:08:23
Speaker
And as such, they have much higher settlement rates and are far more efficient.
00:08:27
Speaker
And their argument is, why can't we have the same in Europe?
00:08:31
Speaker
But the flip side is this liquidity impact.
00:08:34
Speaker
And I think the industry has got to a position now whereby it needs to take time to explain to the European Commission really what the impacts on liquidity will be by that buy-in regime.
Fines-Only vs. Buy-In System
00:08:49
Speaker
Also by the fact that there is a lack of buying agents which are required to administer the buying regime and consequently have that debate with the Commission as to whether these are the right measures.
00:09:04
Speaker
Do you think there is a sort of a middle ground there?
00:09:08
Speaker
Because I have heard some folks saying, well, look, the buy-ins for all those reasons you've described, liquidity, spreads, etc.,
00:09:16
Speaker
Maybe another option is what about just focusing more on the penalties and the fines and making it, if that was sort of the key stick to drive better settlement discipline, maybe make the fines regime more onerous.
00:09:34
Speaker
particularly for, if you like, what I call them, repeat offenders, for those who have a track record of failing trades.
00:09:40
Speaker
I mean, is it possible to contemplate, if you like, a fines-only system without buy-ins?
00:09:46
Speaker
Do you think that's a possibility?
00:09:48
Speaker
Is it a possibility to consider that, Paul, there's firms out there arguing at the moment that the fines are potentially more damaging than the buy-ins.
00:09:56
Speaker
Well, I have yet to debate this in detail with those organizations, but
00:10:01
Speaker
One of the biggest concerns is that the main liquidity issue around the buy-ins is in the fixed income markets, particularly in the illiquid fixed income markets, where the brokers will have to factor in the likelihood of the buy-in into the spread.
00:10:17
Speaker
Penalties, however, will be across the entire market, and if the value of the penalty was to be increased,
00:10:24
Speaker
Even one day's failed trade will result in potentially the spreads being widened to address those short periods of settlement that up to now have been accepted as okay.
00:10:36
Speaker
So the impact of shifting the onus onto penalties could actually make the problem wider for all of the industry, as opposed to the buying process, which is potentially limited to the fixed income markets.
Mandatory vs. Optional Buy-Ins
00:10:53
Speaker
That's not to say, Paul, that the...
00:10:56
Speaker
Equity markets will not also be impacted by buy-ins, but the main issue and the main impact is in that liquid fixed income space.
00:11:07
Speaker
Yeah, but I guess one way or another, if you're going to have a sort of a sanctions regime for failing trades, there's going to be a greater risk.
00:11:16
Speaker
So I guess the spreads argument was probably something always considered by regulators anyway.
00:11:22
Speaker
But maybe let's switch on to then...
00:11:24
Speaker
the mandatory nature of the buy-in, or to put it another way, what about giving the receiving party the option to seek a buy-in rather than making it mandatory in all circumstances?
00:11:34
Speaker
I think, you know, some participants are suggesting that might be a more pragmatic way to deal with some of the issues you highlighted.
00:11:45
Speaker
Any views on that?
00:11:47
Speaker
Well, I think, Paul, you know, if you were given the option of doing something that you don't do now and, you know,
00:11:53
Speaker
You could potentially do it in the future.
00:11:56
Speaker
Are you likely to do it?
00:11:58
Speaker
I personally think that there is less likelihood of a voluntary buying process being operated because firms will be pushed to make that decision to do so or will be challenged to make that decision.
00:12:13
Speaker
You know, some firms will decide not to do it because there's too much effort involved in doing it.
00:12:18
Speaker
And others will fear to do it for all, you know, because they don't want to upset their counterparty.
00:12:23
Speaker
So making it voluntary doesn't, in my mind, improve that settlement efficiency.
00:12:27
Speaker
Whether the existing framework, though, has the right periods for when a buy-in has to be implemented, I think is something that is possibly worth giving some consideration to.
00:12:39
Speaker
Because ultimately, what we are discussing here and discussing
00:12:43
Speaker
what we are debating is a trade-off between guaranteed delivery and price.
00:12:52
Speaker
And if that guaranteed delivery is over a wider period, then potentially there is flexibility in that to have the widening of spreads to be maybe narrowed a bit.
00:13:05
Speaker
maybe different considerations and different approaches to whether that buying is likely to happen, which would actually improve the liquidity issues that are being cited as a problem.
00:13:17
Speaker
But do you think there's, is there a, maybe a sort of third and final sort of headline option, which is to, to that point, to differentiate between liquid assets and less liquid assets, right?
00:13:30
Speaker
I mean, I guess that's,
00:13:32
Speaker
That's difficult, right, because an asset that's liquid today may not be liquid tomorrow, right?
00:13:37
Speaker
So I'm not sure how you make a rules-based set of arrangement around that, but in principle, the liquid assets would seem more compatible with sort of the full settlement discipline regime than less liquid based on what you sort of talked about.
Challenges with Buy-In Agents
00:13:54
Speaker
Yeah, and...
00:13:55
Speaker
And, Paul, that's really what the regulator has done so far.
00:13:59
Speaker
When you consider that an equity transaction would be bought in after four days, a fixed income transaction after seven days, and an SME growth market up to 15 days,
00:14:10
Speaker
That decision to split it by assets is already there.
00:14:17
Speaker
But I think the question is, are those dates realistic?
00:14:21
Speaker
Does the market agree that the dates are realistic?
00:14:23
Speaker
And again, it comes back to that point I made to your last question.
00:14:28
Speaker
It's a trade-off.
00:14:30
Speaker
It's a trade-off between settlement and price.
00:14:31
Speaker
And how much should an investor pay for guaranteed delivery?
00:14:36
Speaker
I think the issue at the moment is that the regulator obviously would consider four days clearly sufficient, but does the market agree with that?
00:14:51
Speaker
Paul, you mentioned that so far there's only one buy-in agent.
00:14:57
Speaker
It sort of leads to the obvious question.
00:14:58
Speaker
If in 12 months from now there's still only one buy-in agent in the market,
00:15:04
Speaker
How could the secure settlement discipline regime go live in practice?
00:15:09
Speaker
I think that's the main question, Paul, or one of the main questions.
00:15:16
Speaker
The way the text is written at the moment is you have to appoint a buying agent to affect the buying.
00:15:23
Speaker
The buying agent has to have no conflict of interest with you, and the buying agent is completely independent.
00:15:32
Speaker
And I think that's one of the reasons why that the industry is struggling to find organizations that want to be buy-in agents.
00:15:39
Speaker
I think the uncertainty around where the regulation is going to fall and this review presenting that uncertainty is who's going to develop a buy-in operating model while there is a possibility that mandatory buy-ins may not take place.
00:15:55
Speaker
So we need that review.
00:15:57
Speaker
We need the decision around whether buy-ins will be mandatory or not.
00:16:02
Speaker
And hopefully that once that's been made clear, then there can be progression towards other firms becoming, you know, buying agents.
00:16:10
Speaker
But I cannot see how the regulation could go live with just one firm offering the service.
00:16:20
Speaker
I think they will struggle, you know, in the timeframe as it stands at the moment to onboard
00:16:24
Speaker
everybody onto that surface should be the only provider of it, which effectively makes the whole mandatory buy-in regime obsolete.
00:16:36
Speaker
Okay.
00:16:37
Speaker
Well, I guess there's clearly an awful lot
Future of CSDR and Industry Needs
00:16:40
Speaker
to think about here, and equally unconscious, we're sort of talking about sort of real-world, day-to-day settlement.
00:16:46
Speaker
So the industry's going to need certainty and plenty of lead time to put in place the final rules.
00:16:52
Speaker
So
00:16:54
Speaker
Maybe my last sort of question is, how do you think as an industry we're going to arrive at that certainty?
00:16:58
Speaker
It certainly seems that it's likely that the pandemic will be with us for a considerable period of time yet.
00:17:05
Speaker
So I assume at some stage that the settlement discipline in whatever form will go live.
00:17:13
Speaker
So what do you think the industry should do to bring that clarity, if you like, to the surface?
00:17:19
Speaker
We're certainly living in times of uncertainty.
00:17:22
Speaker
Should the outcome of the review that we talked about earlier prompt changes to the regulation, that's likely to require the level one to be rewritten, CSDR itself to be rewritten.
00:17:34
Speaker
And if CSDR gets rewritten, then there is a good chance that the RTS will need to be rewritten and then we'll go through the process of getting that all approved again.
00:17:43
Speaker
So I think that we will...
00:17:48
Speaker
live in a world of uncertainty until suddenly the outcome of the review is concluded.
00:17:55
Speaker
I think the review also involves a public consultation.
00:17:58
Speaker
And once that review has been concluded, we will at least have certainty about a pathway to when CSDR begins.
00:18:07
Speaker
or settlement discipline will go live.
00:18:09
Speaker
What I do know is whatever the outcome, we've been great so far at HSBC in bringing the news to our clients and I'm sure we will continue to do so.
00:18:20
Speaker
Indeed, I think you said that perfectly in terms of as a sort of a closing remark, I think there's clearly going to be more development on CSDR and we will certainly aim to continue to appraise our clients of the latest updates on developments for this kind of
00:18:36
Speaker
this key issue in future podcasts.
00:18:39
Speaker
But I think that probably closes nicely.
00:18:41
Speaker
Thanks, Paul, for sharing your views and insights.
00:18:45
Speaker
As I said, we will come back to this, but Gabrielle, maybe back to you, please, to sort of close out the podcast, please.
Closing Remarks and Future Topics
00:18:52
Speaker
So thank you, Paul.
00:18:53
Speaker
And again, for myself as well, it's been quite interesting hearing some divergent views on CSDR and what the future holds.
00:18:59
Speaker
I think in this particular atmosphere, there's a lot of things that can change and can change for the future.
00:19:05
Speaker
So again, thank you both of you.
00:19:08
Speaker
And I'd like all of the audience to join us for our next Reg Talks, where we will be focusing on ESMA's recent AIF&D letter.
00:19:16
Speaker
So feel free to join us for the next time.
00:19:18
Speaker
And thank you to all.
00:19:20
Speaker
Thank you for listening today.
00:19:22
Speaker
This has been HSBC Global Viewpoint Banking and Markets.
00:19:26
Speaker
For more information about anything you heard in this podcast or to learn about HSBC's global services and offerings, please visit gbm.hsbc.com.